I normally like Tracey but calling the Kerch bridge attack a "terror bombing" is retarded. Trolling the Regime is fine but don't do it as the expense of your own credibility.
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
Are you offended that I thought the SBU was hit? Or do you think it's some sort of great gotcha? If it wasn't hit, it underlines my point even more - how on earth they're not even hitting the SBU 9 months in.
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
No doubt anything is going to be "bad shit" to someone who believes anything that's anti-Russian. I follow a lot of accounts but also take them with a grain of salt, same as the corrupt Western media. You should do the same and familiarize yourself with that grand old concept of the "fog of war".
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.
I normally like Tracey but calling the Kerch bridge attack a "terror bombing" is retarded. Trolling the Regime is fine but don't do it as the expense of your own credibility.
'Terror bombing' would be bombing to instill fear in the population.
This was more of a terrorist bombing. At the very least, they used the same tactics as ISIS.
So, since you still talk about it, will you answerto me and tell me whose lies did you so readily believe about "the SBU office hit" that you decided to publicly repeat without any sort of evidence whatsoever?
I'm not even tell you to stop believe the liars, it's your choice to be stupid, I just need to know the source of your stuff. (It's a bad shit.)
Are you offended that I thought the SBU was hit? Or do you think it's some sort of great gotcha? If it wasn't hit, it underlines my point even more - how on earth they're not even hitting the SBU 9 months in.
No doubt anything is going to be "bad shit" to someone who believes anything that's anti-Russian. I follow a lot of accounts but also take them with a grain of salt, same as the corrupt Western media. You should do the same and familiarize yourself with that grand old concept of the "fog of war".
I'm offended by your guilible naive stupidty where you continue to ever believe the lies by liars just because they tell you things. I don't know why, but you be you.
Answer to you question: They're using Soviet missiles. (And cheap Iranian "martyr" drones, that have extreme range and good bang for the price but use the same guidance system as the V2 rocket.)
Just tell me who lied to you. I won't hurt them, I promise.