It was always about controlling other people's healthcare, including who can and can't access it. Remember all the talk about death panels during the Obamacare debate? It's seeming awfully prescient right now.
Had Hitlary been in place not only would covid mandates have been federally implemented, the medical system would already have been socialized to the point this denial of care they are threatening would already be happening.
Blaming your insecurities and failures on jews? I have heard of this tactic before in pink or purple haired morons blaming their insecurities and failures on whites. I'm sure the similarities are lost on you.
one doesn't allow a right--it is exists independent of any regime or action. One can only infringe upon a right. If it requires the assistance of other people to exist, it isn't a right. Healthcare isn't a right, it's a service.
here are the actual human rights:
Speech and Thought.
Property.
Bodily autonomy.
Assembly.
everything else requires participation of others and to demand their cooperation would infringe on their own rights to implement.
Have you noticed that they've been working on taking away all four of those rights from us for the past 70 years? I'm in my 30s. My parent's generation dropped the ball.
It started in the 20's, honestly, with Hoover. It accelerated with FDR, got bad with kennedy and has been going full steam ahead since. The European countries started earlier.
Rights do not exist. Rights are a faery tale. The only rights you can artificially and temporarily force into existence are those you use immediate and overwhelming violence to defend.
no, they clearly exist insofar as it is immediately clear when they are being infringed because violence is necessary to infringe upon them. In the absence of violence, as a threat or as an application, people behave in a natural way. They assemble property, associate and assemble, think and speak and decide how to dispense with their bodies. It requires intercession for these things to be changed, ergo rights are a description of the natural state of human behavior.
Ah, but see there, your willingness to use violence to enact your liberties gives pause to others who might infringe upon you. You might also identify such a mindset in your fellows. So in all interactions a subtle measure of risk/reward plays out, and if the risk outweighs the reward, then your right is granted.
"Should I grant this stranger a measure of personal space even though I don't know him or know if he's ready to die for such a right he might not care about? Am I prepared to fight to the death over it? If I were to deny him this thing he hasn't asked for, what are the odds he might defend it with his life? How much do I value that space around his body?" Such thoughts are not beyond engagement, regardless of how extreme it all sounds to a civilized man. These are the things that make the foundations of civility - it's merely that today's civil man has forgotten the foundations laid by his forefathers.
Things would be simpler if we were all a little more barbaric. But I still aim for peace and comfort even if my blood must spill on the way.
Well remember, it is HUMAN rights. Those who are not on their side are literally dehumanized in their eyes so it makes total sense they wouldn't get HUMAN rights [assuming healthcare providers were a human right].
"...Also, you need to take two of these pills every day for the rest of your life or you'll die from COVID, we don't care if you're vaccinated." -Pfizer.
The supreme court in Germany has been taken over by politicians. They OK'ed curfews, gave government-run media more money even though elected politicians decided against it, and ruled that "muh climate change" is more important than constitutional rights.
The EU human rights court has been taken over by NGOs. They OK'ed mandatory vaccination of children and rule in favor of non-Europeans against Europeans at every turn.
If you put your trust in them your are going to have a bitter awakening.
For the untaxed? Where can I apply for this untaxed status? Maybe then I can invest in keeping myself healthy without socialized healthcare with all the money I’ll be allowed to keep.
I’m guessing you meant unvaxxed though, and auto-correct did its nefarious work.
Yeah it was an autocorrect. But, If they repaid our taxes that went to that I would be fully for it. This scam has taught me the major faults of our medical systems in canada even more than I already knew.
Commies are announcing massive changes on Thursday to force people too get the clot shot. Can’t buy food, can’t travel, can’t work, can’t provide for your family, no medical care at doctors or hospitals
At this point who is willing to exercise their 2nd amendment
Well, I'm happy they're finally being honest. Healthcare was always a means for them to pressure people to do what they wanted, and I can't think of anything that makes it more clear than this.
The left only talks about universality when it comes time to round people up for their votes and money. Afterward, it is all about drawing increasing narrow circles. First it was with all "allies", then the "woke" then the "proletariat" then the "intelligentsia". Now in China its the 3rd generation commie party members that are hoarding power and money for themselves, that is how the system ends up. Talk is talk but the left was never for any universal system because at the end they want a subjective system of power.
It was always about controlling other people's healthcare, including who can and can't access it. Remember all the talk about death panels during the Obamacare debate? It's seeming awfully prescient right now.
Had Hitlary been in place not only would covid mandates have been federally implemented, the medical system would already have been socialized to the point this denial of care they are threatening would already be happening.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed
Blaming your insecurities and failures on jews? I have heard of this tactic before in pink or purple haired morons blaming their insecurities and failures on whites. I'm sure the similarities are lost on you.
Ignoring jewish malfeasance because you're scared of your social status?
How sad.
Stormcuck or SJW?
I think SJW!
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed
You support the elimination of St. Patrick's day from the US?
What a wonderful strawman sir, well executed!
The dude is a new account spamming the same antisemitic links and message on every thread.
They get banned, and create new accounts to spread bullshit. Rinse and repeat.
It's annoying, because debunking bullshit requires much more effort than to create it.
You don't debunk anything. You just show up to be contrarian, which is not the same thing.
Says the guy who believes in communist conspiracy theories that were NEVER proven to be true.
Sounds like you're projecting some caricature you have in your head again.
one doesn't allow a right--it is exists independent of any regime or action. One can only infringe upon a right. If it requires the assistance of other people to exist, it isn't a right. Healthcare isn't a right, it's a service.
here are the actual human rights:
everything else requires participation of others and to demand their cooperation would infringe on their own rights to implement.
Have you noticed that they've been working on taking away all four of those rights from us for the past 70 years? I'm in my 30s. My parent's generation dropped the ball.
It started in the 20's, honestly, with Hoover. It accelerated with FDR, got bad with kennedy and has been going full steam ahead since. The European countries started earlier.
I always ask these people why we don’t have a right to food and home heating. They seem more important than healthcare.
Ask them what constitutes healthcare first. They never agree on that one.
Freedom of association. (which is not the same as freedom of assembly)
Association and Assembly end up being the saying thing, in the end.
Rights do not exist. Rights are a faery tale. The only rights you can artificially and temporarily force into existence are those you use immediate and overwhelming violence to defend.
no, they clearly exist insofar as it is immediately clear when they are being infringed because violence is necessary to infringe upon them. In the absence of violence, as a threat or as an application, people behave in a natural way. They assemble property, associate and assemble, think and speak and decide how to dispense with their bodies. It requires intercession for these things to be changed, ergo rights are a description of the natural state of human behavior.
Ah, but see there, your willingness to use violence to enact your liberties gives pause to others who might infringe upon you. You might also identify such a mindset in your fellows. So in all interactions a subtle measure of risk/reward plays out, and if the risk outweighs the reward, then your right is granted.
"Should I grant this stranger a measure of personal space even though I don't know him or know if he's ready to die for such a right he might not care about? Am I prepared to fight to the death over it? If I were to deny him this thing he hasn't asked for, what are the odds he might defend it with his life? How much do I value that space around his body?" Such thoughts are not beyond engagement, regardless of how extreme it all sounds to a civilized man. These are the things that make the foundations of civility - it's merely that today's civil man has forgotten the foundations laid by his forefathers.
Things would be simpler if we were all a little more barbaric. But I still aim for peace and comfort even if my blood must spill on the way.
Well remember, it is HUMAN rights. Those who are not on their side are literally dehumanized in their eyes so it makes total sense they wouldn't get HUMAN rights [assuming healthcare providers were a human right].
Yeah but when we compare it to their claims in 2011, THAT'S what makes it hypocritical!
2010: "The evil private pharma companies are making money from the sick!"
2021: "The hero private pharma companies have saved humanity from being sick!"
"...Also, you need to take two of these pills every day for the rest of your life or you'll die from COVID, we don't care if you're vaccinated." -Pfizer.
Your health belongs to the state, comrade.
Hard to do it here in Europe, we are all paying every month for universal health care so to exclude us will come with some very bitter court jousting.
The supreme court in Germany has been taken over by politicians. They OK'ed curfews, gave government-run media more money even though elected politicians decided against it, and ruled that "muh climate change" is more important than constitutional rights.
The EU human rights court has been taken over by NGOs. They OK'ed mandatory vaccination of children and rule in favor of non-Europeans against Europeans at every turn.
If you put your trust in them your are going to have a bitter awakening.
Did they give healthcare to Charlie Gard?
We pay in canada too but the writing is on the wall, they are already hinting taking away healthcare for the untaxed
For the untaxed? Where can I apply for this untaxed status? Maybe then I can invest in keeping myself healthy without socialized healthcare with all the money I’ll be allowed to keep.
I’m guessing you meant unvaxxed though, and auto-correct did its nefarious work.
Yeah it was an autocorrect. But, If they repaid our taxes that went to that I would be fully for it. This scam has taught me the major faults of our medical systems in canada even more than I already knew.
So Quick survey:
Commies are announcing massive changes on Thursday to force people too get the clot shot. Can’t buy food, can’t travel, can’t work, can’t provide for your family, no medical care at doctors or hospitals
At this point who is willing to exercise their 2nd amendment
Hypocrites, the lot of them.
When this happens i just roleplay as a three-times-vaxxed and demand that the two-times-vaxxed don't get healthcare for being virus spreaders.
It is that simple. Doesn't need much discussion.
Fuck them faggit retards. I will die the same way I was born, UN-FUCKING-VAXXED.
Well, I'm happy they're finally being honest. Healthcare was always a means for them to pressure people to do what they wanted, and I can't think of anything that makes it more clear than this.
The left only talks about universality when it comes time to round people up for their votes and money. Afterward, it is all about drawing increasing narrow circles. First it was with all "allies", then the "woke" then the "proletariat" then the "intelligentsia". Now in China its the 3rd generation commie party members that are hoarding power and money for themselves, that is how the system ends up. Talk is talk but the left was never for any universal system because at the end they want a subjective system of power.