While I like her and oppose racialism, she's totally wrong:
CRT is not about race. It's about power.
It is not about a genuine focus on race, positive or negative, but that's true of all racialism. Racialism is always a progressive grift to seize power.
However, CRT in all other ways is explicitly about race and is specifically anti-white. It exists, for the stated purpose (along with Critical Theory generally) to rebuke all claims by any white person that they are racist. That is it's foundational origin. It exists to assert, and then unapologetically demand, that all white people are all racist at all times.
This is pretty much right but is missing the logical conclusion.
Since the 60s the subverted media and education institutions have been indoctrinating that being a racist is the absolute worst thing a person can be. Much worse than a thief or a murderer. Since a "racist" is such an "evil" person then anything that is done to harm them is inherently justified.
Now add in this system of "thought" whose premise is that white = racist and only the willfully blind won't come to the logical conclusion.
How many of the proponents of CRT don't want a repeat of the 1804 Haiti Massacre?
Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, torturing and killing entire families. Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed. A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.
A few that cared about optics might do some equivocation but if you ask the orc footsoldiers on the street pretty much all of them would answer "hell yeah".
You mean the 1804 Haitian White Genocide? Call it what it is. And the answer is none. None of them don't want a repeat of the Haitian Genocide.
Believe me, I'm well aware of what the logical conclusion is. I've even compared "On The Jewish Question", "The Eternal Jew", and some of the academic pieces being put out and pointed out, quite explicitly, that Marx and the National Socialists were less openly hateful of Jews than the Left is of Whites. This is pre-genocidal rhetoric the foot-soldiers are pushing.
My point is only that from a purely from a "four corners of the document" approach.
While I like her and oppose racialism, she's totally wrong:
It is not about a genuine focus on race, positive or negative, but that's true of all racialism. Racialism is always a progressive grift to seize power.
However, CRT in all other ways is explicitly about race and is specifically anti-white. It exists, for the stated purpose (along with Critical Theory generally) to rebuke all claims by any white person that they are racist. That is it's foundational origin. It exists to assert, and then unapologetically demand, that all white people are all racist at all times.
This is pretty much right but is missing the logical conclusion.
Since the 60s the subverted media and education institutions have been indoctrinating that being a racist is the absolute worst thing a person can be. Much worse than a thief or a murderer. Since a "racist" is such an "evil" person then anything that is done to harm them is inherently justified.
Now add in this system of "thought" whose premise is that white = racist and only the willfully blind won't come to the logical conclusion.
How many of the proponents of CRT don't want a repeat of the 1804 Haiti Massacre?
A few that cared about optics might do some equivocation but if you ask the orc footsoldiers on the street pretty much all of them would answer "hell yeah".
You mean the 1804 Haitian White Genocide? Call it what it is. And the answer is none. None of them don't want a repeat of the Haitian Genocide.
Believe me, I'm well aware of what the logical conclusion is. I've even compared "On The Jewish Question", "The Eternal Jew", and some of the academic pieces being put out and pointed out, quite explicitly, that Marx and the National Socialists were less openly hateful of Jews than the Left is of Whites. This is pre-genocidal rhetoric the foot-soldiers are pushing.
My point is only that from a purely from a "four corners of the document" approach.