We Wuz Chanese Kings and Khans and Sheeit
(threadreaderapp.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
The title of your thread implies a ridiculous claim that black people are responsible for China's historical successes, yet the actual tweets are about archeological evidence pointing to Indo-Europeans conquering ancient China.
Am I missing something here?
Ah yes, the age old response to "show me the receipts"
What I find most interesting about this person's tweets is that xir is a declared anti-racist and anti-fascist. Would I be wrong in assuming we have another woke loser that is a white supremacist with a guilty conscience?
Given this retweet:
https://twitter.com/KetaMeanGirl/status/1356311615520468994
I would suspect a right-wing troll in academia (rare), or a leftie with a sense of humor (rarer than hen's teeth).
It is interesting that the poster seemed intent on taking down Han supremacists who insist that China made all her culture herself, which could be an anti-racist who is actually able to see racism outside of white people. (Unobtanium rare.)
They all are
You are. Instead of a black person saying "we wuz kangs," I put those words into the mouth of a white (i.e., Indo-European) person purely for the humor of it. I'm not sure how you would find this confusing, unless you read my post with an unbreakable expectation that any post here could only be mocking blacks (or Hoteps).
Generally "we wuz Kangs" is used to mock black people claiming to be responsible for all advanced cultures, despite that no advanced cultures were ever built by a culture run by an ethnic majority of sub-Saharan Africans.