After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
Here's a test: look your mother in the eye and tell her that it's okay that you beat off to pictures of cartoon children performing sex acts because they aren't real children.
She wouldn't like his son jerking over anything unless it's a real girlfriend. Not really a good question.
If you can't look your mother in the eye and tell her you're doing something, you shouldn't be doing it.
Stupid argument cause there's a lot of things people don't tell their parents . but I've told her that I defend it and I have stated reasons why. What else do you have?
Look your mother in the eye and tell her about all the porn you have watched.
Look your mother in the eye and tell her about all the dirty thoughts you have had.
Look your mother in the eye and tell her all your darkest secret.
Do you tell your mother everything? Do you need your mother's permission for everything?
Why have fun at this point? Just be a robot and do everything she wants you to do. That means stop spending countless hours arguing with strangers on the internet instead do something productive.
You're either a disingenuous fag or shoot retarded if you can't comprehend what I said. But, in case you are shoot retarded: If you can't look your mother in the eye it means that you're ashamed of whatever it is you're doing. If you're already subconsciously ashamed of that thing you're doing, you should knock it off. Shame leads to self-loathing, which leads to depression, which leads you to arguing that drawings of children getting molested is okay on the Internet.
Here's the logic: the people who enjoy this kind of smut are the kind of people that drive around in panel vans asking little kids if they want to see something cool in the back seat. Those people are dangerous and should be tagged and monitored.
Now what tickles me pink is that everyone in this thread defending lolicon are conveniently silent when it's brought up that they are defending illustrated pornography of children. I wouldn't have an issue with this if any of you were actually honest about what it is you're defending, but none of you are. You're twisting yourselves into knots trying to get out of that admission. And it's kind of funny that you don't seem to want to talk about what kind of people are interested in viewing this material. Nor do you seem to want to talk about why anyone who isn't a complete scumbag would have an issue with not only the material, or the kind of people who want to view it. Really makes ya think.
look if you want to go around screaming about trying to force people to say they are pedo because of fictional anime characters then just say so. . Honestly lolicon has been around for decades and it wasn't an issue until recently when it suddenly became trendy to start whining and crying about it. With all the energy being wasted on loli, you'd think you could actually have helped some actual person by now.
Found the pedophile. Spill the beans, what did you get convicted for?
saddens me how KIA is degeneracy-friendly sometimes, it really clashes with the overall basedness. how do you point out globohomo and then jack it to little kids in the same hour?
Degenerates are precedent. The laws and weapons used to strike them will never stop with them.
Its amazing how people can understand instantly how that is a bad idea with guns and speech, but suddenly it offends their world view and its totes okay.
world view? it's pedophilia you sick fuck
if i only jacked it to 2d horses i'd still be into bestiality, same as you're into children moron
"oh no wait actually the horse is a human that merely looks like a horse so it's okay"
god you disgust me
No its a picture that was made without a victim. What is done with it might be pedophilia.
Nor was that the point you neatly side stepped because you don't have any argument against it. Which is that this is the soft sell, easy target that they know emotional chodes will sell out happily, to grant them the precedent and tools to oppress actual important things further.
You know, that thing they have successfully done to guns and our speech for years. But don't worry, this time it certainly is because they care so much about our children and nothing else.
Comment Reported for: Justifying censorship.
Comment Approved: I will not ideologically purify this forum.
Leave the site. You are not welcome. Not only are you pro-censorship but you're also a pedophile.
its not kids and i should rewrite the post. Didnt say i like something but I have said i defend it for the same reason cause i think its similar to the 1980s fear mongering over fiction and irrational and leftists have taken to calling everything in anime pedo so not moving an inch
i call being attracted to children pedophilia
loli is small children
loli is pedophilia
Not children and trying to act like it is by calling it pedo only cheapens the word .
I call being against lolis pedophilia.
You are a pedophile. Turn yourself in.