That's really fucking weird. Part of me thinks if it really were fake they'd never do such a bad job and it must be a combination of compression artifacts and the boom mic being really big and awkwardly placed. The other part of me thinks clown world is slowly turning me into an idiot.
How significant was this presser? Not at all. No answers were given to anything relevant. He had a mask on but it was falling off his nose. What was the point?
The point is, look how we can make the narrative.
It's right up there with the "totally legitimate" birth certificate that had embedded Photoshop layers. Look at the nearly 1000 signed affidavits under penalty of perjury that fraud was executed during the election. "Yeah, you caught us. What'cha gonna do about it?"
There has been posts of another angle, and after seeing that I'm less sure. Part of it still looks like his hand clips through a mic, but if you go through them slowly, side by side, it does show a bunch of boom mics and you can follow how they could intersect to give the effect.
Either way it still looks weird, since Biden walks right up basically sitting on the mics, but only says one thing then leaves. Something is fishy even if it isn't video manipulation.
There was another indoor shot where the top of his head was cropped as he walked past a beige wall that I thought was compression artifact, but it's interesting to consider the fact that you probably could cover up a bad video manipulation job by applying enough filtering and compression. Maybe use different types of compression so the different algorithms work against each other.
It's also interesting that in an age where everyone has high def cameras with dedicated video compression hardware and massive amounts of storage in their pockets, these videos tend to be compressed so heavily and in such low resolution. Why do these videos all look like they were taken 15 years ago?
Things that are "fake" that we would never believe they would do a bad job on:
Various journalists throughout the years "dying" after having a hot schoop on the various alphabet agencies.
Snowden and his whistle blowing.
Propaganda posing as "news".
Epstein committing "suicide".
Elections "can't be rigged". Also election was rigged 4 years ago. No proof has come to light yet, but there were some pictures on facebook and stuff. You can't see them.
Trump is an evil dictator.
People being invited into the capitol and toured around with video evidence were actually staging an insurrection.
Or it looked like it was in the foreground because it was larger than the other mics. e: In other shots you can see it is significantly bigger than the other mics.
That's really fucking weird. Part of me thinks if it really were fake they'd never do such a bad job and it must be a combination of compression artifacts and the boom mic being really big and awkwardly placed. The other part of me thinks clown world is slowly turning me into an idiot.
It's because they're making fun of us.
How significant was this presser? Not at all. No answers were given to anything relevant. He had a mask on but it was falling off his nose. What was the point?
The point is, look how we can make the narrative.
It's right up there with the "totally legitimate" birth certificate that had embedded Photoshop layers. Look at the nearly 1000 signed affidavits under penalty of perjury that fraud was executed during the election. "Yeah, you caught us. What'cha gonna do about it?"
There has been posts of another angle, and after seeing that I'm less sure. Part of it still looks like his hand clips through a mic, but if you go through them slowly, side by side, it does show a bunch of boom mics and you can follow how they could intersect to give the effect.
Either way it still looks weird, since Biden walks right up basically sitting on the mics, but only says one thing then leaves. Something is fishy even if it isn't video manipulation.
There was another indoor shot where the top of his head was cropped as he walked past a beige wall that I thought was compression artifact, but it's interesting to consider the fact that you probably could cover up a bad video manipulation job by applying enough filtering and compression. Maybe use different types of compression so the different algorithms work against each other.
It's also interesting that in an age where everyone has high def cameras with dedicated video compression hardware and massive amounts of storage in their pockets, these videos tend to be compressed so heavily and in such low resolution. Why do these videos all look like they were taken 15 years ago?
Things that are "fake" that we would never believe they would do a bad job on:
Various journalists throughout the years "dying" after having a hot schoop on the various alphabet agencies.
Snowden and his whistle blowing.
Propaganda posing as "news".
Epstein committing "suicide".
Elections "can't be rigged". Also election was rigged 4 years ago. No proof has come to light yet, but there were some pictures on facebook and stuff. You can't see them.
Trump is an evil dictator.
People being invited into the capitol and toured around with video evidence were actually staging an insurrection.
Various journalists throughout the years "dying" after having a hot schoop on the various alphabet agencies.
Dont know about these. Got one you would like to share?
Look into Michael Hastings.
Here's a summary.
Assuming they'd care. The public didn't give a shit when the 2020 election was "fortified". Like a fake president apparently.
The mic is large because it was in the foreground. How did Joe clip in front? Is he an 4th dimensional alien?
Or it looked like it was in the foreground because it was larger than the other mics. e: In other shots you can see it is significantly bigger than the other mics.