My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time and I always end up on the correct side, so why would that change here?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove. Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time
So you don't have evidence, other than your assumptions?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove.
Cause it does not necessarily fall under blackmail law, for one. If some pathetic loser is angry at his girlfriend for breaking up with him and puts her pictures online, that is not blackmail if he did not threaten her first.
Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
Why would you need text messages if there is no evidence at all that you put something online?
My evidence that it's fake just comes from the supporters. I bet against them every time and I always end up on the correct side, so why would that change here?
But how is that not covered by blackmail law, exactly? They made it separate so that they had less to prove. Besides, as they said in the UK, text messages are worthless in a criminal trial. (because they were too useful at stopping false accusations)
So you don't have evidence, other than your assumptions?
Cause it does not necessarily fall under blackmail law, for one. If some pathetic loser is angry at his girlfriend for breaking up with him and puts her pictures online, that is not blackmail if he did not threaten her first.
Why would you need text messages if there is no evidence at all that you put something online?