Been seeing it a lot lately, wondering if there are any good takedowns of the concept.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Wet streets don't cause rain.
Poverty doesn't cause crime. The same behaviors that lead to poverty also lead to crime.
Edit to add: most of the leftists pushing these insane and idiotic theories about white supremacy and patriarchy keeping everyone else down? I think the Lion's share of these people know they're lying. They just don't care. It's a game they play to secure more resources for themselves and their tribe. It doesn't have to make sense. It only needs to function in redistributing power towards their group.
I remember being in London and a team lead there told me that when you are out late and you see a bunch of blacks at night just run the other direction. The guy was born and raised in London.
While we were living in Russia I visited London/Wales. I thought London was more dangerous than Moscow by leaps. I was targeted for ambush on Oxford St and barely dodged it/ Never happened on the Tverskaya.
London, and Britain in general, has never seen a more violent period in history than right now. Progressives, such as Steven Pinker, will try to pull out a bunch of statistics that show it is the most peaceful using homicide rates, but they fail to account for modern medicine saving so many people from stabbings that would have been lethal over a century ago. At the same time, the British people have never had less access to weaponry.
Steven Pinker is a hyper partisan leftist. He will spin anything in order to protect his party.
Pinker danced like a buffoon to celebrate Biden's "win" and put out the video.
Academics like Pinker are leftist cucks and they should receive zero respect. Being a Harvard professor should be seen as a mark of corruption and shame not worthy of any positive status.
Fucking Detroit has a lower violent crime rate than London.
It’s really more like if you see 4 young people in hoodies in a bad part of town at an odd hour, you should keep your distance.
Fair enough, but I have a feeling that bad parts are segregated along racial lines. And I think London specifically has a very bad case of bad minority areas with Somali being the dominant faction.
There was an article a while back about how gangs in London not being to keep up with how violent the Somali ones were.
Hard disagree.
If it's a group of whites they might harass you and on an even lower chance might rob.
Blacks WILL harass you every single time, and the majority of incidences they will attack you unprovoked and rob you.
For anyone who has actually lived in ghetto areas you know the difference.
Also, black owned banks were even less likely to loan money to black people than white owned banks.
Funny thing people don't know is that black banks used to, and mostly still do, use "nigger-time" as a metric.
Did Jamal show up early for his appointment? Did he come the first time it was set, or did he call two hours later and ask for another day?
If you act like a nigger your loan rating tanks through the floor.
Blacks know the bullshit other blacks pull, because they do it themselves. Whites know it as well because they've all been victim to it, but aren't allowed to use that experience anymore because it's "racist."
Blacks don't care about being screwed over by other blacks. Just like they don't care about being murdered by other blacks. Anything that happens within the tribe is the business of the tribe. But any attack from outside the tribe, even if it's absolutely miniscule in comparison? Such an affront must be met with absolute hysteria.
It's really no different than heritage Americans focusing on immigrant crime... except for the part where both immigrant and black crime are insanely more common per capita than white crime, which justifies the nationalist position on these issues.