Though “conventional wisdom,” according to the catalog description of “Black Holes: Race and the Cosmos,” holds that the “‘black’ in black holes has nothing to do with race,” astronomy professor Nicholas Battaglia and comparative literature professor Parisa Vaziri know better.
**** off you lunatics. Black holes are called black holes because their gravity is sufficient that even light cannot escape and thus, as there is no light reflecting off of them, they are functionally black colored!
This is like being in seventh grade and looking up big adjectives that you think sound cool, and sprinkling them liberally over your English paper without caring if they actually fit very well.
"I'm almost finished my new racial studies paper. How can I make it stand out from the 40 nearly Identical ones that came out this week? I know! This one has [Black Holes/Glaciers/Neutrinos/etc.] That makes it both more interesting, smarter, and REAL science."
I'm not going to subject myself to the dreck, but I'd be astonished if the paper even has an understanding of black holes on par with a D-Tier science fiction paperback.
Another thing to add to the list of the double standard of "Anything that includes the word black is about black people, but whiteness has nothing to do with race, despite being created by critical race theorists."
I guess we can't have one day without the world getting more retarded
It turns out that black holes are near perfect black bodies. This, plus the fact that black holes really suck, has significant racial implications.
Not only that, but black holes take anything it can get close enough to and makes sure you can never get it back.
Remember when calling something a Black Hole was racist?
**** off you lunatics. Black holes are called black holes because their gravity is sufficient that even light cannot escape and thus, as there is no light reflecting off of them, they are functionally black colored!
This is like being in seventh grade and looking up big adjectives that you think sound cool, and sprinkling them liberally over your English paper without caring if they actually fit very well.
"I'm almost finished my new racial studies paper. How can I make it stand out from the 40 nearly Identical ones that came out this week? I know! This one has [Black Holes/Glaciers/Neutrinos/etc.] That makes it both more interesting, smarter, and REAL science."
I'm not going to subject myself to the dreck, but I'd be astonished if the paper even has an understanding of black holes on par with a D-Tier science fiction paperback.
Another thing to add to the list of the double standard of "Anything that includes the word black is about black people, but whiteness has nothing to do with race, despite being created by critical race theorists."
Who knew whining about racism could be so lucrative