What makes you think Dr. Money's an exception? These are not pro bono castrations, and if not sexual pleasure they're at least getting an undeserved sense of righteousness out of it.
Get over it, men are just as good as women if they try, no matter how much you insist otherwise. That includes being good at torture or political deception for profit.
I don't want to get in between you two's slap fight but crime rates and gender aren't exactly a solid data point. Women barely get even reprimanded for crimes, let alone charged, let alone the full actual charge instead of a lesser crime.
Its actually a real problem, especially in the "molesting and/or abusing kids" sector of crime.
I question how common it is that women don't even get 'charged' as a general rule. But even if true, that would actually support my point. Look at crimes such as murder, which are pretty difficult to hide. If women are barely punished for crimes (so less of a deterrent effect), and still they commit far fewer crimes, that really does show something.
And it most certainly shows that "only wahmen would do bad things, because men couldn't live with themselves" is the usual from this poor victim of the 5'1" Assassin Squad.
I'm not trying to take a side here, just point that the data you are using isn't a solid metric to simply say "this disproves you instantly."
If women are barely punished for crimes (so less of a deterrent effect), and still they commit far fewer crimes, that really does show something.
This does assume though that women and men are equal, and therefore respond to the same draws towards crime and the same deterrents out of it. Which is a very reductive idea.
Men are more than perfectly capable of crimes, I'd agree even that they commit far more. But only in the sense of defining crime as an illegal activity in the eyes of the court/law, which is also not a solid metric of defining the "badness" of the two genders either.
Really? You can't see "being male is more important than upbringing in determining criminality" as a weird version of the black = criminal idea portrayed by "race realists"?
I'm not going to say it.
I'm not surprised it's a woman performing it. A man couldn't live with themselves doing that.
Dr. Money did it, and he died at the age of 84 of Parkinson's disease. So clearly that's not true.
He did other things as well, yet it was only his prime test subject that couldn't live with it.
I was hoping it was something more unpleasant.
Dr Money is an exception because he was getting sexual pleasure and income from promoting this sick agenda.
What makes you think Dr. Money's an exception? These are not pro bono castrations, and if not sexual pleasure they're at least getting an undeserved sense of righteousness out of it.
Magnus Hirschfeld, Harold Gillies, Ludwig Levy-Lenz, Erwin Gohrbandt...
Get over it, men are just as good as women if they try, no matter how much you insist otherwise. That includes being good at torture or political deception for profit.
Ever looked at the crime rates, champ?
I don't want to get in between you two's slap fight but crime rates and gender aren't exactly a solid data point. Women barely get even reprimanded for crimes, let alone charged, let alone the full actual charge instead of a lesser crime.
Its actually a real problem, especially in the "molesting and/or abusing kids" sector of crime.
I question how common it is that women don't even get 'charged' as a general rule. But even if true, that would actually support my point. Look at crimes such as murder, which are pretty difficult to hide. If women are barely punished for crimes (so less of a deterrent effect), and still they commit far fewer crimes, that really does show something.
And it most certainly shows that "only wahmen would do bad things, because men couldn't live with themselves" is the usual from this poor victim of the 5'1" Assassin Squad.
I'm not trying to take a side here, just point that the data you are using isn't a solid metric to simply say "this disproves you instantly."
This does assume though that women and men are equal, and therefore respond to the same draws towards crime and the same deterrents out of it. Which is a very reductive idea.
Men are more than perfectly capable of crimes, I'd agree even that they commit far more. But only in the sense of defining crime as an illegal activity in the eyes of the court/law, which is also not a solid metric of defining the "badness" of the two genders either.
Correct. But the point was not that "men are bad", only that it's stupid to think that "men can't be bad", like this guy believes.
Being mothers. Quite important. None of the great scientists were the product of parthenogenesis.
Almost as if both men and women have pros and cons.
Not this again.
The idea that we can just ignore that most criminals are raised solely by women is pseudoscience straight out of the "race realism" playbook
You're getting more incoherent by the minute. I think this past month has broken you.
Really? You can't see "being male is more important than upbringing in determining criminality" as a weird version of the black = criminal idea portrayed by "race realists"?
Crime rates are "racist".
Only my one true fictional anecdote tells me the real picture.