"Yeah they're indoctrinating kids, burning cities, censoring dissent, and arresting people, but we shouldn't just group up to prevent that! We need to look good while they do whatever they want."
Then out spake brave Horatius,
The Captain of the Gate:
To every man upon this earth
Death cometh soon or late.
And how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers,
And the temples of his gods
We do not know what our chances of survival are, so we fight as if they were zero. We do not know what we are facing, so we fight as if it was the dark gods themselves. No one will remember us now and we may never be buried beneath Titan, so we will build our own memorial here. The Chapter might lose us and the Imperium might never know we existed, but the Enemy — the Enemy will know. The Enemy will remember. We will hurt it so badly that it will never forget us until the stars burn out and the Emperor vanquishes it at the end of time. When Chaos is dying, its last thought will be of us. That is our memorial — carved into the heart of Chaos. We cannot lose, Grey Knights. We have already won."
She's off the mark, but she does have a bit of a point. CRT is clearly racist and incitement to genocide, but think about whom you're trying to convince with these arguments: You're trying to convince normies who've been so steeped in the myth of white privilege that you'll never get through to them by saying "This is racist against white people." It's better to argue against CRT on the basis that it's ahistorical and factually wrong.
Again, you're not trying to convince leftists. They really are in it for the power. You're trying to convince normies. Most people still aren't living their lives subsumed by the culture war.
Nice diversion, shaboz. CRT isn't anti-white isn't it and doesn't advocate for a white genocide. Next thing you'll tell me that the genocide under the Cultural Revolution didn't happened and the Holodomor is just a myth.
Consent to any suggested -ism is what creates a hierarchy under false authority; because to consent to suggestion represents using free will to consent to a suggestion made by the free will of another. Free will represents the sole authority over self; consenting to the free will of another represents the ignorance thereof.
It is the free will of those who suggest the -isms that then has the power to define the narrative (the mainstream) for all who consent to believe it.
going along with lies in an attempt to sell people the truth never works well
What if we are form within flow aka life (form) moving from inception towards death (flow) and flow represents constant change; while both true and false represent forms ignorance thereof?
Could ti be that us consenting to the suggestions of others causes us to believe "true"; which then allows others to contradict it aka "false"? Does nature offer false information?
I'm with dagthegnome on this one. Normies absorb Leftist narratives, but they are swayed fairly easily because they know they don't know a lot of things. That's the Left's primary trick: calling them ignorant and laughing at dissent as if their position is normal.
It doesn't work in all cases, typically emotional appeal works, but in some cases fact based arguments do work.
Complaints about the Coronavirus origin, treatments, and lockdowns are finally bubbling up because Scientists kept individually investigating and found that the consensus was consistently wrong
Historians basically attacked the 1619 project from all directions, despite major efforts to get it inserted from the media and Leftist politics.
CRT isn't directly an incitement to genocide, it's just that genocide is the inevitable conclusion of someone who accepts it, given enough time has passed to reinforce the indoctrination.
I agree that arguing ahistory is a working solution, but the behavior of so many CRT pushers is so galling that I think anti-white rhetoric is perfectly fine.
We can convince normies that CRT is anti-white when we show them publicly humiliating and degrading white children. Or when they use white students as literal human shields. Unlike in many other cases, the immediate emotional reaction is something we can use to our advantage because the Leftists over-extended so hard.
When the Leftists demand a $15 minimum wage, a simpleton half-wit normie might think "oh yeah, I want poor people to have money."
When the Leftists demand a white kid should kill himself and he comes home crying, a simpleton half-wit normie will think, "Hey, what the fuck, you can't do that to kids!"
The second you start talking about white genocide, some random will chime in with muh stormcuck or some derivative, in an attempt to shame op into silence (see: dagthegnome). A large swath of normies are unreformable civnats. They’re scared of being labeled muh rayciss and inoculated against facts and reason.
I literally say in the comment you're replying to that CRT is incitement to white genocide. So that's two stormcucks in this thread who are too stupid to know how to read.
Hurr durr. You don’t agree with me so you’re muh stormcuck muh rayciss AND illiterate. Stick to sniffing your own farts, it isn’t much but you’re good at it.
FACT, noun [Latin factum, from facio, to make or do]. Doing represents setting form into flow aka acting upon in response to (form to flow). Reason represents the conflict between true versus false, caused by ignoring flow. Why? Because flow represents ongoing change; while true/false represents affixed assumption in ignorance of ongoing change.
The few are the ones making the suggestions to divide the many into the conflicts of reason; which they then control by suggesting contradictions (to both sides) to keep them going against each other. It's called talmudic reasoning.
While I like her and oppose racialism, she's totally wrong:
CRT is not about race. It's about power.
It is not about a genuine focus on race, positive or negative, but that's true of all racialism. Racialism is always a progressive grift to seize power.
However, CRT in all other ways is explicitly about race and is specifically anti-white. It exists, for the stated purpose (along with Critical Theory generally) to rebuke all claims by any white person that they are racist. That is it's foundational origin. It exists to assert, and then unapologetically demand, that all white people are all racist at all times.
This is pretty much right but is missing the logical conclusion.
Since the 60s the subverted media and education institutions have been indoctrinating that being a racist is the absolute worst thing a person can be. Much worse than a thief or a murderer. Since a "racist" is such an "evil" person then anything that is done to harm them is inherently justified.
Now add in this system of "thought" whose premise is that white = racist and only the willfully blind won't come to the logical conclusion.
How many of the proponents of CRT don't want a repeat of the 1804 Haiti Massacre?
Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, torturing and killing entire families. Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed. A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.
A few that cared about optics might do some equivocation but if you ask the orc footsoldiers on the street pretty much all of them would answer "hell yeah".
You mean the 1804 Haitian White Genocide? Call it what it is. And the answer is none. None of them don't want a repeat of the Haitian Genocide.
Believe me, I'm well aware of what the logical conclusion is. I've even compared "On The Jewish Question", "The Eternal Jew", and some of the academic pieces being put out and pointed out, quite explicitly, that Marx and the National Socialists were less openly hateful of Jews than the Left is of Whites. This is pre-genocidal rhetoric the foot-soldiers are pushing.
My point is only that from a purely from a "four corners of the document" approach.
"Yeah they're indoctrinating kids, burning cities, censoring dissent, and arresting people, but we shouldn't just group up to prevent that! We need to look good while they do whatever they want."
The delusion of thinking there is some kind of nobility about being the most principled corpse in the mass grave.
Exactly. This mentality is fucking cancer.
Then out spake brave Horatius, The Captain of the Gate: To every man upon this earth Death cometh soon or late. And how can man die better Than facing fearful odds, For the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his gods
She's off the mark, but she does have a bit of a point. CRT is clearly racist and incitement to genocide, but think about whom you're trying to convince with these arguments: You're trying to convince normies who've been so steeped in the myth of white privilege that you'll never get through to them by saying "This is racist against white people." It's better to argue against CRT on the basis that it's ahistorical and factually wrong.
In your experience, has this ever worked on leftists? Being factually wrong and hypocritical is their normal state.
Again, you're not trying to convince leftists. They really are in it for the power. You're trying to convince normies. Most people still aren't living their lives subsumed by the culture war.
It's not a lie to argue against CRT on the basis that it's ahistorical and factually wrong.
I love how you're totally dismissing that CRT is anti-white in nature. Are you a shaboz? Asking for a friend.
Where did I say that?
What we have here is more proof that stormfags are too stupid to read.
Nice diversion, shaboz. CRT isn't anti-white isn't it and doesn't advocate for a white genocide. Next thing you'll tell me that the genocide under the Cultural Revolution didn't happened and the Holodomor is just a myth.
Okay shaboz, it's okay to come out as one now.
Consent to any suggested -ism is what creates a hierarchy under false authority; because to consent to suggestion represents using free will to consent to a suggestion made by the free will of another. Free will represents the sole authority over self; consenting to the free will of another represents the ignorance thereof.
It is the free will of those who suggest the -isms that then has the power to define the narrative (the mainstream) for all who consent to believe it.
What if we are form within flow aka life (form) moving from inception towards death (flow) and flow represents constant change; while both true and false represent forms ignorance thereof?
Could ti be that us consenting to the suggestions of others causes us to believe "true"; which then allows others to contradict it aka "false"? Does nature offer false information?
I'm with dagthegnome on this one. Normies absorb Leftist narratives, but they are swayed fairly easily because they know they don't know a lot of things. That's the Left's primary trick: calling them ignorant and laughing at dissent as if their position is normal.
It doesn't work in all cases, typically emotional appeal works, but in some cases fact based arguments do work.
Complaints about the Coronavirus origin, treatments, and lockdowns are finally bubbling up because Scientists kept individually investigating and found that the consensus was consistently wrong
Historians basically attacked the 1619 project from all directions, despite major efforts to get it inserted from the media and Leftist politics.
CRT isn't directly an incitement to genocide, it's just that genocide is the inevitable conclusion of someone who accepts it, given enough time has passed to reinforce the indoctrination.
I agree that arguing ahistory is a working solution, but the behavior of so many CRT pushers is so galling that I think anti-white rhetoric is perfectly fine.
We can convince normies that CRT is anti-white when we show them publicly humiliating and degrading white children. Or when they use white students as literal human shields. Unlike in many other cases, the immediate emotional reaction is something we can use to our advantage because the Leftists over-extended so hard.
When the Leftists demand a $15 minimum wage, a simpleton half-wit normie might think "oh yeah, I want poor people to have money."
When the Leftists demand a white kid should kill himself and he comes home crying, a simpleton half-wit normie will think, "Hey, what the fuck, you can't do that to kids!"
The second you start talking about white genocide, some random will chime in with muh stormcuck or some derivative, in an attempt to shame op into silence (see: dagthegnome). A large swath of normies are unreformable civnats. They’re scared of being labeled muh rayciss and inoculated against facts and reason.
I literally say in the comment you're replying to that CRT is incitement to white genocide. So that's two stormcucks in this thread who are too stupid to know how to read.
Stormcuck isn’t an insult you whinny little bitch but thanks for outting yourself as a civnat faggot.
Thanks for outing yourself as illiterate.
Hurr durr. You don’t agree with me so you’re muh stormcuck muh rayciss AND illiterate. Stick to sniffing your own farts, it isn’t much but you’re good at it.
There seem to be a lot of larping edgelords out today who are missing your point entirely.
It's going to be like this all summer until school goes back in.
FACT, noun [Latin factum, from facio, to make or do]. Doing represents setting form into flow aka acting upon in response to (form to flow). Reason represents the conflict between true versus false, caused by ignoring flow. Why? Because flow represents ongoing change; while true/false represents affixed assumption in ignorance of ongoing change.
The few are the ones making the suggestions to divide the many into the conflicts of reason; which they then control by suggesting contradictions (to both sides) to keep them going against each other. It's called talmudic reasoning.
She's a fucking retard.
Like every feminists on the planet, ever.
While I like her and oppose racialism, she's totally wrong:
It is not about a genuine focus on race, positive or negative, but that's true of all racialism. Racialism is always a progressive grift to seize power.
However, CRT in all other ways is explicitly about race and is specifically anti-white. It exists, for the stated purpose (along with Critical Theory generally) to rebuke all claims by any white person that they are racist. That is it's foundational origin. It exists to assert, and then unapologetically demand, that all white people are all racist at all times.
This is pretty much right but is missing the logical conclusion.
Since the 60s the subverted media and education institutions have been indoctrinating that being a racist is the absolute worst thing a person can be. Much worse than a thief or a murderer. Since a "racist" is such an "evil" person then anything that is done to harm them is inherently justified.
Now add in this system of "thought" whose premise is that white = racist and only the willfully blind won't come to the logical conclusion.
How many of the proponents of CRT don't want a repeat of the 1804 Haiti Massacre?
A few that cared about optics might do some equivocation but if you ask the orc footsoldiers on the street pretty much all of them would answer "hell yeah".
You mean the 1804 Haitian White Genocide? Call it what it is. And the answer is none. None of them don't want a repeat of the Haitian Genocide.
Believe me, I'm well aware of what the logical conclusion is. I've even compared "On The Jewish Question", "The Eternal Jew", and some of the academic pieces being put out and pointed out, quite explicitly, that Marx and the National Socialists were less openly hateful of Jews than the Left is of Whites. This is pre-genocidal rhetoric the foot-soldiers are pushing.
My point is only that from a purely from a "four corners of the document" approach.
From the replies:
It's the only reaction that CRT advocates will tolerate, because they're a bunch of idiots.
A nitter link for you all: https://nitter.fdn.fr/DrKarlynB/status/1405355193907265536