Once, the American man was a conqueror. Now he is but a caretaker

Neither of these are true, and show the bias of the Leftist author.

First, that the American man heroic mythos is not one of a conqueror, but is of an entrepreneur and adventurer. That's a different concept. The author is trying to portray masculinity as violent and oppressive.

The idea of the modern man, heroically portrayed as a "caretaker" is also utterly false. The modern American man is not expected to care for anything, and is normally barely capable of taking care of himself. Men are assumed, by definition, to be incompetent and not entrusted with any even rudimentary amounts of competence. The modern American man is portrayed as a useless, ignorant, lazy, worthless, drunk, oaf that his wife delusionally seems to stay with, even though he contributes nothing positively to her life besides a paycheck.

But that's the American man as he is portrayed. The heroic idea of a "caretaker" is almost just as bad. A 'caretaker'... a baby sitter. Someone who watches to make sure you don't stab yourself in the eye. Not someone who solves problems. Not someone who inspires people. Not someone who uplifts people. Not someone who can be seen as a rock, or a foundation, to build a family around. Not as a defender. No, just someone who gets payed $10 /hr to make sure that you haven't tied yet. That is the "heroic" version of the American man that this retarded bigot is promoting: a man who is not even fit to be called a mother.