1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://x.com/AFpost/status/1979738269769425255?s=20

Here's one of the PACS. I think there's another too. Also if you look at Yass's background he's one of Netanyahu's backers

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

No your reading comprehension is just shit lmao. That's not what you claimed I said. Did they not teach you context in sped you retard?

That was in regards to the legality of his self defense claim when at the time everyone was reporting that he approached Fox and not the other way around. If that were true he would not have a claim to self defense under the law. Which is objectively true.

That is not the same as your lie that "MatttheNigger is a afro-retard who says you cannot defend yourself from niggers punching you in the back." Again I have never said that nor the approximation thereof. Infact, once I saw video and reports of Fox seeking confrontation with Chud I changed my evaluation of the situation because the provocation factor was removed. This allows Chud to have a claim of self defense.

You can cry about it all you want but if he had actually sought him out and provoked a fight then he could not claim self defense. That would apply regardless of color you crybaby. I even pointed out that black gang bangers frequently provoke fights to claim self defense because just like you they're retarded and do not understand the law.

You're also a petty little liar lol

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yall are so fucking stupid it hurts. Yall operate like fucking bots. You also lie through your teeth. Quote me saying you can't defend yourself from being punched you dumb faggot. Are you still mad that you're almost always wrong about anything you say?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Yass

Give me a few hours and I'll go back and find the communist pac that donates to him as well which I've posted before. Google conveniently has pushed it down in the searches.

I'll wait for you to not apologize because you're just a sperg who knows nothing and is probably mentally ill

4
MattTheBlack 4 points ago +4 / -0

He has multiple tweets that are pro illegal as well or facilitates shit that would enable them. I'd have to go back through social media messages to compile them all but I slowly went from Pro to anti Massie over the past year for this exact reason

3
MattTheBlack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Massie literally takes jewish billionaire money and promotes open borders. You're falling for political theater. He does shit all on important issues

6
MattTheBlack 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thomas Massie open borders cuck who is funded by a billionaire jew and communist versus Fuckface Magee who is also funded by a billionaire jew

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. That's not how that works. Both could and would be charged. One would just have more serious charges than the other. It would then be up to a jury to decide. In alot of these cases the initial attacker doesn't even survive to face charges or the DA chooses to not pursue them. Fox would have still been committing assault regardless of provocation

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well homo I would just beat the dogshit out of you if you attacked me. The difference is I wouldn't escalate force and get myself in trouble for using lethal force. Also you started the shit talking so you just defeated your own point. Still no quote of me saying that Fox was justified in attacking Chud though

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

You still cannot comprehend the law clearly. You are making an emotional argument and it's irrelevant. It's hilarious actually.

I've been black since the day I was born new fag. Congratulations on being some random retard that found your way here.

3
MattTheBlack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Find me a single comment where I said the assault was justified even under provocation you gutless faggot

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't live in liberal fairy faggot country. If I did my job would be alot easier

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. Provocation will almost always nullify self defense claims. This is established law.

Find me one comment I made where I said that Fox was justified.

Also I did not make any imagined claim faggot. I based my analysis of the incident on the information that had been reported.

Again you retarded faggot I never claimed Fox was justified just that Chud couldn't claim self defense. Those are entirely different things.

2
MattTheBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is literally not even close to what I said. Another retard

21
MattTheBlack 21 points ago +21 / -0

But they had no problem with people mocking Kirk who was actually murdered and an innocent man

5
MattTheBlack 5 points ago +5 / -0

No I made an informed legal take based on the reporting from all sources at the time. You just made a reddit tier take like a retard. The law doesn't care about your feelings

23
MattTheBlack 23 points ago +23 / -0

Allegedly he sought Chud out and attacked him which means that Chud can infact claim self defense and should not even be charged. I still think that the previous attempts at justifying what would have been illegal behavior is ridiculous.

However if the new reporting is true then Chud did absolutely nothing wrong legally.

Also the wife of Fox has started a Go Fund Me for him despite the attempted murder and domestic abuse lmao

2
MattTheBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

New information indicates that Chud was approached by a career criminal and attacked unprovoked. Not the otherway around as initially reported. He should win this on self defense easily because there was allegedly no provocation on his part. Apparently he even tried to deescalate.

The sheriff is also a corrupt pos.

So there's no need to jump through hoops justifying bad actions because if true then Chud did nothing wrong.

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Black gang bangers think they can bait people into altercations, shoot them and then claim self defense. This is exactly what Chud thinks and what yall are attempting to justify. It's also why it nullifies self defense claims

1
MattTheBlack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well if you want to act like an animal because other people do then have at it. His invalid self defense claim does not become valid because other white people were maligned by the legal system.

The solution to unjust behavior isn't rewarding other unjust behavior. This is like black people claiming that black criminals shouldn't be punished because they believe that there are white criminals who are given a pass. The solution is to arrest those white criminals, not free the black criminals.

If white people are being denied valid self defense claims the solution isn't to allow invalid self defense it's to free the unjustly convicted.

If I'm stupid then you're a retard you dumb fuck. Your every argument is the low bro and low IQ shit I've come to despise in black culture. Apparently Chud Dindt Do Nuffin

3
MattTheBlack 3 points ago +3 / -0

You cannot provoke confrontations and then claim self defense and Chud has stated that he desired to do so very recently

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›