Please don't try to rub off your nutjobbery on people opposed to feminism.
If you are fine with trying to blackmail a girl for more nude pictures by threatening to release a nude picture, then that's on you, but it's neither fake nor a 'feminist crime'.
I guess you took a pause from calling for a bloody civil war to heroically attack 13-year-old girls, with the same language SJWs use.
It's interesting that people hide behind the word 'consequences' when they don't want to spell out what they mean, in this case that you think posting child pornography is justified because you judge someone you don't know to be a 'whore'.
Fact is, you were backtracking, cause you realized you were justifying the posting of child pornography, and that you declared a 13-year-old girl to be a "whore". Quite despicable, but that's what I've come to expect from you.
And that's going to start a civil war? You're afraid of your own shadow.
It's as real as Joe Biden's ballots, or the supporters at his "victory" speech.
Alright, now demonstrate that it is 'fake' rather than just asserting it.
Except for, you know, all the feminist organizations that backed it being a law.
I'm sure they back rape against actual rape as well. Oh my god! Rape is a 'feminist crime'.
I'm sure their motives for that aren't evil
Go right ahead and tell me how revenge porn is actually a good thing.
What stops them uploading it themselves and blaming you?
Standards of proof. Can you cite one example of that actually happening?
Your mind is as broken as any feminist's. I guess being 'anti-bad thing' can be bad if you're totally nuts. (I'll give you credit for at least attacking the correct group instead of 'women' in general.)
Demonstrate what is fake? The Jeeps at his victory speech were not owned by anyone. They were dealership cars.
You catch on quick. I meant, of course, your assertion that revenge porn is 'fake'.
Except the vast majority of people agree that rape is a crime and did so even before that cult appeared.
And the vast majority of people also agree that it should be a crime to spread nude pictures of people without their permission, and would have if there was such a thing before the cult.
Why is an extra law needed that only protects women, enforced by feminists?
Explain how the law only protects women, and that it is 'enforced' by feminist nutjobs. As far as I can see, everyone is protected, not just women - and enforcement is done by the usual state organs.
Well, the numerous false accusations by women using every other law that favors them kind of proves this point beyond doubt.
So you have no evidence whatsoever that there is a danger of someone falsely uploading it and then successfully blaming you, you just assumed it because... "uterus people bad"?
My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time
So you don't have evidence, other than your assumptions?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove.
Cause it does not necessarily fall under blackmail law, for one. If some pathetic loser is angry at his girlfriend for breaking up with him and puts her pictures online, that is not blackmail if he did not threaten her first.
Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
Why would you need text messages if there is no evidence at all that you put something online?
Why go with Revenge Porn and not the "domestic violence" and "charged with threatening to shoot up a school"?
I feel like on the scale that's the lowest crime here, and that's not even getting into the implied voter fraud being discussed there.
As usual: the most virtue signalling progressives are the worst people in real life.
Isn't threatening to shoot up schools normal for kids today?
Despite what they tell you, no.
The cool thing in 2020 is threatening sickness and getting the whole school shut down for Corona.
Please don't try to rub off your nutjobbery on people opposed to feminism.
If you are fine with trying to blackmail a girl for more nude pictures by threatening to release a nude picture, then that's on you, but it's neither fake nor a 'feminist crime'.
And guess what, he was mad because he did not receive more nudes.
I never said that blackmail is required. I pointed out that this definitely does fall under the definition that you yourself provided.
Being a whore should have consequences.
I guess you took a pause from calling for a bloody civil war to heroically attack 13-year-old girls, with the same language SJWs use.
It's interesting that people hide behind the word 'consequences' when they don't want to spell out what they mean, in this case that you think posting child pornography is justified because you judge someone you don't know to be a 'whore'.
Don't take or send nudes. It's pretty easy to avoid this problem.
You said that it should have 'consequences'. Backtracking, eh?
You really think you've cleverly outwitted me. God you're dense.
Outwitting the witless is no accomplishment.
Fact is, you were backtracking, cause you realized you were justifying the posting of child pornography, and that you declared a 13-year-old girl to be a "whore". Quite despicable, but that's what I've come to expect from you.
And that's going to start a civil war? You're afraid of your own shadow.
Alright, now demonstrate that it is 'fake' rather than just asserting it.
I'm sure they back rape against actual rape as well. Oh my god! Rape is a 'feminist crime'.
Go right ahead and tell me how revenge porn is actually a good thing.
Standards of proof. Can you cite one example of that actually happening?
Your mind is as broken as any feminist's. I guess being 'anti-bad thing' can be bad if you're totally nuts. (I'll give you credit for at least attacking the correct group instead of 'women' in general.)
You catch on quick. I meant, of course, your assertion that revenge porn is 'fake'.
And the vast majority of people also agree that it should be a crime to spread nude pictures of people without their permission, and would have if there was such a thing before the cult.
Explain how the law only protects women, and that it is 'enforced' by feminist nutjobs. As far as I can see, everyone is protected, not just women - and enforcement is done by the usual state organs.
So you have no evidence whatsoever that there is a danger of someone falsely uploading it and then successfully blaming you, you just assumed it because... "uterus people bad"?
So you don't have evidence, other than your assumptions?
Cause it does not necessarily fall under blackmail law, for one. If some pathetic loser is angry at his girlfriend for breaking up with him and puts her pictures online, that is not blackmail if he did not threaten her first.
Why would you need text messages if there is no evidence at all that you put something online?