This is the same guy who mischaracterized Gamergate and defended Anita, so it's no wonder that he's saying stuff like that.
Personally I don't think exposing kids to healthy sexuality is bad. That means things like nudity or the concept of sex in general. It's very bad when it's a distorted and corrupted view of sexuality for the sake of only personal gratification, that should be prevented.
Of course it's up to the discretion of parents in general, and they should have supervision over what young kids do online.
It's so ODD anyone would have a problem with men in fetish harnesses and leather g-strings and dog masks out in public getting friendly with kids. How ODD one must be to see any issue with this totally normal and not-odd behavior.
Yeah that image is the classic example of corruption. Right up there with drag queen story hour, and prepubescent "trans" children preforming in front of a crowd.
Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal, but somehow in bad taste. On the evening news, one sees handcuffed teachers, priests and Boy Scout leaders hustled into police vans. Therapists call them maladjusted, emotionally immature. But beauty has its own laws, inconsistent with Christian morality. As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of its civilization.
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate sit in somebody's lap or engage in sexual activity.
-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble
Naked kids have been a staple of delight for centuries, for both parents and onlookers. So to label pedophilia as criminal is ridiculous.
-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA
This notion of consent is a trap, in any case. What is sure is that the legal form of an intersexual consent is nonsense. No one signs a contract before making love... When we say that children are 'consenting' in these cases, all we intend to say is this: in any case, there was no violence, or organized manipulation in order to wrench out of them affective or erotic relations.
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Like communists and homosexuals in the 1950s, boylovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders for their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation.
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
But pederasty is probably historically the most common form of homosexuality in Western culture, as well as many other cultures. It exists in all cultures, and in some is considered the norm, even today (e.g., Iran, among the Pashtuns). To label it 'child abuse' or 'child molestation' is preposterous and stupid.
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
It is not necessary to figure parent-child incest as a unilateral impingement on the child by the parent, since whatever impingement takes place will also be registered within the sphere of fantasy. In fact, to understand the violation that incest can be and also to distinguish between those occasions of incest that are violation and those that are not it is unnecessary to figure the body of the child exclusively as a surface imposed upon from the outside... The reification of the child’s body as passive surface would thus constitute, at a theoretical level, a further deprivation of the child: the deprivation of psychic life.
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
But, after all, listening to a child, hearing him speak, hearing him explain what his relations actually were with someone, adult or not, provided one listens with enough sympathy, must allow one to establish more or less what degree of violence if any was used or what degree of consent was given. And to assume that a child is incapable of explaining what happened and was incapable of giving his consent are two abuses that are intolerable, quite unacceptable.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reedraped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
There is no excuse to not understand why we age gate things. Children cannot understand or consent to the colossal consequences - medical, psychological, social or otherwise attached to sex. Therefore we do not want to normalise or introduce them to these acts until they can.
No he’s not talking about sex ed, and basic conversations of biology. Which of course need to be taught. The wider context is discussing & defending kids attending highly sexualised events:
i’m dying on the hill that children should not be anywhere near adult themed shit. whether that be drag shows or kink. and if the overton window has shifted so far that i’m a reactionary for this take then so be it.
Parents are still the least likely to abuse their own kid!
Umm... About that...
They're the most likely. If a kid is abused, the first look should immediately be at the parents, since that will uncover the perp in most cases.
Not saying a societal expectation that parents actually, you know, parent, isn't a good thing to want or to strive towards, but yeah, parents aren't the most unabusive entities.
It's the same as saying that white people are the most likely to commit rape in the U.S. It's technically true, but that's only because there are more white people in the U.S., and adjusted for per-capita numbers tells a completely different story.
No he’s not talking about sex ed, and basic conversations of biology. Which of course need to be taught.
It's not obvious that sex ed needs to be taught in school, and the religious right in retrospect was quite correct in the 80s when they predicted it would lead to teaching children about condom usage, gay sex, and fetishes (the existence of which are basic facts about sex and biology, putting aside moral arguments for or against them).
It's also a basic fact of biology/anthropology that humans tend to segregate themselves into tribes and along racial/ethic lines and treat each members of other tribes, races, and ethnicities with suspicion and hostility. And that some humans have more aggressive tendencies and are more likely to commit rape and murder. Do we teach children those things in a "neutral" context, or do we preface those discussions with "and these things are all bad, so don't do them"
It is simply not possible to decouple education from a particular moral context. And the decision to include or exclude "basic conversations" on particular topics is itself a decision to some extent driven by morals and values, given the practically unlimited "basic conversations" that are possible and the limited time there is to teach them.
it would lead to teaching children about condom usage
Preventing kids from getting pregnancies/STDs seems pretty reasonable to me. Most people lose their virginity at 15/16, some even at 12/13, better to teach them how to do it safer make sense- the problem is some places refuse to teach abstinence which is as retarded as abstinence-only sex ed.
Preventing kids from getting pregnancies/STDs seems pretty reasonable to me
If you're Catholic, you probably don't want your children to be taught that their usage is an acceptable and reasonable alternative to abstinence when your religion says you shouldn't use them.
So, when are you both going to stop shilling for the female supremacist brainwashing that psychologically affects their sexuality greatly?
Oh? Never? Right...
Let me know when these freaks are going to start pushing to teach men of their value and devaluing women, then they can pretend to be caring about protecting kids.
Shoe is a leftist cuckold and Lauren is a race baiting tradthot.
Both are the epitome of female opposition to feminism. Completely fake and with an agenda of their own.
Why doesn't she talk about why migration is so common? About the economic reasons for growing the population, about women tanking the birth rate by being unlikable since 2016, eclipsing birth rate dips from economic crises? Easier to race bait than address the issue.
Lefties please stop justifying conservative strawmen arguments challenge 2021 Kink at pride is a bad. Children are there. Don't do kink around children. I literally cannot believe that this is the twitter discourse of the day like please anything else please
Here's my update: if you wanna have a kinky after-party at a bar or space away from children, that's great! Just ffs don't do that in spaces where children are at. Okay goodnight
This is the same guy who mischaracterized Gamergate and defended Anita, so it's no wonder that he's saying stuff like that.
Personally I don't think exposing kids to healthy sexuality is bad. That means things like nudity or the concept of sex in general. It's very bad when it's a distorted and corrupted view of sexuality for the sake of only personal gratification, that should be prevented.
Of course it's up to the discretion of parents in general, and they should have supervision over what young kids do online.
He's vigorously defending THIS: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E2G6R-lVUAI8aAB?format=jpg&name=medium
It's so ODD anyone would have a problem with men in fetish harnesses and leather g-strings and dog masks out in public getting friendly with kids. How ODD one must be to see any issue with this totally normal and not-odd behavior.
Yeah that image is the classic example of corruption. Right up there with drag queen story hour, and prepubescent "trans" children preforming in front of a crowd.
By performing you mean literally stripping while grown men throw dollar bills at them?
Bill de Blasio put pedos next to elementary schools. The Tavistock Clinic was doing mass medical tranny experimentation on children, but was fortunately slapped down recently by reactionary judges. In Germany, Dr Kentler gave foster kids to pedos, and green movement founder Daniel Cohn-Bendit bragged about a child sex daycare.
Globohomo's chomopomo prophets openly talk about their love of pedos:
-Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae
-Pat Califia, cited in Sexual Investigations by Soble
-Allen Ginsberg, The Liberation is the Word, literary author, gay activist and founding member of NAMBLA
-Guy Hocquenghem, Sexual Morality and the Law, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
-Gayle Rubin, Thinking Sex, widely regarded as a founding text of Gay/Lesbian studies and Queer Theory
-David Thorstad, rage email, president of both the Gay Activists Alliance and Coalition for Lesbian and Gay Rights in NYC in the 1970s, founder of the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), compared being a pederast in the US with being "a Jew in Nazi Germany"
-Judith Butler, Undoing Gender, most influential living gender theorist. She sees incest taboo as working towards heteronormativity and asks that prohibition on incest be rethought to prevent the "violation" that is heteronormativity.
-John Money, Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia, psychologist who forced a boy to be a girl and get humped by his twin brother after a botched circumcision. Both of the Reimer brothers committed suicide.
-Michel Foucault, The Danger of Child Sexuality, Pope of Chomopomo, most cited academic in grievance studies, signer of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws
Other notable globohomo clergy:
Judge Brett Blomme, organizer of Drag Queen Story hour, made child porn in his home.
Henry "Harry" Hay, pioneer in US Gay rights, founder of the first sustained gay rights group in the US. Supported NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) and marched in the pride parade with a "NAMBLA walks with me" shirt.
Magnus Hirschfeld founder in 1897 of an institute deemed "the first advocacy for homosexual and transgender rights", considered homosexual "ephebophiles" as something common and nonpathological.
Simone de Beauvoir, lesbian feminist superhero second to none, of "every woman is homosexual by nature" fame, was one of the signers of the 1977 petition against age of consent laws demanding "recognition of the right of children and adolescents to maintain relationships with persons of their choice". It was in reaction to three men being taken to trial for grooming boys and girls under 15 years of age, but allegedly "without violence".
Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in California, of Oscar winning biopic about his life, and has a Navy ship named after him. Milk took advantage of his work with at-risk youth to groom at least one 16yo runaway Jack Galen McKinley who had substance abuse problems and lived on the streets of NYC (where the age of consent was 17). Jack would end up comitting suicide years later.
Pedowood is just the tip of pomochomo media:
Victor Salva's rape of his 12 year old actor is defended by intelligensia allies like John Edgar Browning.
Wikipedia is more pozzed than Charlie Sheen:
Rodney Reed raped a 12 year old and wikipedia covered it up for Shaun King's BLM bullshit.
Plebbit is run by tranny pedos.
tl;dr Not fucking children is somehow child abuse.
Last updated 18 April 2021
I'd prefer gas.
https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1396598947364294656
https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1396602185027244035
https://web.archive.org/web/20210523225903/https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/status/1396592520881135619
Umm... About that...
They're the most likely. If a kid is abused, the first look should immediately be at the parents, since that will uncover the perp in most cases.
Not saying a societal expectation that parents actually, you know, parent, isn't a good thing to want or to strive towards, but yeah, parents aren't the most unabusive entities.
In absolute numbers, yes. Not per-capita.
It's the same as saying that white people are the most likely to commit rape in the U.S. It's technically true, but that's only because there are more white people in the U.S., and adjusted for per-capita numbers tells a completely different story.
It's not obvious that sex ed needs to be taught in school, and the religious right in retrospect was quite correct in the 80s when they predicted it would lead to teaching children about condom usage, gay sex, and fetishes (the existence of which are basic facts about sex and biology, putting aside moral arguments for or against them).
It's also a basic fact of biology/anthropology that humans tend to segregate themselves into tribes and along racial/ethic lines and treat each members of other tribes, races, and ethnicities with suspicion and hostility. And that some humans have more aggressive tendencies and are more likely to commit rape and murder. Do we teach children those things in a "neutral" context, or do we preface those discussions with "and these things are all bad, so don't do them"
It is simply not possible to decouple education from a particular moral context. And the decision to include or exclude "basic conversations" on particular topics is itself a decision to some extent driven by morals and values, given the practically unlimited "basic conversations" that are possible and the limited time there is to teach them.
Preventing kids from getting pregnancies/STDs seems pretty reasonable to me. Most people lose their virginity at 15/16, some even at 12/13, better to teach them how to do it safer make sense- the problem is some places refuse to teach abstinence which is as retarded as abstinence-only sex ed.
If you're Catholic, you probably don't want your children to be taught that their usage is an acceptable and reasonable alternative to abstinence when your religion says you shouldn't use them.
So, when are you both going to stop shilling for the female supremacist brainwashing that psychologically affects their sexuality greatly?
Oh? Never? Right...
Let me know when these freaks are going to start pushing to teach men of their value and devaluing women, then they can pretend to be caring about protecting kids.
As it is, it's just a deflection.
By female supremacist brainwashing did you mean feminism? Because both of them are vocal critics of it.
Shoe is a leftist cuckold and Lauren is a race baiting tradthot.
Both are the epitome of female opposition to feminism. Completely fake and with an agenda of their own.
Why doesn't she talk about why migration is so common? About the economic reasons for growing the population, about women tanking the birth rate by being unlikable since 2016, eclipsing birth rate dips from economic crises? Easier to race bait than address the issue.
Riley is a trans leftist: https://twitter.com/RileyGRoshong/status/1396652029100056577
bring back crucifixion for pedo faggots.
Yes, drag an aimless chancer like Shoe0nhead into the argument. There's no way to better make yourself into a farce than by invoking another farce.