One hospital district rolled AstraZeneca out to its employees and 3 are now hospitalized due to side effects. Were talking probably more than 3 in 1000 which would kill more than the rona if the entire country was given jt
That's the vaccine you hate because it was created by women, right? Which you initially thought would be created to kill all men, but then you reconsidered, because it would only end up killing people who trust them?
No idea. Why don't you ask the creator of the vaccine, who hasn't been seen in public since the European concern.
But then clearly, that can't be about The Genocide, since the European Union is also led by a Wahmen. Maybe the 'concerns' are just a way to distract attention from what is really going on. Or maybe they are intended to convince men not to take the vaccine, because the virus kills mostly men, in order to make sure that more men are killed.
I won't lose that much if it goes wrong.
Maybe it's bad. If you're good at losing, you have a promising career at Wall Street.
The European Union actually is trying to squash the claims that the vaccine is flawed, if you're going with that angle. It's individual European countries raising their concern.
I'm glad you trust the Danish PM so much. I quite like her, she's tough on immigration.
I don't want to be a hedgie.
Too bad. You'd have rather few wahmen as colleagues.
Both it and the CCP vaccine have come under fire lately for safety reasons. Multiple countries (Austria, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Norway among others) have suspended or restricted its use. In contrast, Pfizer had Tiffany Dover and more news in January, I believe.
Probably there are cases all over, all the time, that don't come to our attention for various reasons, including potential media suppression. The WHO is still supporting them, of course:
“Yes, we should continue using the AstraZeneca vaccine,” WHO’s spokeswoman Margaret Harris said on Friday. “There is no indication to not use it.”
What does this all means? Who knows. Anecdotes themselves are statistically low in terms of medical risk, and vaccines can trigger preexisting conditions despite it being a real concern, but similarly, we don't know the long-term effects because this is obviously an emergency vaccine, rather than one that has gone through a rigorous and extended (e.g. 5+ years) trial, so we can't dismiss it as a statistical anomaly either.
I don’t trust their numbers for a second, the fact they report anything at all is concerning to me.
One hospital district rolled AstraZeneca out to its employees and 3 are now hospitalized due to side effects. Were talking probably more than 3 in 1000 which would kill more than the rona if the entire country was given jt
That's the vaccine you hate because it was created by women, right? Which you initially thought would be created to kill all men, but then you reconsidered, because it would only end up killing people who trust them?
Has The Genocide started?
Ho boy, hope your dreams of a Ferrari won't be shattered cause you saw a wahmen and figured that the vaccine was just a plan for GENOCIDE.
But then clearly, that can't be about The Genocide, since the European Union is also led by a Wahmen. Maybe the 'concerns' are just a way to distract attention from what is really going on. Or maybe they are intended to convince men not to take the vaccine, because the virus kills mostly men, in order to make sure that more men are killed.
Maybe it's bad. If you're good at losing, you have a promising career at Wall Street.
I'm glad you trust the Danish PM so much. I quite like her, she's tough on immigration.
Too bad. You'd have rather few wahmen as colleagues.
I only want the vaccine if it's guaranteed to kill me as to free me from this inescapable nightmare
Both it and the CCP vaccine have come under fire lately for safety reasons. Multiple countries (Austria, Denmark, Iceland, Italy, Norway among others) have suspended or restricted its use. In contrast, Pfizer had Tiffany Dover and more news in January, I believe.
Probably there are cases all over, all the time, that don't come to our attention for various reasons, including potential media suppression. The WHO is still supporting them, of course:
What does this all means? Who knows. Anecdotes themselves are statistically low in terms of medical risk, and vaccines can trigger preexisting conditions despite it being a real concern, but similarly, we don't know the long-term effects because this is obviously an emergency vaccine, rather than one that has gone through a rigorous and extended (e.g. 5+ years) trial, so we can't dismiss it as a statistical anomaly either.