The purpose of a marriage is to have children, that's why we have the concept of it in the first place. Any marriage that does not produce children is either fake or a failure.
tbh the concept of marriage being backed by a state really bugs the fuck out of me. It unnecessarily puts a GOVERNMENT in place of something that was originally a religious tradition.
You shouldn't have to have a fuckin' marriage LOICENSE for something that your religion freely advocates.
I know some ethnotrads actually support having the state enforcing marriage between man and a woman because it encourages the making of HOMOGENOUS ethno babbies and maintains a stable family and societal structure, but at the same time the marriage between the church and government also has allowed the far left to capture the government and fuck men and fathers over in divorces/instances where the father has been 100% in the right yet the gynocentric society has simped for the woman.
With the exception of those who have some kind of medical condition that prevents it. A man shooting blanks or woman not producing viable eggs is no ones fault and I would not go as far as to say their marriage is fake or a failure. They could still adopt or play an important role in their niece or nephews lives.
If they cannot have a child then they failed to pass on their genetics. It's not their fault, but it is the outcome. Adopting a child or helping out with their family's children are of course very noble and positive, but it's not why they got married in the first place.
That is the corrupted form of it. There is a reason marriage is supposed to be "Till death do we part" not "After you have enough money I'll leave and take whatever I can"
And she was required to keep his home upkept and his children properly raised.
I can tell you from experience I am well willing to pay the majority of my bills alone to have my food cooked, my laundry done, and my house clean, leaving me to relax and not worry after working all day.
It was a good thing when the roles of it were rigidly enforced by social shaming, so both parties felt the burn to keep up their side of the bargain. Women especially were under far harsher scrutiny to maintain their side because of how much easier their side was.
The purpose of a marriage is to have children, that's why we have the concept of it in the first place. Any marriage that does not produce children is either fake or a failure.
tbh the concept of marriage being backed by a state really bugs the fuck out of me. It unnecessarily puts a GOVERNMENT in place of something that was originally a religious tradition.
You shouldn't have to have a fuckin' marriage LOICENSE for something that your religion freely advocates.
I know some ethnotrads actually support having the state enforcing marriage between man and a woman because it encourages the making of HOMOGENOUS ethno babbies and maintains a stable family and societal structure, but at the same time the marriage between the church and government also has allowed the far left to capture the government and fuck men and fathers over in divorces/instances where the father has been 100% in the right yet the gynocentric society has simped for the woman.
Wonder how we can resolve this.
If the state is involved, it should be for civil unions and that’s it.
With the exception of those who have some kind of medical condition that prevents it. A man shooting blanks or woman not producing viable eggs is no ones fault and I would not go as far as to say their marriage is fake or a failure. They could still adopt or play an important role in their niece or nephews lives.
If they cannot have a child then they failed to pass on their genetics. It's not their fault, but it is the outcome. Adopting a child or helping out with their family's children are of course very noble and positive, but it's not why they got married in the first place.
That is the corrupted form of it. There is a reason marriage is supposed to be "Till death do we part" not "After you have enough money I'll leave and take whatever I can"
And she was required to keep his home upkept and his children properly raised.
I can tell you from experience I am well willing to pay the majority of my bills alone to have my food cooked, my laundry done, and my house clean, leaving me to relax and not worry after working all day.
It was a good thing when the roles of it were rigidly enforced by social shaming, so both parties felt the burn to keep up their side of the bargain. Women especially were under far harsher scrutiny to maintain their side because of how much easier their side was.
You have a very distorted view of history, when it comes to male and female relations. I would suggest watching this video.