Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

27
We Wuz Chanese Kings and Khans and Sheeit (threadreaderapp.com)
posted 5 years ago by somercet 5 years ago by somercet +27 / -0
13 comments share
13 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (13)
sorted by:
▲ 18 ▼
– deleted 18 points 5 years ago +18 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– Soup_Navy_Admiral 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

I for one welcome our Ebola-29 overlords.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– reidj 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

That's not what the article claims. They claim that the Shang dynasty was made up of Aryans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– somercet [S] 13 points 5 years ago +13 / -0

A long tweet storm about Indo-European charioteers and Early, Early China:

tl;dr - There's either two theories to subscribe to regarding Chinese civilization. Either:

a) it was the only Bronze Age civilization to develop COMPLETELY INDEPENDENTLY from the rest of the world, with all similarities being through coincidence or convoluted transmission.

b) like literally every other major civilization around it, it was founded by a similar stock of Indo-European steppe people that invaded India to its South and Central Asia to its West.

Occam's Razor.

Cry more.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– WorldsBestestFluffer 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0

The title of your thread implies a ridiculous claim that black people are responsible for China's historical successes, yet the actual tweets are about archeological evidence pointing to Indo-Europeans conquering ancient China.

Am I missing something here?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 5 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– WorldsBestestFluffer 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

no one is allowed to see them.

Ah yes, the age old response to "show me the receipts"

What I find most interesting about this person's tweets is that xir is a declared anti-racist and anti-fascist. Would I be wrong in assuming we have another woke loser that is a white supremacist with a guilty conscience?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– somercet [S] 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Given this retweet:

https://twitter.com/KetaMeanGirl/status/1356311615520468994

I would suspect a right-wing troll in academia (rare), or a leftie with a sense of humor (rarer than hen's teeth).

It is interesting that the poster seemed intent on taking down Han supremacists who insist that China made all her culture herself, which could be an anti-racist who is actually able to see racism outside of white people. (Unobtanium rare.)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– HeckOffSteppersReeee 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

They all are

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– somercet [S] 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

You are. Instead of a black person saying "we wuz kangs," I put those words into the mouth of a white (i.e., Indo-European) person purely for the humor of it. I'm not sure how you would find this confusing, unless you read my post with an unbreakable expectation that any post here could only be mocking blacks (or Hoteps).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– WorldsBestestFluffer 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Generally "we wuz Kangs" is used to mock black people claiming to be responsible for all advanced cultures, despite that no advanced cultures were ever built by a culture run by an ethnic majority of sub-Saharan Africans.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Arkana 4 points 5 years ago +4 / -0

Basically anywhere that had chariots there was an aryan/indo-european nobility. I would also suggest reading this article which goes over the same topic.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Cough 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

Didn't they interbreed with Denisovans while Europeans breeded with Neanderthals hence different races?

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy