You're saying that YouTube, an entity known to lie constantly about anyone going against the leftist narrative, should now be believed because you don't like who they're talking about this time?
The original Soviets used their own publishing houses and the Soviet-sponsored American Communist Party (distribution) for their propaganda materials in America. They didn't even think the American publishers have an obligation to print it for them on their own money. Because it's this bizarre.
Alright, so again, just why won't Russia make their own video hosting service for the drunken rants of the spokeswoman Zakhrova or the frontline dispatches of the Z-emblem marked Aleksander Kots repeatedly revealing Russia's own positions to be destroyed the next day?
Answer this, it's not like their internet personnel and infrastructure are being literally hunted and destroyed like that of the Islamic State.
Of course, it's always been like that.
You don't want to give "freedom of speech" to entities like the enemy nation's ministries in your country, this is absurd.
You're saying that YouTube, an entity known to lie constantly about anyone going against the leftist narrative, should now be believed because you don't like who they're talking about this time?
Do you see the disconnect?
The original Soviets used their own publishing houses and the Soviet-sponsored American Communist Party (distribution) for their propaganda materials in America. They didn't even think the American publishers have an obligation to print it for them on their own money. Because it's this bizarre.
Why won't Russians make a RuTube to host their (neo-Soviet) propaganda at their own servers?
Is there really some kind of moral obligation for an American company to invest their own money in spreading the propaganda of hostile countries?
I just don't understand your (weird) position.
Apparently you're just as willfully blind as that other idiot jester.
YouTube lies about everyone, there's no reason to believe they're doing anything in good faith.
You're choosing to believe they're doing this in good faith because you agree with the narrative they're selling today.
Get it yet? Probably not, don't want to trigger that cognitive dissonance.
Alright, so again, just why won't Russia make their own video hosting service for the drunken rants of the spokeswoman Zakhrova or the frontline dispatches of the Z-emblem marked Aleksander Kots repeatedly revealing Russia's own positions to be destroyed the next day?
Answer this, it's not like their internet personnel and infrastructure are being literally hunted and destroyed like that of the Islamic State.
Mofo we're not at war with Russia. Do you hold this same standard for China
There's no shooting war with China anywhere.
Not even on the Indian border where they kill each other with just sticks and stones.