Are you really that fucking crazy? It was a different Sikorski, Jesus Christ what the fuck.
"people who worship killers of Poles"? Are you completely mad? Like, absolutely fucking loco?
Yeah, you did mean this with (((foreign))) after all lmao
Can you imagine Sikorski's 1990s precedessor as foreign minister Geremek was himself a (((non-Catholic)))?
You're a "psychotic neocon warmonger" who apparently wanted the world to go over Poland just after the previous war (and the worst war, where we also did horrible things) ended, I read her GULAG book and it's great.
I didn't even read what you (that's singular you) copy pasted to me, because I know exactly what happened and also don't even have any idea what you want to prove to me, you're acting so fucking weird just to shield the people who lied to you from nothing because I'm not going to do anything with their lying asses.
And I still don't care about your stupid attempts of distraction from answering the question who's that lying to you so.
It's also funny how you think I would or should be ~upset~ that Sikorski married a (((foreign))) woman. Even like half of our kings and/or their queens were foreign and this was by choice (even elections) and not some sort of conquest or pressure, and it's not just the Lithuanian dynasty. Your probably own favourite Bathory was closely related to Elizabeth the lesbo vampire witch (hot), and his widow organized the election of a Swede. Another Elizabeth from Bosnia even further down south was an early Polish Queen, and she was married to a Hungarian.
No, but you're upset when the Western allies are kicking Moscow in the balls for all the massacres.
Stay upset.
Yeah, "they're criminals of the highest order", but not the Moscowites, who are criminals of some lower order even when they're the ones actually murdering people and lying about it (while you believe them). Fuck off, man. Just, fuck off.
During the war, not even our gov in London was making a noise about too much because such were the hard realities (this is also why we didn't declare war in 1939 or later, we had to play with the cards we had). And as always, you refuse to give any (evil) agency to MOSCOW for actually fucking killing people and then blaming the others, and lying and lying and lying about it. (You know that not a few in Russia still lie about it right? Besides those who celebrate it.)
The undertaking of the Katyn case in Great Britain in the 1970s resulted in the most widespread Soviet and Polish action in defense of the Katyn lie since the times of the 1951 Madden Committee. On 15 April 1971, the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, after the approval or consultation of Leonid Brezhnev, Alexei Kosygin, Mikhail Suslov, Yuri Andropov, Andrei Gromyka and Boris Ponomarov, decided to take action to block publicizing the truth about Katyn in Great Britain. A "démarche to the Ministry of England" was sent to the British government, defending the version about Polish officers formulated in 1943-1944[lxx]. In the following years, the initiative of erecting a monument to the victims of Katyn in London caused a strong contraction on the part of Moscow and Warsaw, aimed at defending the lie about the alleged German responsibility for Katyn[lxxi].
Why can't tell me even your sources that you believe AND repeat as they lie to you? I don't get it. You shield the people who lie to you. That's pathetic.
Igor might have sneaked out to the war and having Punished Strelkov adventures again.
I can't find this cartoon for shit now, someone post it you have it (I don't think it was by PatriArchie Comics).
See you stupid literal faggot, there was never any "Little Russia" and I already showed you fucking Putin himself backpedaling on the issue entirely but you just must be more papist than the pope.
What "countries that covered up the Katyn Massacre", the Warsaw Pact prison is gone and all my homies hate Lubyanka.
Which will be burned and demolished because it doesn't deserve to even be a museum.
Now just tell me who's dispensing the lies to you and I'll leave you alone.
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
Well, they also attacked thermal power plants and electricity relay stations and such. (Not for the first time, and got hit back the same way just today.)
The original Russian announcement was that "no one was injured".
Just like when their airbase exploded.
More than 3% (a lot more) was just the number of those who fought.
https://observer.com/2017/07/soldiers-militia-american-revolution/
Historian John Ferling finds that the Continental Army size was actually 100,000, not counting the militia. “Probably twice that number soldiered as militiamen, for the most part defending the home front, functioning as a police force, and occasionally engaging in enemy surveillance” in addition to supplementing the Continental Army for stretches.
John K. Robertson looks at this very issue of militia size in the Journal of the American Revolution in 2016. In his article “Decoding Connecticut Militia 1739-1783,” Robertson finds that in May of 1774, the Connecticut state legislature created the 17th and 18th Regiments. At the time, the state’s population was 191,392 white males, females and children (no word on the non-white population was listed). Of these, 26,260 were in the militia, which meant 13 percent of the population.
And that estimate is very likely much too low for how many Connecticut militia there were, for several reasons. First of all, lacking a border with the Indian population, the age requirement for Connecticut in 1774 was much lower than other states (the maximum age fell from 60 to 45). Second, during the American Revolution, that maximum age of service rose to 55 in Connecticut. Third, the state expanded their regiments from 18 to 28, which would provide an estimated 14,588 men (estimated by dividing the 1774 regiment size by 18 regiments, multiplying that number by 10 for the new regiments), giving us 40,849 militiamen. Multiply that number by 13 states, and you get 531,035 militiamen (Connecticut was a middle-sized state in the 1790 Census). It could be a bit lower, but that figure a lot closer to Robert Allison’s numbers, which are 375,000 serving, or almost 15 percent of the population.
That doesn’t include the U.S. Navy, state navies, Continental Marines (2,000 by one estimate) and the estimated 55,000 who served on American Privateers, which gets us from 15 percent to perhaps as high as 25 percent participation. That number also doesn’t count the men and women who worked to feed our troops, clothe our troops, provide supplies, gather information, and protect our frontier and shores.
Just look at him in his fucking need glasses, he needs to be thrown into prison general pop and neck himself.
And all of the American military activities in Poland are financed from the 17 billion budget too.
Also the EU pulled 17 billion Euro specifically for the refugees, military assistance aside.
Do you actually think they do "hundreds or billions" worth things there secretly?
Americans military trainers of and liaisons to the Ukrainians operate openly in Poland. (They're being joined by British, Canadians, French, and so on.)
No need for anyone enlisting, Ukrainian forces don't need men but only more Western training. For example a contingent of 10,000 have just finished their UK training yesterday, but it could go on so much faster rate.
It's so strange how no one of those so concerned about the prospect nuclear war won't go protest the Russian embassy against their nuclear threats.
Nothing to forget when it's only in your mind, and South Vietnam was always losing (ridicalous battles of even the "elite" forces like the VN Rangers with American air support being massacred in their hundreds by the outnumbered and of course outgunned VC). It's pretty hard to find an early battle that wasn't a VC victory. There was never any period during 1961-65 (the "pre-Marines" American involvement) when Saigon was winning, reversing the ever increasing communist gains. "Even" the Strategic Hamlet Program was hugely counterproductive, and so was the 1963 coup.
South Vietnamese started getting their shit together only later, with one of their greatest moments ironically during the final collapse (and while left all alone):
The last major battle of the Vietnam War was fought at Xuan Loc, only 37 miles east by northeast of Saigon. In April 1975 the town was the eastern anchor of South Vietnam’s final line of defense against the North Vietnamese rush to the capital. That line ran west through Bien Hoa, just north of Saigon, to Tay Ninh, near the Cambodian border. Once it broke, Saigon was doomed—and with it the Republic of Vietnam itself. When the North Vietnamese Army attacked Xuan Loc (pronounced Swan Lock) on April 9, the communists and almost everyone else expected the Army of the Republic of Vietnam’s 18th Division to collapse like a house of cards, as had so many other ARVN units during the NVA’s massive Spring Offensive of 1975. But ARVN forces under Brig. Gen. Le Minh Dao fought fiercely in a last-ditch effort to save their country. By the time Xuan Loc did fall 12 days later, most of the world was amazed at how well the ARVN had fought, and the NVA had paid a far steeper price than it expected. Indeed, the valiant stand at Xuan Loc by heavily outnumbered ARVN soldiers echoes the famed sacrifice of King Leonidas’ 300 Spartans facing Xerxes’ Persian masses at the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 B.C. Greece. The Persians then marched south and captured Athens.
The sattelites have been up in the space already, the air recon (https://youtube.com/watch?v=zt5j2mrXLks) is just few planes flying in turns.
And, to be honest, the most important issue was this: https://youtube.com/watch?v=i9i47sgi-V4
The reason was we needed to win the war. The Germans were exterminating us.
Sikorski did go to fight the Soviets (and the Cubans in Angola) and was hidden microphone recorded as saying the Obama era Americans are treating as like negros (his words) and we shouldn't be servatile.