I decided to do what the supposed news will not do, look at the history of the individuals making accusations. It turns out that Boylan has quite a history. She is a rabid feminist, she hates white men - but more to the point, she was effusively praising Governor Cuomo at the time when she now claims she was sexually harassed.
Now I know some people are going to say "me no like Cuomo". You don't have to. That doesn't mean that lies are not lies. Cuomo killed the elderly and he did not commit sexual harassment, at least against this woman.
All she does is accuse him of verbally harassing her anyway, and it could very well be completely accurate. Let them eat their own, and hold him accountable to the standards he passed.
It doesn't matter whether they are lies or not because it never mattered before. They should damn well live by their own rules.
Appealing to common sense doesn't work. They have to suffer the same shit they gleefully inflicted on others. Let them die by their own sword until they realize they're not immune to the demons that they've called.
I don't know if just pointing to a date and one word in a tweet necessarily debunks the whole thing. That's not my opinion on Cuomo talking, merely the fact that we know next to nothing based on these tweets.
My bad on the misread I'll take full credit for that. Having gone over it properly this time I might hazard that public facing social media accounts in the political sphere are usually more of a PR exercise than a social media one.
I'm not saying either way on this matter, merely that it's a trap to assume that anything out there in the world can be diluted into a fact before all the details emerge.
Eh, people are going to believe what they want to believe. If you can't trust what this woman wrote about Cuomo in 2018, why would that not apply equally to what she is saying now?
I am pretty sure that she is doing this for attention. And look how much she got it, both from the MeToo crowd and from conservatives who have a hateboner for Cuomo so they will believe anything bad about him.
I'm not saying trust either. I'm all for waiting for more information to come out before delcaring it true or false based on a he said, she said situation.
I never thought that was a good mantra, mostly because I am one and know what we are capable of. I don't know if he harassed anyone or not, but I'm not going to be on here arguing for his innocence.
I decided to do what the supposed news will not do, look at the history of the individuals making accusations. It turns out that Boylan has quite a history. She is a rabid feminist, she hates white men - but more to the point, she was effusively praising Governor Cuomo at the time when she now claims she was sexually harassed.
Now I know some people are going to say "me no like Cuomo". You don't have to. That doesn't mean that lies are not lies. Cuomo killed the elderly and he did not commit sexual harassment, at least against this woman.
I mean... If you can weaponize SJWs against people who deserve it, at least they have a use, right?
I can hardly think of a person MORE deserving of it than the mass murderer, Andrew Cuomo, hopefully someone can rope in Fredo too.
All she does is accuse him of verbally harassing her anyway, and it could very well be completely accurate. Let them eat their own, and hold him accountable to the standards he passed.
In minecraft
It doesn't matter whether they are lies or not because it never mattered before. They should damn well live by their own rules.
Appealing to common sense doesn't work. They have to suffer the same shit they gleefully inflicted on others. Let them die by their own sword until they realize they're not immune to the demons that they've called.
Oh, look, a crab just got too high in the bucket.
I'm all for them tearing each other apart, but this is going to go the way of the Tara Reade allegations
I don't know if just pointing to a date and one word in a tweet necessarily debunks the whole thing. That's not my opinion on Cuomo talking, merely the fact that we know next to nothing based on these tweets.
What 'one word'?
My bad on the misread I'll take full credit for that. Having gone over it properly this time I might hazard that public facing social media accounts in the political sphere are usually more of a PR exercise than a social media one.
I'm not saying either way on this matter, merely that it's a trap to assume that anything out there in the world can be diluted into a fact before all the details emerge.
Eh, people are going to believe what they want to believe. If you can't trust what this woman wrote about Cuomo in 2018, why would that not apply equally to what she is saying now?
I am pretty sure that she is doing this for attention. And look how much she got it, both from the MeToo crowd and from conservatives who have a hateboner for Cuomo so they will believe anything bad about him.
I'm not saying trust either. I'm all for waiting for more information to come out before delcaring it true or false based on a he said, she said situation.
Is she being sarcastic or serious? I can't tell.
Cuomo's shitty enough that we could spend all our time spitting on him for shit he's actually done, we don't need to make up fake rapes for him.
believe all women
I never thought that was a good mantra, mostly because I am one and know what we are capable of. I don't know if he harassed anyone or not, but I'm not going to be on here arguing for his innocence.