Calling a married dude a degenerate because consistently talks about whether he wants to fuck the guys in the OP is ID politics
https://ibb.co/F06PykG https://ibb.co/ZfzFrYT
But providing a screenshot of said manchild following you to other subs is just a claim even when he admits it
Pedophilia is a protected gender.
That guy absolutely is a degenerate.
Not according to the entirely impartial mod who also told me in modmail that I needed to refer to him as a homosexual and not as gay
I love that you make yourself look like a total fool by complaining about that.
Apparently, you're not even aware that 'gay' is the PC term for homosexual. Gay means happy, which homosexuals sadly often are not due to consequences.
Lmao dude you were trying to word police me and now suddenly you're just trying stop the "PC"
Yes, mocking you for using PC words is quite appropriate.
Overwhelmingly white, I"m sure.
Woah when I click on the first link here, I get different images on different pulls. One of them has a quote about 'overwhelmingly white" that I'm not sure has anything to do with this
You guys use the same login in reddit?
You guys use reddit?
Based on your long history, it was far more likely aimed at the fact that this guy is homosexual. We get it. You don't like homosexuals. It's fine with me, but it doesn't mean you can violate sitewide rules by labeling a user as 'degenerate' for that.
Which he had already deleted by the time I got to it. So...
I was literally having a conversation with him about his utter lack of respect for his marriage. Apparently you cant separate your own love of cock from your moderation which is why you ignored that I called him a degenerate specifically for constantly talking about fucking other dudes while being married.
It doesn't matter if he deleted it. He followed me to other subs to harrass me and admitted such. You act like saying whoopsie I take it back removed the harrassment.
I can't imagine why anyone would think that your comment was driven by bias. Anyway, I don't care, but it was a sitewide violation. Hell, one comment of my own was removed for saying "and the world degenerates further" when talking about a tranny who was put on the cover of Sports Illustrated. So I'm not going to make any chances with this.
P.S. He has been banned more often than you have been.
Users are not punished for comments that they have already deleted. Even KiA does not do that. And you really disgrace yourself by calling that 'harassment', as retarded as that comment was. Pixels on a screen are not harassment, neither yours to him, nor his to you.
Lmao yeah I'm not going to be nice to you when calling you out for the blatant bias you're showing. Clearly you cant separate being bisexual from your moderation.
Idc how often he's banned. He wasn't banned in this occasion for something he admitted to.
So what is Antonio, are you autistically enforcing sitewides or not. You jumped through hoops to make my comment about him being gay as if I wouldn't just straight up say that if it were what it was about, like I did with your bias, but him admitting to doing what is harrassment per reddits sitewide rules isnt harrassment according to you nor is it a sitewide you'll enforce. He was going to completely different subs leaving comments beneath mine and you even acknowledge it was against the rules.
Yeah the original sub wouldn't enforce that shit against their cronies either. That's a failure not a positive
Be my guest, I don't care.
There was no need to jump through any hoops, really.
It is a sitewide, but since he had already deleted the comments (which you admitted), it was moot by that point.
Earlier you said: "Idc how often he's banned." Now you claim that rules are not enforced against "cronies". Even though you also acknowledged that I have called him out, which would make him not a crony.
Anyway. Since you can't muster any refutation or even a counter-argument, scream into the void.
You putting your fingers in your ears and going lalalala like you're fucking shadist doesn't suddenly mean I didn't give a counter argument
The admins do enforce sitewides agaisnt deleted comments especially harassment and pedophilia and guess which he did. I know because I used to mod and am still apart of the discord for a million+ sub
That is incorrect. They only enforce sitewides against removed comments, but even that is rare.
No they also enforce them against deleted comments because they can still see them
Imagine behaving just like the shitheads in the original sub where you can just make shit up in your head to justify bans because you dont like people's prior comments
Except that I do like your prior comments. According to RES, you are +5 for me. You have also followed the sitewide rules, stupid though they may be, quite well up unto this point. Here you stepped over the line. Whether you intended it or not, it will be read the way I did.
Yet you spent the whole time prior refusing to acknowledge that my comments weren't about him being gay even though we were literally arguing about why it's wrong to lust after other people while married.
If you'd have said that they could be misconstrued as being because he's gay we wouldn't have this problem but that's obviously not why you banned me not to mention you banned me in the first place while leaving him unbanned inspite of breaking sitewide rules and admitting he'd done so.
You're like the people who see someone get pissed that adults are putting their dongs in kids faces at pride parades and then start yelling about how being pissed at them makes you homophobic because the only reason someone could have a problem with that is because they hate teh gays. No it's because I'm tired of seeing him constantly talk about wanting to fuck random dudes and then a few comments later talking about how those mean conservatives wree trying to prevent his "right" to marriage when he clearly doesn't give a damn about his marriage. I dont even think marriage is a right at all. Civil unions arguably are.
Also you keep talking about my history of hating the gays when my only comments on them are about leaving children out of it, marriage not being a right, the slippery slope not being an inherent fallacy and disagreeing with murdering them. Which of these exactly do you have a problem with?
See, this is why replying to you is pointless, as you just repeat what you said before, even when it's refuted 5 times before. People are not punished for breaking rules when they've already deleted those comments. I'm sure you'd be outraged and claim 'bias' if you had deleted your comments and I banned you anyway.
To say 'misconstrued' means that I know how you intended it. I don't. Given your history, I did think that you meant that (and 'bitch boy' too) as an attack on the fact that he is a homosexual, which violates sitewides.
Marriage certainly is a right, as denying arbitrarily the right to marry a member of the opposite sex and have legitimate children to pass property on to is a grievous violation of historically acknowledged rights. Civil unions came into existence as a legal concept in the late 20th century, and as such cannot be 'rights' at all.
None of those. But your comment in this thread alone only confirmed that idea. I don't have a "problem" with it, you're entitled to like or dislike anyone for whatever reason, but it seems that you do have a problem with homosexuals - beyond reasonable problems.
Lmao dipshit you know how I intended it because I literally stated how I intended it, wrote out a paragraph emphasizing it and the whole conversation was about his infidelity.
Should I post screenshot of you acknowledging in modmail that he acts like a bitch?
You clearly have a bias because you keep insisting that inspite of me and your degenerate friend having an entire argument about his infidelity that in actuality it was because he is gay. All his comments about how I should be talking about fucking random women while in relationship must be because I'm straight. Clearly ID politics and he should be banned
Like I said, you don't have any refutations or counter-arguments, you just repeat the same old, same old.
So I repeat facts and thr truth and you just ignore that. Wtf do you expect me to do? Start lying and claiming it was all because he's gay.
That is the counter argument dipshit. You just saying no that isn't true isnt a counter argument. "Omg he isnt falling on his knees and saying I'm right that means he hasn't refuted my bullshit argument that he committed a thought crime." Kafka traps only make you look like a fool
Yeah dude despite our whole conversation revolving around his infidelity it was clearly just him being gay. Lol definitely no bias from the bisexual dude who just happened to claim it was because he's gay and keeps whining that I dont support the LGBT so any negative interaction I have with homosexual is because they're homosexual.
You sound like the people who start screeching that people who don't like children having dongs in their faces at pride parades are homophobic and not just you know opposed to children being exposed to such things. Clearly being gay is the only reason anyone would get tired of a dude who constantly talks fucking other men while simultaneously complaining that his marriage isn't respected because he's gay
His comment must have been heterophobic since he kept talking about it being bad that I wouldn't post shit about wanting to fuck other women while in relationship because clearly the conversation was about sexual orientation
As shown by your constant sad potshots at me. You clearly have issues.
Not anyone. You specifically.
My potshots at you are specifically because you're clearly modding based on your biases from being lgbt yourself but you can keep pretending that you cant read or that I've ever tiptoed around calling out LGBT when I have a problem with something related to their homosexuality etc.
You're also once again admitting to assigning motives based on bias while whining that you dont do that.