We has a soft spot for his rants, which generally have a higher like-to-dislike ratio.
Much of the time his comments have negative karma.
I think he brings more to the discussion than subtracts from it.
Disagree. If he actually had a point most of the time, I'd agree. But most of his comments are some variation of his female supremacy conspiracy theory. Maybe 1 in 10 times he has a valid (as in based in reality) criticism of feminists.
He might stop hating women once he actually has sex with one.
He might stop hating women once he actually has sex with one.
It's plenty easy to shit on him and his worldview without resorting to this sort of infantile rhetoric. I expect better quality castigation from this community.
Seriously though, what are the most likely sources of his anti-female rage? Its either that he was abused by a woman or he's sexually frustrated. He claims that his mother never physically, psychologically, or sexually abused him so the latter seems most likely.
Seriously though, what are the most likely sources of his anti-female rage?
I used to think that it was an absolute fiend of a girlfriend, but he said that this was not the case. Now I think that he basically drowned in an internet echo-chamber. It's the same way women get radicalized into being feminists. They hear of all sorts of injustices and alleged injustices against womankind, and conclude that these are far more common than they actually are.
Or for that matter, Stormfags and their Jew-obsession. Go talk to any ordinary Jew, and he's no different from any other guy. But because of their overrepresentation among journalists, and quite bad ones at that, Stormfags convince themselves that da Joooz are out to get us.
He claims that his mother never physically, psychologically, or sexually abused him so the latter seems most likely.
His mother is a saint. But you're using this to attack him. Whether or not he has any trouble getting laid, and evidence suggests that he does not, that has no bearing at all on the validity of his claims.
This is you earlier this week defending that a child being abused is an acceptable casualty if it sticks it to the libtards woman then throwing in puritanical pearl clutching in the reply,
Honestly, the idea of a naked child around grown women is sickening. Society normalizes some weird shit.
You are not being brigaded. You are not a victim. You are amongst other things advocating/excusing child abuse because it's a means to an end for women to get harassed more.
We has a soft spot for his rants, which generally have a higher like-to-dislike ratio.
I think he brings more to the discussion than subtracts from it.
Much of the time his comments have negative karma.
Disagree. If he actually had a point most of the time, I'd agree. But most of his comments are some variation of his female supremacy conspiracy theory. Maybe 1 in 10 times he has a valid (as in based in reality) criticism of feminists.
He might stop hating women once he actually has sex with one.
It's plenty easy to shit on him and his worldview without resorting to this sort of infantile rhetoric. I expect better quality castigation from this community.
Seriously though, what are the most likely sources of his anti-female rage? Its either that he was abused by a woman or he's sexually frustrated. He claims that his mother never physically, psychologically, or sexually abused him so the latter seems most likely.
I used to think that it was an absolute fiend of a girlfriend, but he said that this was not the case. Now I think that he basically drowned in an internet echo-chamber. It's the same way women get radicalized into being feminists. They hear of all sorts of injustices and alleged injustices against womankind, and conclude that these are far more common than they actually are.
Or for that matter, Stormfags and their Jew-obsession. Go talk to any ordinary Jew, and he's no different from any other guy. But because of their overrepresentation among journalists, and quite bad ones at that, Stormfags convince themselves that da Joooz are out to get us.
His mother is a saint. But you're using this to attack him. Whether or not he has any trouble getting laid, and evidence suggests that he does not, that has no bearing at all on the validity of his claims.
Notwithstanding his views, Margarine is a pretty decent guy.
Same as you.
only time i noticed you going negative is when you tell the lefties who worship hitler that it's women, not the juice.
Who is brigading kia2.win? Seems pretty far below anyone on the left's radar.
Stormfags generally.
Yes, "brigading". That's the only reason.
This is you earlier this week defending that a child being abused is an acceptable casualty if it sticks it to the
libtardswoman then throwing in puritanical pearl clutching in the reply,https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jJPtvVnE/x/c/4JAer8eqxg1
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/12jJPtvVnE/x/c/4JAer8erVm1
You are not being brigaded. You are not a victim. You are amongst other things advocating/excusing child abuse because it's a means to an end for women to get harassed more.
Ngl at this point it'd be weird if I stopped seeing his posts here.