I still think Tucker Carlson is controlled opposition on certain issues. Tucker was silent on voter fraud and soft on Hunter Biden.
I will say Tucker is still better than Kamala Harris and his personality would be an asset to win the Rust Belt.
I would vote for anyone with decent right wing populist policies who also has a real shot to win and prevent Harris 2024.
Hawley has good populist policies but he is a hard no for me in terms of being the 2024 nominee.
If Republican voters vote for him in the primaries then it will be a guaranteed loss in the general even if you prevent voter fraud due to Hawley's lack of charisma.
If the GOP has the audacity to rig in a neocon nominee like Liz Cheney, Nikki Haley or Larry Hogan, I would not even bother to vote.
The cancerous neocons need to be removed from the party.
I still think Tucker Carlson is controlled opposition on certain issues.
Oh Christ. Inform me when you find someone who isn't "controlled opposition".
Tucker was silent on voter fraud and soft on Hunter Biden.
He called out Sidney Powell for her evidence-less BS, which discredited the real issues, and he said that he sympathizes with the junkie as a person - as do many people, especially those who encounter it in their families.
If Republican voters vote for him in the primaries then it will be a guaranteed loss in the general even if you prevent voter fraud due to Hawley's lack of charisma.
I am not sure. It's not as if Harris/Biden have charisma coming out of their wazoo.
Most mainstream politicians and pundits are controlled opposition in some shape or form. The globalist uniparty dominates the major institutions after all.
With how many people betrayed Trump during his 4 years, it is clear to me that anyone in power can be bought or blackmailed or threatened.
Tucker did not talk much about any of the mail in ballot rule changes and ballot fraud. None of that has anything to do with Sidney Powell.
He was soft on Hunter because it is alleged that Hunter Biden wrote the letter of recommendation for Tucker's son Buckley. An email about that was posted on thedonald.win
Hawley doesn't really have a shot in the Rust belt according to the most accurate pollster, Richard Baris.
Most mainstream politicians and pundits are controlled opposition in some shape or form. The globalist uniparty dominates the major institutions after all.
The reason they smear him non-stop is because they cannot control him.
Tucker did not talk much about any of the mail in ballot rule changes and ballot fraud. None of that has anything to do with Sidney Powell.
I distinctly recall you - or others - getting upset with him, because he called out the fact that Sidney Powell had not provided any evidence whatsoever for her claims. Like the rest of what Tucker says, this turned out to be true.
He was soft on Hunter because it is alleged that Hunter Biden wrote the letter of recommendation for Tucker's son Buckley.
You really expect me to take that seriously? Tucker is a gentle fellow, so he focused on the personal corruption of Joe Biden. There was absolutely no reason at all to talk about his son's many problems.
Hawley doesn't really have a shot in the Rust belt according to the most accurate pollster, Richard Baris.
He has 0 name recognition. I think his populism will play well there.
DeSantis has negative charisma.
So has Hawley, my personal favorite.
Tucker is a great guy, I am glad that you came around regarding him, but I am not sure how he would fare as a politician.
I still think Tucker Carlson is controlled opposition on certain issues. Tucker was silent on voter fraud and soft on Hunter Biden.
I will say Tucker is still better than Kamala Harris and his personality would be an asset to win the Rust Belt.
I would vote for anyone with decent right wing populist policies who also has a real shot to win and prevent Harris 2024.
Hawley has good populist policies but he is a hard no for me in terms of being the 2024 nominee.
If Republican voters vote for him in the primaries then it will be a guaranteed loss in the general even if you prevent voter fraud due to Hawley's lack of charisma.
If the GOP has the audacity to rig in a neocon nominee like Liz Cheney, Nikki Haley or Larry Hogan, I would not even bother to vote.
The cancerous neocons need to be removed from the party.
Oh Christ. Inform me when you find someone who isn't "controlled opposition".
He called out Sidney Powell for her evidence-less BS, which discredited the real issues, and he said that he sympathizes with the junkie as a person - as do many people, especially those who encounter it in their families.
I am not sure. It's not as if Harris/Biden have charisma coming out of their wazoo.
Most mainstream politicians and pundits are controlled opposition in some shape or form. The globalist uniparty dominates the major institutions after all.
With how many people betrayed Trump during his 4 years, it is clear to me that anyone in power can be bought or blackmailed or threatened.
Tucker did not talk much about any of the mail in ballot rule changes and ballot fraud. None of that has anything to do with Sidney Powell.
He was soft on Hunter because it is alleged that Hunter Biden wrote the letter of recommendation for Tucker's son Buckley. An email about that was posted on thedonald.win
Hawley doesn't really have a shot in the Rust belt according to the most accurate pollster, Richard Baris.
The reason they smear him non-stop is because they cannot control him.
I distinctly recall you - or others - getting upset with him, because he called out the fact that Sidney Powell had not provided any evidence whatsoever for her claims. Like the rest of what Tucker says, this turned out to be true.
You really expect me to take that seriously? Tucker is a gentle fellow, so he focused on the personal corruption of Joe Biden. There was absolutely no reason at all to talk about his son's many problems.
He has 0 name recognition. I think his populism will play well there.