Details please. How are they built to withstand EMP? I know a fair bit about HEMP shielding so I'm curious.

"the jury recommends the death penalty, your honor."

First, don't idolize or glamorize that commie hitman. Anders Brevik actually pulled off some serious shit in comparison but nobody talks about him.

Secondly, they don't hate guns. They love a passive servant class who won't fight back.

Ditto. Running positional checks and teaching on robots has taught me that I'm not going anywhere.

I think I know the guy you're talking about, and yeah he's one of them.

And I'm not saying anyone is doing that.

I'm saying that I see too much glazing of their vile religion and subhuman race. Solely by people Iike the migtow rejects or segments of the 1488 crowd who are being alternately petulant and myopic.

No one is running for that? Minnesota? The whole state is rapidly transforming into Somalia.

And you really think the mud slimes are going to politically support mass deportations of themselves?

Dude, come on. You can say it. They're both evil, they both need to be removed, and there isn't a political solution.

Yes, here. In the past year.

right-wing

Conservative. They're not right wing.

Nobody here thinks that.

But I've seen plenty of people glazing islam.

A historically braindead take. The super wealthy have never lacked eager servants. Except now they'll need technicians and programmers to troubleshoot their troops instead of blacksmiths and quartermasters.

You're trading room and board and clothing for belts, gears, hydraulics and o-rings. And arguably a human military would still be necessary as a fallback in the event of the proliferation of EMP.

Clearly, if you object to all the bombings and killings and arsons committed by the Cuddly Puppy Club, you just must hate cuddly puppies.

Yes that's the why of them being here. Still doesn't excuse their subhuman behavior and constant criminality, their hideous appearance, their atrocious smell or the crime against the senses that is their cooking.

Send them back, kill any who resist.

Bailing water

Still has to happen or the boat still sinks. Hell, on a real wooden ship you HAVE to bail constantly while patching the hull or you can't even do that much.

Poor analogy. Remove them all, kill any who resist. They fundamentally do not belong and never will.

Further devil's advocate.

Anyone who is not expressly nationalist is not right wing anyway.

Even here, there are plenty of shills/idiots peddling the lie that the mohammadan dogs are somehow based or our allies. Either because they treat our women like their disposable toys and for some reason we don't ban anyone who posts in mgtow, or because they're currently fighting the jews and some people myopically think that there is only one problem in front of us.

No. The mud slimes are the enemy, every bit as much as the jews, the dykes, the blacks, the spics or the goddamn bureau of fish and game.

;)

Might be worth trying.

So since you've shown basically no reasoning skills beyond that of a child, I'll go ahead and use a phrase my dad taught me when I was eight.

"Don't start no SH, won't be no IT."

They wouldn't have to fear for their lives if they hadn't been doing this for sixty years.

They have plenty of leverage. Particularly the part where we can't actually win.

Arguably, such a thing would be better called conservation.

No I was mocking you but perhaps I shouldn't have considered my audience and not tried for subtlety.

By all means, elaborate if you can.

Ah yes so now we're at the part where, unable to argue the point you just throw up your hands and declare that nothing matters anyway. Forgive my shitty Catholic Latin, "Appellare ad Nihilo."

Appealing to nihilism will get you nowhere with me.

But if you were trying to say that democracy is an inherently invalid paradigm functionally indistinguishable from a Mafia state, then I'd agree and suggest it be violently overthrown. Alongside punishing those who benefitted from it.

But then we're right back around the circle again aren't we.

Alright so let's go ahead and deconstruct this.

It's not "a" bad vote. Be honest, they've been doing it their whole adult lives, almost if not every single one of them.

It's not just "bad" either. It's evil. It's evil to vote for a party that put a tax on white skin on their policy platform two years ago. It's evil to vote for taxpayer funded abortion. It's evil to vote to forcibly disarm the citizenry.

And it's not just vote. In our ridiculous system the only support that matters is what vote for. They are complicit in the results of their vote.

So what that phrase really means is a lifetime of supporting outright evil.

After all this, you can't figure out how it's not just "a bad vote"?

Surely you can connect those dots. Come on now, let's see it.

Did they vote Democrat? Or not.

I dare you to explain this without resorting to Hollywood comic book nonsense. Because I'm pretty sure I've got your measure and you aren't smart enough. But I'm a sportsman so I'll give you a chance.

In what possible way is punishing the guilty and righting q generational, nay, civilizational wrong, evil?

What could possibly be the defense of your "60%" that excuses what they have done?