Jokes aside, no one on the left is ever going to make the connection between their precious "climate change" and obesity. If the process of creating food is one of the greatest drivers of waste and emissions - and it is - then overeaters are among the greatest offenders. If we can strictly regulate whole industries in the name of climate change, why can't we regulate diets?
China and Africa drive pollution and climate change. Climate activists are promoting global eugenics and mass culling. OR THEY WOULD BE if they weren’t duplicitous communists in disguise that don’t give a single shit about the environment.
The biggest source of climate emergency is population. No population, no pollution created by population. I don't think that's debatable.
So why is no one advocating for nuclear war? It simultaneously removes billions of population, and makes nuclear winter which will global cool and reverse the effects of the warming. If global warming is really a world-ending concern as they like to doomsay, then they should be clamoring for the big red buttons to be used on the densest population centers in the world.
If their goal is gradual depopulation, then the global warming isn't a concern to them; they want it for another reason. Easier rulership, perhaps. Because you don't say something is a clear and present danger by 2040 or whatever date they're using now (it started with 1990, so they keep pushing it forward), and then propose a solution that only solves the problem after 3 generatons, or in other words, 2080-ish.
Jokes aside, no one on the left is ever going to make the connection between their precious "climate change" and obesity. If the process of creating food is one of the greatest drivers of waste and emissions - and it is - then overeaters are among the greatest offenders. If we can strictly regulate whole industries in the name of climate change, why can't we regulate diets?
China and Africa drive pollution and climate change. Climate activists are promoting global eugenics and mass culling. OR THEY WOULD BE if they weren’t duplicitous communists in disguise that don’t give a single shit about the environment.
The biggest source of climate emergency is population. No population, no pollution created by population. I don't think that's debatable.
So why is no one advocating for nuclear war? It simultaneously removes billions of population, and makes nuclear winter which will global cool and reverse the effects of the warming. If global warming is really a world-ending concern as they like to doomsay, then they should be clamoring for the big red buttons to be used on the densest population centers in the world.
If their goal is gradual depopulation, then the global warming isn't a concern to them; they want it for another reason. Easier rulership, perhaps. Because you don't say something is a clear and present danger by 2040 or whatever date they're using now (it started with 1990, so they keep pushing it forward), and then propose a solution that only solves the problem after 3 generatons, or in other words, 2080-ish.