Funny, you're arguing the exact opposite on another thread at this very moment. Anyway, the point is not that this person is innocent, but that it seems that angry troons hate this place because they call them out as not being women.
I'm pretty sure that politically motivated hits on feminists don't fucking happen.
What are you smoking? So called "TERFs" are attacked everywhere, as they are heretics from the feminist creed in believing that feminism is for women and not for hairy, bald men who claim to be women.
You can call trannies not women here, or on TD, or even on c/funny. Probably on the stormfag sub too.
And some may want a community centered around opposition to tranny nonsense.
I'm simply trying to explain that TERFs cannot be trusted
And some may want a community centered around opposition to tranny nonsense.
Then bring back the transfags community. Yes the TERF's are right about trannies, but they're still feminists. They're leftists who are pissed off that leftist tactics are being used against them, but they're perfectly happy use those tactics against their opponents when they have the upper hand. Shit, they're the ones who laid the ideological groundwork for what the trannies are doing. They set the rules of the game, the trannies beat them at the game under those rules, and they're butthurt.
The other problem is that these TERF sites are Faggit clones with the sole exception of allowing some mild criticism of trannies. Have you seen the sidebar on Ovarit's replacement for r/itsafetish? You can't use "dehumanizing language" like tranny or troon, you can't mock their suicide rates, no "bigotry" like "ableism", and of course since it's a female supremist community men are only allowed if they accept that they're Untermenschen.
A communities.win site to criticize trannies is sorely needed but it will be hobbled from the start if we let feminists run the show.
Correct, and a lot of them are often somewhat obnoxious. That said, there is no reason why feminists could not serve our ends.
Have you seen the sidebar on Ovarit's replacement for r/itsafetish? You can't use "dehumanizing language" like tranny or troon, you can't mock their suicide rates, no "bigotry" like "ableism
That's pretty dumb. But I don't know about Ovarit's sitewide rules - hell, this is the first time I have heard about it. There is a usefulness to a community that an ordinary feminist finds reasonable agitating against this sort of stuff. The more division that is created within their community, the weaker that they become.
That is why they hate "TERFs" so much. And frankly, if I knew nothing except for the fact that SJWs hate them, I'd still support them for that reason alone.
By stupid hit pieces in the media designed to make you think they aren't all on the same side?
They clearly aren't. They consider the GC to be a greater enemy than anti-feminists, because they are heretics from their cause. The parochialism of small differences and all that.
The only reason GC got dropped from Reddit was because people were talking about their violent rhetoric
I cannot even conceive of a mind that believes women are trying to stage a genocide against him and all men, while simulatenously believing that Reddit banned a community for... violent rhetoric against men.
It's impossible for anyone to believe these two things simultaneously.
You clearly think they won't shit up the entire platform if you want them here.
They will be useful.
See, I'm not a tranny sympathizer. Or a tranny, because apparently someone thinks that.
Every time anyone says anything negative about trannies, you go on a tirade about "TERFs" and start REEEEEE'ing about that.
Exactly. They're right about one thing, but on literally every other issue they're just as bad as the intersectionalist lunatics. I'd totally be down with an anti-tranny site here but not if we're just gonna let the feminists run it. Transfags needs to make a comeback.
I don't keep up with the communities site as a whole anymore. I know I'd seen they were going to make them user-created...does that mean without any vetting of the moderators? That's just Reddit all over again.
Maybe you should go create all of the woman communities yourself, fly under the radar a bit, then harass them via moderation.
So you trust Wikipedia now? Hilarious. Article sounds like angry troons have written it.
Funny, you're arguing the exact opposite on another thread at this very moment. Anyway, the point is not that this person is innocent, but that it seems that angry troons hate this place because they call them out as not being women.
What are you smoking? So called "TERFs" are attacked everywhere, as they are heretics from the feminist creed in believing that feminism is for women and not for hairy, bald men who claim to be women.
And some may want a community centered around opposition to tranny nonsense.
It's funny that you think that I 'trust' anyone.
Correct.
Then bring back the transfags community. Yes the TERF's are right about trannies, but they're still feminists. They're leftists who are pissed off that leftist tactics are being used against them, but they're perfectly happy use those tactics against their opponents when they have the upper hand. Shit, they're the ones who laid the ideological groundwork for what the trannies are doing. They set the rules of the game, the trannies beat them at the game under those rules, and they're butthurt.
The other problem is that these TERF sites are Faggit clones with the sole exception of allowing some mild criticism of trannies. Have you seen the sidebar on Ovarit's replacement for r/itsafetish? You can't use "dehumanizing language" like tranny or troon, you can't mock their suicide rates, no "bigotry" like "ableism", and of course since it's a female supremist community men are only allowed if they accept that they're Untermenschen.
A communities.win site to criticize trannies is sorely needed but it will be hobbled from the start if we let feminists run the show.
Correct, and a lot of them are often somewhat obnoxious. That said, there is no reason why feminists could not serve our ends.
That's pretty dumb. But I don't know about Ovarit's sitewide rules - hell, this is the first time I have heard about it. There is a usefulness to a community that an ordinary feminist finds reasonable agitating against this sort of stuff. The more division that is created within their community, the weaker that they become.
That is why they hate "TERFs" so much. And frankly, if I knew nothing except for the fact that SJWs hate them, I'd still support them for that reason alone.
They clearly aren't. They consider the GC to be a greater enemy than anti-feminists, because they are heretics from their cause. The parochialism of small differences and all that.
I cannot even conceive of a mind that believes women are trying to stage a genocide against him and all men, while simulatenously believing that Reddit banned a community for... violent rhetoric against men.
It's impossible for anyone to believe these two things simultaneously.
They will be useful.
Every time anyone says anything negative about trannies, you go on a tirade about "TERFs" and start REEEEEE'ing about that.
You don’t really get to pick.
Exactly. They're right about one thing, but on literally every other issue they're just as bad as the intersectionalist lunatics. I'd totally be down with an anti-tranny site here but not if we're just gonna let the feminists run it. Transfags needs to make a comeback.
Vetting and gatekeeping are important.
No feminists or other Marxists should be allowed in, otherwise they'll worm their way into positions of power.
As much as a I utterly loath trannies and want them sent back to their home plane of existence, allowing feminists on .win is a recipe for disaster.
I don't keep up with the communities site as a whole anymore. I know I'd seen they were going to make them user-created...does that mean without any vetting of the moderators? That's just Reddit all over again.
Maybe you should go create all of the woman communities yourself, fly under the radar a bit, then harass them via moderation.
Don't lower yourself to their level. Censorship is censorship regardless of which way it flows.