Again, you're not trying to convince leftists. They really are in it for the power. You're trying to convince normies. Most people still aren't living their lives subsumed by the culture war.
Consent to any suggested -ism is what creates a hierarchy under false authority; because to consent to suggestion represents using free will to consent to a suggestion made by the free will of another. Free will represents the sole authority over self; consenting to the free will of another represents the ignorance thereof.
It is the free will of those who suggest the -isms that then has the power to define the narrative (the mainstream) for all who consent to believe it.
going along with lies in an attempt to sell people the truth never works well
What if we are form within flow aka life (form) moving from inception towards death (flow) and flow represents constant change; while both true and false represent forms ignorance thereof?
Could ti be that us consenting to the suggestions of others causes us to believe "true"; which then allows others to contradict it aka "false"? Does nature offer false information?
I'm with dagthegnome on this one. Normies absorb Leftist narratives, but they are swayed fairly easily because they know they don't know a lot of things. That's the Left's primary trick: calling them ignorant and laughing at dissent as if their position is normal.
It doesn't work in all cases, typically emotional appeal works, but in some cases fact based arguments do work.
Complaints about the Coronavirus origin, treatments, and lockdowns are finally bubbling up because Scientists kept individually investigating and found that the consensus was consistently wrong
Historians basically attacked the 1619 project from all directions, despite major efforts to get it inserted from the media and Leftist politics.
In your experience, has this ever worked on leftists? Being factually wrong and hypocritical is their normal state.
Again, you're not trying to convince leftists. They really are in it for the power. You're trying to convince normies. Most people still aren't living their lives subsumed by the culture war.
It's not a lie to argue against CRT on the basis that it's ahistorical and factually wrong.
I love how you're totally dismissing that CRT is anti-white in nature. Are you a shaboz? Asking for a friend.
Consent to any suggested -ism is what creates a hierarchy under false authority; because to consent to suggestion represents using free will to consent to a suggestion made by the free will of another. Free will represents the sole authority over self; consenting to the free will of another represents the ignorance thereof.
It is the free will of those who suggest the -isms that then has the power to define the narrative (the mainstream) for all who consent to believe it.
What if we are form within flow aka life (form) moving from inception towards death (flow) and flow represents constant change; while both true and false represent forms ignorance thereof?
Could ti be that us consenting to the suggestions of others causes us to believe "true"; which then allows others to contradict it aka "false"? Does nature offer false information?
I'm with dagthegnome on this one. Normies absorb Leftist narratives, but they are swayed fairly easily because they know they don't know a lot of things. That's the Left's primary trick: calling them ignorant and laughing at dissent as if their position is normal.
It doesn't work in all cases, typically emotional appeal works, but in some cases fact based arguments do work.
Complaints about the Coronavirus origin, treatments, and lockdowns are finally bubbling up because Scientists kept individually investigating and found that the consensus was consistently wrong
Historians basically attacked the 1619 project from all directions, despite major efforts to get it inserted from the media and Leftist politics.