I've long thought that if you ran a DNA test on Harry you'd have a very real chance of Maury sitting there in front of Prince Charles, saying "You are NOT the father."
Bingo. I mean, everyone likes to act like Di was a saint that was so put upon by the royal family, but it's pretty obvious that she was letting someone else swim in the royal gene pool. Not that I can blame her, considering how much of a wanker Charles is and the shit he pulled on her. But, as is the case with most things related to the royals (and most aristocracy in general, for that matter), they conveniently ignore the blindingly obvious thing that everyone knows about rather than deal with the potential scandal and fallout. That being said, it's not like Harry's lineage really matters, unless William and his entire family somehow die in a plane crash,.
Yup, now that Gorge, Charlotte and Louis are a thing about the most Harry could expect was to be about as useful as Princes Andrew and Edward and Princess Anne.
The saddest thing is that for brief moment, it looked like Harry was actually going to turn out good;
He joined the army and went to war in Afghanistan, and was well liked by his unit. When he interacted with the public he acted like a regular guy, with no hint of royalty or upper class origins about him - nothing like Charles or Philip at all.
He looked so promising.
Now he looks like Edward VIII - a national embarassment.
You're a fool. It's nice to have an apolitical head of state. I think your head would have exploded if Theresa May and boris de Pfeffer were not just head of government, but head of state as well.
I don't understand the value of that. Also, as I said, once the Queen dies, the entire lineage is all useless climate cultists who would worship Greta Thunberg.
William seems the least bad of the bunch.
It's difficult to hate a 90+ year old who hasn't done anything.
I have a very high opinion of your talents when it comes to hating people who haven't done anything. But nice to see this anyway.
I have a very strong concern about him, considering Kate Middleton attended women's hate march not too long ago.
Women feel unsafe. You may argue that it's without reason, but they do. So I have no problems with her attending a march protesting against a murder, regardless of rabid feminist shrews trying to hijack it to make it all about their agenda, though I do think a march against unsafety is pointless.
I could never be as good at that as women are.
Don't misunderestimate yourself. I see a lot of feminists say stuff like "I hate men, but my husband is great". The funny thing is that he then turns out not to be the kind of castrated loser that they say they like.
Something something hard times strong men something something soft times Prince Harry.
Born and raised by those who praise control of population
Pay your surgeon very well
To break the spell of aging
Sicker than the rest, there is no test
But this is what you're craving
Destruction leads to a very rough road
But it also breeds creation
Dream of Californication
Well, everybody's been there
And I don't mean on vacation
Wink nod.
I've long thought that if you ran a DNA test on Harry you'd have a very real chance of Maury sitting there in front of Prince Charles, saying "You are NOT the father."
You and most of England. The resemblance to James Hewitt is pretty goddamn obvious.
Bingo. I mean, everyone likes to act like Di was a saint that was so put upon by the royal family, but it's pretty obvious that she was letting someone else swim in the royal gene pool. Not that I can blame her, considering how much of a wanker Charles is and the shit he pulled on her. But, as is the case with most things related to the royals (and most aristocracy in general, for that matter), they conveniently ignore the blindingly obvious thing that everyone knows about rather than deal with the potential scandal and fallout. That being said, it's not like Harry's lineage really matters, unless William and his entire family somehow die in a plane crash,.
Yup, now that Gorge, Charlotte and Louis are a thing about the most Harry could expect was to be about as useful as Princes Andrew and Edward and Princess Anne.
Progressives have never considered that entropy is an actual thing. We're very close to seeing a rude awakening.
The saddest thing is that for brief moment, it looked like Harry was actually going to turn out good;
He joined the army and went to war in Afghanistan, and was well liked by his unit. When he interacted with the public he acted like a regular guy, with no hint of royalty or upper class origins about him - nothing like Charles or Philip at all.
He looked so promising. Now he looks like Edward VIII - a national embarassment.
You're a fool. It's nice to have an apolitical head of state. I think your head would have exploded if Theresa May and boris de Pfeffer were not just head of government, but head of state as well.
That's the point, that it's only ceremonial, a unifying figure.
Am I to understand that you like the current Queen better than any of the nincompoops you just cited?
She really does do magic. God save the Queen.
William seems the least bad of the bunch.
I have a very high opinion of your talents when it comes to hating people who haven't done anything. But nice to see this anyway.
Women feel unsafe. You may argue that it's without reason, but they do. So I have no problems with her attending a march protesting against a murder, regardless of rabid feminist shrews trying to hijack it to make it all about their agenda, though I do think a march against unsafety is pointless.
Don't misunderestimate yourself. I see a lot of feminists say stuff like "I hate men, but my husband is great". The funny thing is that he then turns out not to be the kind of castrated loser that they say they like.