Demonstrate what is fake? The Jeeps at his victory speech were not owned by anyone. They were dealership cars.
You catch on quick. I meant, of course, your assertion that revenge porn is 'fake'.
Except the vast majority of people agree that rape is a crime and did so even before that cult appeared.
And the vast majority of people also agree that it should be a crime to spread nude pictures of people without their permission, and would have if there was such a thing before the cult.
Why is an extra law needed that only protects women, enforced by feminists?
Explain how the law only protects women, and that it is 'enforced' by feminist nutjobs. As far as I can see, everyone is protected, not just women - and enforcement is done by the usual state organs.
Well, the numerous false accusations by women using every other law that favors them kind of proves this point beyond doubt.
So you have no evidence whatsoever that there is a danger of someone falsely uploading it and then successfully blaming you, you just assumed it because... "uterus people bad"?
My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time and I always end up on the correct side, so why would that change here?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove. Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time
So you don't have evidence, other than your assumptions?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove.
Cause it does not necessarily fall under blackmail law, for one. If some pathetic loser is angry at his girlfriend for breaking up with him and puts her pictures online, that is not blackmail if he did not threaten her first.
Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
Why would you need text messages if there is no evidence at all that you put something online?
You catch on quick. I meant, of course, your assertion that revenge porn is 'fake'.
And the vast majority of people also agree that it should be a crime to spread nude pictures of people without their permission, and would have if there was such a thing before the cult.
Explain how the law only protects women, and that it is 'enforced' by feminist nutjobs. As far as I can see, everyone is protected, not just women - and enforcement is done by the usual state organs.
So you have no evidence whatsoever that there is a danger of someone falsely uploading it and then successfully blaming you, you just assumed it because... "uterus people bad"?
My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time and I always end up on the correct side, so why would that change here?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove. Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
So you don't have evidence, other than your assumptions?
Cause it does not necessarily fall under blackmail law, for one. If some pathetic loser is angry at his girlfriend for breaking up with him and puts her pictures online, that is not blackmail if he did not threaten her first.
Why would you need text messages if there is no evidence at all that you put something online?