I have a very strong concern about him, considering Kate Middleton attended women's hate march not too long ago.
Women feel unsafe. You may argue that it's without reason, but they do. So I have no problems with her attending a march protesting against a murder, regardless of rabid feminist shrews trying to hijack it to make it all about their agenda, though I do think a march against unsafety is pointless.
I could never be as good at that as women are.
Don't misunderestimate yourself. I see a lot of feminists say stuff like "I hate men, but my husband is great". The funny thing is that he then turns out not to be the kind of castrated loser that they say they like.
No, they don't. That wasn't about safety, it was an opportunistic play to try and strip more rights from men. They got their misogyny law, so yet again it worked.
It's almost like feminists are trying to create an underclass of brainwashed idiots that they can abuse with impunity.
No, they don't. That wasn't about safety, it was an opportunistic play to try and strip more rights from men. They got their misogyny law, so yet again it worked.
They most certainly do, even if you want to claim that this was not the reason for the protest. I've had far too many experiences with ordinary, normal women and girls fearing for their safety to agree with this.
Now, what was it "about"? That is a simplification. For any protest, there are theoretically as many motivations as there are participants. I'm not going to write off anyone who attended a protest against the murder of a woman, based on an assumption about what her reasons for attending it were.
It's almost like feminists are trying to create an underclass of brainwashed idiots that they can abuse with impunity.
What you think you want is not always what you actually want. The latter is determined by biology.
Women feel unsafe. You may argue that it's without reason, but they do. So I have no problems with her attending a march protesting against a murder, regardless of rabid feminist shrews trying to hijack it to make it all about their agenda, though I do think a march against unsafety is pointless.
Don't misunderestimate yourself. I see a lot of feminists say stuff like "I hate men, but my husband is great". The funny thing is that he then turns out not to be the kind of castrated loser that they say they like.
No, they don't. That wasn't about safety, it was an opportunistic play to try and strip more rights from men. They got their misogyny law, so yet again it worked.
It's almost like feminists are trying to create an underclass of brainwashed idiots that they can abuse with impunity.
They most certainly do, even if you want to claim that this was not the reason for the protest. I've had far too many experiences with ordinary, normal women and girls fearing for their safety to agree with this.
Now, what was it "about"? That is a simplification. For any protest, there are theoretically as many motivations as there are participants. I'm not going to write off anyone who attended a protest against the murder of a woman, based on an assumption about what her reasons for attending it were.
What you think you want is not always what you actually want. The latter is determined by biology.
Imagine believing what a woman tells you. I can't go further than that, because I literally just got off a ban, but yeah...
I think your idea here is much too based on an assumption of naivety when malice fits far better.
Imagine rejecting reasonable stuff because the individual who said it happened to be a woman.
It's very difficult to co-ordinate malice.