Calling a married dude a degenerate because consistently talks about whether he wants to fuck the guys in the OP is ID politics
https://ibb.co/F06PykG https://ibb.co/ZfzFrYT
But providing a screenshot of said manchild following you to other subs is just a claim even when he admits it
Based on your long history, it was far more likely aimed at the fact that this guy is homosexual. We get it. You don't like homosexuals. It's fine with me, but it doesn't mean you can violate sitewide rules by labeling a user as 'degenerate' for that.
Which he had already deleted by the time I got to it. So...
I was literally having a conversation with him about his utter lack of respect for his marriage. Apparently you cant separate your own love of cock from your moderation which is why you ignored that I called him a degenerate specifically for constantly talking about fucking other dudes while being married.
It doesn't matter if he deleted it. He followed me to other subs to harrass me and admitted such. You act like saying whoopsie I take it back removed the harrassment.
I can't imagine why anyone would think that your comment was driven by bias. Anyway, I don't care, but it was a sitewide violation. Hell, one comment of my own was removed for saying "and the world degenerates further" when talking about a tranny who was put on the cover of Sports Illustrated. So I'm not going to make any chances with this.
P.S. He has been banned more often than you have been.
Users are not punished for comments that they have already deleted. Even KiA does not do that. And you really disgrace yourself by calling that 'harassment', as retarded as that comment was. Pixels on a screen are not harassment, neither yours to him, nor his to you.
Lmao yeah I'm not going to be nice to you when calling you out for the blatant bias you're showing. Clearly you cant separate being bisexual from your moderation.
Idc how often he's banned. He wasn't banned in this occasion for something he admitted to.
So what is Antonio, are you autistically enforcing sitewides or not. You jumped through hoops to make my comment about him being gay as if I wouldn't just straight up say that if it were what it was about, like I did with your bias, but him admitting to doing what is harrassment per reddits sitewide rules isnt harrassment according to you nor is it a sitewide you'll enforce. He was going to completely different subs leaving comments beneath mine and you even acknowledge it was against the rules.
Yeah the original sub wouldn't enforce that shit against their cronies either. That's a failure not a positive
Be my guest, I don't care.
There was no need to jump through any hoops, really.
It is a sitewide, but since he had already deleted the comments (which you admitted), it was moot by that point.
Earlier you said: "Idc how often he's banned." Now you claim that rules are not enforced against "cronies". Even though you also acknowledged that I have called him out, which would make him not a crony.
Anyway. Since you can't muster any refutation or even a counter-argument, scream into the void.
Imagine behaving just like the shitheads in the original sub where you can just make shit up in your head to justify bans because you dont like people's prior comments
Except that I do like your prior comments. According to RES, you are +5 for me. You have also followed the sitewide rules, stupid though they may be, quite well up unto this point. Here you stepped over the line. Whether you intended it or not, it will be read the way I did.
Yet you spent the whole time prior refusing to acknowledge that my comments weren't about him being gay even though we were literally arguing about why it's wrong to lust after other people while married.
If you'd have said that they could be misconstrued as being because he's gay we wouldn't have this problem but that's obviously not why you banned me not to mention you banned me in the first place while leaving him unbanned inspite of breaking sitewide rules and admitting he'd done so.
You're like the people who see someone get pissed that adults are putting their dongs in kids faces at pride parades and then start yelling about how being pissed at them makes you homophobic because the only reason someone could have a problem with that is because they hate teh gays. No it's because I'm tired of seeing him constantly talk about wanting to fuck random dudes and then a few comments later talking about how those mean conservatives wree trying to prevent his "right" to marriage when he clearly doesn't give a damn about his marriage. I dont even think marriage is a right at all. Civil unions arguably are.
Also you keep talking about my history of hating the gays when my only comments on them are about leaving children out of it, marriage not being a right, the slippery slope not being an inherent fallacy and disagreeing with murdering them. Which of these exactly do you have a problem with?
See, this is why replying to you is pointless, as you just repeat what you said before, even when it's refuted 5 times before. People are not punished for breaking rules when they've already deleted those comments. I'm sure you'd be outraged and claim 'bias' if you had deleted your comments and I banned you anyway.
To say 'misconstrued' means that I know how you intended it. I don't. Given your history, I did think that you meant that (and 'bitch boy' too) as an attack on the fact that he is a homosexual, which violates sitewides.
Marriage certainly is a right, as denying arbitrarily the right to marry a member of the opposite sex and have legitimate children to pass property on to is a grievous violation of historically acknowledged rights. Civil unions came into existence as a legal concept in the late 20th century, and as such cannot be 'rights' at all.
None of those. But your comment in this thread alone only confirmed that idea. I don't have a "problem" with it, you're entitled to like or dislike anyone for whatever reason, but it seems that you do have a problem with homosexuals - beyond reasonable problems.