Depends on whether a court strikes it down. If I were one of these loons, I'd leave well enough alone instead of tempting fate by constantly pushing things too far.
Fair, but the legal precedent for taxation of breathing is established (your carbon emissions are interstate commerce). Popularity is a fickle but controllable thing, if you have enough megaphones.
Just more puzzled by why he frames it as "try". They successfully get away with nonsense constantly. Of course they continue.
Depends on whether a court strikes it down. If I were one of these loons, I'd leave well enough alone instead of tempting fate by constantly pushing things too far.
Are we still making the mistake of putting faith in courts? How naive are you?
I mean... that's what they've done since FDR. You're familiar with Wickard v Filburn, right?
It was carte blanche permission.
Not really, it's one thing to push things that are massively popular vs. things that are massively unpopular.
Fair, but the legal precedent for taxation of breathing is established (your carbon emissions are interstate commerce). Popularity is a fickle but controllable thing, if you have enough megaphones.