When the Cherokee made contact with the British, the first thing they did was offer slaves in exchange for guns, and many took up arms for the Confederacy explicity in the name of slavery. Is Tariq going to denounce the injuns? What about the African kingdoms who enslaved other blacks to sell to Europeans? Mauritania? Libya?
Wait 'till Tariq Nasheed finds out about the black slave-owners...
It's axiomatic that black on Asian violence is justified under intersectionalist ideology. Just like his cultural appropriation of Arabic names is justified because black supremacy.
So I guess he is the next generation of race hustling. Cracks me up to see younger black people born after civil rights movement speak as if they are suffering more than anyone in world history.
Most Asians in north america were slaves long after the blacks were freed, look up the tale of the railway chinese workers. So if anyone is justified in racial violence, it would be the reverse, but NO ONE is justified to use violence because some asshoe twenty generations back was a prick. That mitigating measure in mind, it is entirely possible a random pair of Asian people in that timeframe owned slaves, and that they were not good owners. After all, statisically speaking, more blacks in the south owned slaves than whites, per-capita, so slavery stats can be fascinating to look into as to how it all happened, from the comfort of centuries between us. Anti-black racism is also very common in the modern era in many Asian cultures, they are notoriously xenophobic after all, they don't even like other Asian cultures, let alone whites who share their ideology, and it just gets worse as it goes down the dissimilarity chain until you hit the literal concentration camps China is currently using today on some of their population.
TLDR; it's probably true, the core fact situation at least. The context around it is likely questionable.
It just sounds like this Siamese guy was created to be the strawman rso acist fucktards like Tariq could beat against to push his far left bullshit. And like you said, once again with that far left "sins of the father" bullshit as well.
Two Asian dudes owned some slaves a billion years ago so beating up Asians is justified lul
Like there were no black slave owners in the world
The first slave owner in America was black.
And just like that we are victim blaming again
In their ideology, the blacks murdering Asians are the victims.
Leftists: "Asians are white-adjacent so they have it coming to them."
When the Cherokee made contact with the British, the first thing they did was offer slaves in exchange for guns, and many took up arms for the Confederacy explicity in the name of slavery. Is Tariq going to denounce the injuns? What about the African kingdoms who enslaved other blacks to sell to Europeans? Mauritania? Libya?
Wait 'till Tariq Nasheed finds out about the black slave-owners...
It's axiomatic that black on Asian violence is justified under intersectionalist ideology. Just like his cultural appropriation of Arabic names is justified because black supremacy.
So I guess he is the next generation of race hustling. Cracks me up to see younger black people born after civil rights movement speak as if they are suffering more than anyone in world history.
Mess with a Filipino-American and you'll be met with a machete and a sumpak. These leftists don't want to mess with them.
So is this true or is he talking shit?
Most Asians in north america were slaves long after the blacks were freed, look up the tale of the railway chinese workers. So if anyone is justified in racial violence, it would be the reverse, but NO ONE is justified to use violence because some asshoe twenty generations back was a prick. That mitigating measure in mind, it is entirely possible a random pair of Asian people in that timeframe owned slaves, and that they were not good owners. After all, statisically speaking, more blacks in the south owned slaves than whites, per-capita, so slavery stats can be fascinating to look into as to how it all happened, from the comfort of centuries between us. Anti-black racism is also very common in the modern era in many Asian cultures, they are notoriously xenophobic after all, they don't even like other Asian cultures, let alone whites who share their ideology, and it just gets worse as it goes down the dissimilarity chain until you hit the literal concentration camps China is currently using today on some of their population.
TLDR; it's probably true, the core fact situation at least. The context around it is likely questionable.
It just sounds like this Siamese guy was created to be the strawman rso acist fucktards like Tariq could beat against to push his far left bullshit. And like you said, once again with that far left "sins of the father" bullshit as well.