“Machine learning fairness”. We don’t want to make it seem like that just because there’s a 92.5% chance the black guy will dip out on the mulatto baby that there is the possibility there’s one white women happy being a single mom with a black kid.
I have a friend who sends me screenshots of the FB posts of a girl he knows. She posts boomer memes about "dead beat baby daddies" multiple times a day and has a whole group of other white women who have the same experience of getting knocked up and left by black men. The funniest part to me is they not only think this is somehow cool, but they all still fetishize black men.
However, the sources of the photos between the 2 sites are vastly different.
Google looked to be pulling pictures from articles. DDG seems to pull mainly from stock photos. The types up pictures pulled up by the algorithm due to phrasing could conceivably be vastly different.
Not saying that Google is not a racist, woke piece of crap, it is... but it is not so clear cut in this case.
I really would not put it past them. The only reason I play devils advocate on this is that it is something a leftist can come in and throw serious doubts on or even disapprove. They then would use this to call us conspiracy theorists and use it to say that every thing else we believe is wrong.
They like to do that sort of thing.
Figure if we are going to get mad at Google, the are plenty of things we can prove without focusing on a search that could have other, logical, reasoning being the results.
Google is crap... but I am going to devil's advocate here for a moment.
If you look up just "Happy woman" they are mostly pictures of white women.
Hispanic, Asian, black... they often state the race when they write an article or post a picture, so the algorithm picks that up. White people, not so much. White people mainly just identified as people unless they commit a crime or are in a biracial relationship so that is what the results would logically show.
That being said, if it gets around to Google that looking up "happy woman" has a lot of white people in the result, I am sure they would change the results because, again, they are crap.
Also looking up "beautiful woman". Even more white than "Happy woman".
"Happy black woman" is alone.
Not gonna lie, that's fucking hilarious. Tragic, but hilarious.
“Machine learning fairness”. We don’t want to make it seem like that just because there’s a 92.5% chance the black guy will dip out on the mulatto baby that there is the possibility there’s one white women happy being a single mom with a black kid.
I have a friend who sends me screenshots of the FB posts of a girl he knows. She posts boomer memes about "dead beat baby daddies" multiple times a day and has a whole group of other white women who have the same experience of getting knocked up and left by black men. The funniest part to me is they not only think this is somehow cool, but they all still fetishize black men.
Google is explicitly anti-white and advocates for White replacement.
I’m pretty sure this has been established since 2018. Googling “Men can...” is also pretty horrifying.
Definently a difference, no doubt...
However, the sources of the photos between the 2 sites are vastly different.
Google looked to be pulling pictures from articles. DDG seems to pull mainly from stock photos. The types up pictures pulled up by the algorithm due to phrasing could conceivably be vastly different.
Not saying that Google is not a racist, woke piece of crap, it is... but it is not so clear cut in this case.
Google uses stock photos too.
I really would not put it past them. The only reason I play devils advocate on this is that it is something a leftist can come in and throw serious doubts on or even disapprove. They then would use this to call us conspiracy theorists and use it to say that every thing else we believe is wrong.
They like to do that sort of thing.
Figure if we are going to get mad at Google, the are plenty of things we can prove without focusing on a search that could have other, logical, reasoning being the results.
Happy white women are only happy when they are the center of attention.
Fitting user name.
Google is crap... but I am going to devil's advocate here for a moment.
If you look up just "Happy woman" they are mostly pictures of white women.
Hispanic, Asian, black... they often state the race when they write an article or post a picture, so the algorithm picks that up. White people, not so much. White people mainly just identified as people unless they commit a crime or are in a biracial relationship so that is what the results would logically show.
That being said, if it gets around to Google that looking up "happy woman" has a lot of white people in the result, I am sure they would change the results because, again, they are crap.
Also looking up "beautiful woman". Even more white than "Happy woman".