I'm sure you have all noticed this from various comment boards to Reddit and 4chan. "I'm a Christian but (communist bullshit)" or "I was a Republican but (more communist bullshit)". It never turns out well, the atheists will still say youre an idiot as will progressives. Why placate them? Why does nobody stand up for their beliefs? Are we that scared of cancel culture or are we just that scared of possibly offending someone? Who will be the first to say, "This is what I think. Dont like it? Tough titties, now get out of my way".
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
Not every branch of Christianity are bigoted evangelicals.
I cannot say that the SJWs and communists don't mean well. At a very broad, conceptual level, a lot of what they say they want is compatible with what I perceive to be virtuous and a desirable direction for the world. It is only the fact that their ideas won't work and have been repeatedly shown to not work that puts me at odds with them.
Well, I'll do it for you. They don't mean well, they're driven by pure hate and envy. All they want to do is change the current system so they're on top.
They all have blood dripping from their hands.
And that makes them better than the Galt crowd... how, exactly?
You may not like it but if the argument is "solidarity" vs "got mine, fuck you", I know which side Christ is on. Even if the solidarity side is being duplicitous, at least they have the Christian definition of what virtue would look like.
Christianity considers societies led by women as godless.
If only tradcucks cared enough to enforce that like they whine about men not getting married.
No, certain major SECTS of Christianity think that.
That's Corinthians. Paul the self-identified Apostle.
There's no way to put this politely: FUCK PAUL.
Paul PERSECUTED the other apostles and then converted. He never knew JC, and everything he "contributed" to the faith is wrong.
It's clear you've little interest in even trying to be objective, given that you started with "bigoted evangelicals", "got mine, fuck you", "galtism" etc. But even if you were right about all of that, can you even name one thing that the modern progressives do which is remotely close to any Christian virtue? They're the polar opposite of it all.
Exactly! There was a video last year where some pastor or something stopped some dude and begged him to wear a mask at some kind of event. Literally on his knees and begged him to like just consider it. And don’t get me wrong, it was super cringey, but he was definitely going the Jesus angle and you’d think people would appreciate it. Instead, all the supposed “conservative” influencers and their fans were like look at this soy cuck beta whatever. “I’d never kneel for another man” type stuff. To answer OP, no ones standing up for whatever beliefs he’s projecting on to them because they probably never really had them in the first place.
Christianity begat Marxism.
At least Islam isn't Marxist.
All very true.
Realistically if nobody is going to pull a Joseph Smith over galtism, then islam is the next best course of action.
I doubt SJW are good people. The most hateful and intolerant persons I've ever seen are leftists. They want no middle ground, no compromise and end justifies the means.
I think most SJW types are power hungry bullies that would have been religious fanatics if they have lived in a different time.
It doesn't matter.
Whether their message is honest or dishonest, it's broadly compatible with the sermons.
Galtism is not.
This is a serious problem.
As I said elsewhere in this thread... SOMEONE is going to have to speak for god if galtism is to be made compatible with christianity.
I've never heard the end justify the means in Christianity, no where does it say, as far as I know, to discriminate on the bases on ones skin color for the perceived greater good. That we are not responsible for our own actions, we are just some stupid product of our skin color or sex. That killing, burning, looting, betraying ones parents to fight some perceived injustice that was done by someone dead long ago that shares the same skin color as the people you want to hurt today.
No, I see nothing in the manipulation and the fanaticism required of the SJW types that is in any way compatible with Christianity. I am agnostic so I may be wrong but I really doubt it.
Of course not.
Taken to its rational extreme, the SJWs exist because god wills it thus.
You know that Nigerian prince doesn't actually mean well when he asks you to just cover the bank's transfer fees, right?
The ideas don't work by design. They're not meant to provide solutions, only justification for an attack. Unless you believe the majority of the populace is functionally retarded then you have to know most people supporting those ideas aren't doing it because they thought it through and really think that's the most likely long term solution to various moral dilemmas. They're doing it because it either directly benefits them or hurts someone they hate in the immediate future. Most would just prefer having a nice sounding excuse to fall back on rather than openly admitting they're doing it out of spite and selfishness.
Depends on what they want the dollar for/how it's going to be used, and what the long-term repercussions of giving that dollar might be.
I mean, if I said a blanket "it's virtuous to feed a hungry animal" the fucking caveats would start, so ...
Oh, that and just blindly giving money out just because it's a human that asked, just gets you labelled as a "sucker".
I disagree with basically everything you said there.
Going one further I think of all the people I've replied to today you and I are probably the most out of sync in terms of our perspective on what is virtue.
You're a scrooge.
Yes.
And what I'm saying is that justification is rational when evaluated from a christian perspective.
If the question is: "was christ a marxist or a galtist", the answer is he was closer to marx than to galt.
Christianity condemns the violence, but it cannot disagree with the animus.
The animus is greed and spite. The justification is a weakly held facade.
Forgive me for thinking you're one of the more confused Christians I've ever met if you think the outward words are more important than the intent in the eyes of God.
Do you believe you have free will?
They mean well by imagining
Jewsclass enemies and arguing for oppression and extermination.https://archive.vn/UdIEM
https://archive.vn/OTWD1 https://www.projectveritas.com/news/pbs-principal-counsel-lays-out-violent-radical-agenda-says-americans-are-f/
Suspiciously similar to the fascists the left constantly warns us about.