11
SupremeReader 11 points ago +11 / -0

You looked the other way with Marion Zimmer Bradley but this, this was unforgivable to you

I like Mists of Avalon :(

0
SupremeReader 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, only American intel planes locate the Russian generals for them to be killed with the American supplied weapons, and then America brags about it. Not a war at all. Also just a special military operation.

After all the war to end all wars has ended over 100 years ago.

3
SupremeReader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually I don't care. I really don't.

But I saw was this video today which may be or may be not relevant:

0
SupremeReader 0 points ago +1 / -1

Alright, so again, just why won't Russia make their own video hosting service for the drunken rants of the spokeswoman Zakhrova or the frontline dispatches of the Z-emblem marked Aleksander Kots repeatedly revealing Russia's own positions to be destroyed the next day?

Answer this, it's not like their internet personnel and infrastructure are being literally hunted and destroyed like that of the Islamic State.

1
SupremeReader 1 point ago +2 / -1

So are you a Russian or an Ukrainian, because no.one else is directly involved, not even Belarus.

0
SupremeReader 0 points ago +1 / -1

The original Soviets used their own publishing houses and the Soviet-sponsored American Communist Party (distribution) for their propaganda materials in America. They didn't even think the American publishers have an obligation to print it for them on their own money. Because it's this bizarre.

-1
SupremeReader -1 points ago +0 / -1

Why won't Russians make a RuTube to host their (neo-Soviet) propaganda at their own servers?

Is there really some kind of moral obligation for an American company to invest their own money in spreading the propaganda of hostile countries?

I just don't understand your (weird) position.

1
SupremeReader 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh, your "draft!" fantasies again. Unless you mean "a generation" of Russians, but even Russia might do away with the 30 years age limit for foreign nationals you're probably more concerned about:

According to current legislation, only Russians aged 18 to 40 and foreigners aged 18 to 30 are permitted to enroll as professional soldiers in the military.

The amendment, introduced by the head of the Duma's Defense Committee, Andrei Kartapolov, and his deputy, Andrei Krasov, does not mention any new upper age limit.

The amendment would also make it easier for Russia's armed forces to recruit civilian medics, engineers, and operations and communications specialists.

All generations, and old men, not any "generation of young men". Like in Ukraine, also with the other Russians forces (seps, militias and mercs, police units) and officer corps.

In any case, the generations of foreign young men, and foreign middle aged men, and foreign old men would have to make efforts of their own to become involved in such a "draft".

1
SupremeReader 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course, it's always been like that.

You don't want to give "freedom of speech" to entities like the enemy nation's ministries in your country, this is absurd.

-4
SupremeReader -4 points ago +2 / -6

We are.

Also the GWOT never actually ended. Even if it mostly moved to Africa, especially since losing in the original Afghanistan theater.

The original Cold War also continues in Korea, just the ceasefire holds (not to be confused with peace). That's for you in "we" because Poland isn't involved (but we've been on the other side), at least yet.

-12
SupremeReader -12 points ago +2 / -14

What blindly? It's literal propaganda, by the very definition of this word. Go and consult any dictionary.

More exactly, it's war propaganda.

-13
SupremeReader -13 points ago +2 / -15

We already talk about Russia here, don't we? Distributing enemy propaganda, or just expressing anti-war or anti-military sentiment, is a criminal offense in Russia (and that's not new, beginning with the Russian crime of "extremism" for publishing interviews with Chechen separatist leaders and such already decades ago), and actually it's normal in wars.

Now why should we tolerate Russian propaganda in our countries? Because it's not normal in wars. That Soviet and pro-Soviet propaganda was allowed in America during the Cold War was weird. But during the recent (and ongoing, now mostly in Africa) war against the Islamic State the enemy propaganda has been suppressed very strongly on the internet with no free speech excuse.

-8
SupremeReader -8 points ago +2 / -10

There are no such videos about "murdering civilians".

I suppose Buryat Lives Matter alright. An easy solution to that is for them to stay safe home in Asia and be Mongols there, far away from the old Georgian volunteers with their scores to settle for Sukhumi 1993.

-1
SupremeReader -1 points ago +2 / -3

Most of post-Soviet countries aren't Slavic. The only ones are Russia (mostly, but this is changing), Ukraine, Belarus.

2
SupremeReader 2 points ago +2 / -0

AC-130? Is it like this mislabeled (and with pilot chatter redubbed) Apache video that Putin personally showed to Oliver Stone, but a video game?

Stone still being a stupid boomer even after shown the truth: https://observers.france24.com/en/20170622-oliver-stone-responds-putin-fake-video-claims

3
SupremeReader 3 points ago +3 / -0

10 more black lives

The very first thing he did after exiting the car was BOOM HEADSHOT an obviously white woman, after which the feed was cut.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›