Yeah, I'm just wondering if that's how the videos that were DMCA'd titled. If they're doing full mirrors of his video then I think that is DMCA-ble isn't it?
I believe you can technically attack (copyright strike) any video, but it's supposedly legal to repost someone's video if you 'transform' it enough from the original, with commentary and such.
It's still going to be a judgement call by the trannies at youtube, so there's no sure defense.
It may be legal, but activist judges won't care. They'll take down what offends them with some excuse like "it wasn't modified enough from the original video," or their favorite, "no standing."
Yeah, I'm just wondering if that's how the videos that were DMCA'd titled. If they're doing full mirrors of his video then I think that is DMCA-ble isn't it?
Yes, a direct complete reupload, completely unedited in any discernable fashion except the uploader, is DMCA-able.
The ones screenshotted seem to be full mirrors based on the title and the author's subsequent tweet: https://twitter.com/Bowblax/status/1407264725096747008
I believe you can technically attack (copyright strike) any video, but it's supposedly legal to repost someone's video if you 'transform' it enough from the original, with commentary and such.
It's still going to be a judgement call by the trannies at youtube, so there's no sure defense.
It may be legal, but activist judges won't care. They'll take down what offends them with some excuse like "it wasn't modified enough from the original video," or their favorite, "no standing."