mainstream culture is just marxism.
Consent to any suggested -ism is what creates a hierarchy under false authority; because to consent to suggestion represents using free will to consent to a suggestion made by the free will of another. Free will represents the sole authority over self; consenting to the free will of another represents the ignorance thereof.
It is the free will of those who suggest the -isms that then has the power to define the narrative (the mainstream) for all who consent to believe it.
I can't prove that he is, and his other behaviors have a human ring to it.
Tammuz 7, 5781 - 'Use free will of choice; get your humanity questioned'. What a world to live in.
As for proof...if we are within flow; then we can only perceive change; hence PROVE, verb transitive prov. [Latin probo.] - "to try; to ascertain some unknown quality" us trying to build comprehension by adaptation to perceived change.
Question motion; comprehend change; get inspired to question if true/false contradict change...profit.
Bot posting spam
I'm a Nigerian prince; I made $3486 last month working online; would you like to buy penis enlargement pills?
Sustenance of form within flow aka "clinging" to life over death. STICK, noun [to thrust, to shoot, and to set.] aka flow setting form aka motion setting momentum.
Who's directing the circus?
All of that and it's an "e" that inspired you to respond...amazing. I like that. Keep kicking my grammar butt.
wrong
Can you point out to where nature communicates "wrong" information to us?
dipshit
Dip - "to baptize by immersion". Where did hear I that before? tsoah rothachath - "immersed in boiling excrement". That's straight out of the so called talmud, and now you may question where "dipshit" originated from, and more importantly why you chose to propagate it?
You act in the name of God, yet use "kick ass" and "dip shit"...if I would do that "snake-tongue" would be a likely response.
Inward (inter) and unity (weave) aka unity through adherence to self sustenance as form within flow; instead of seeking unity outwards by adherence to others. Adherence to self sustenance (form to flow) represents growth of potential; which attracts others; thereby causing collective unity in adherence to individual self sustenance. A hierarchy build by adherence to need over want aka form resonating with flow.
INSPIRATION, noun (from Latin inspīrāre to breathe upon or into)
From flow into form; from motion into momentum; from ALL into ONE. Using implication (if/then) allows you to comprehend that if "upon/into"; then "from/out of"
Also; SPIR'IT, noun [Latin spiritus, from spiro, to breathe, to blow. The primary sense is to rush or drive.] aka adaptation to flow (by implied form).
My God kicked your gods ass.
You perceive conflict (reason); I point out what caused it (consent to suggested belief).
You are a fool
FOOL, noun [Heb.] - "one who is destitute of reason, or the common powers of understanding". That's another suggested inversion...the choice to adhere to perception is what builds comprehension; believing others; which causes the conflict of reason, is what represents the choice of ignorance that causes the lack of comprehension.
a false teacher
I do not offer information; i adapt to inspiration for the sustenance of self aka teach/learn self; which represents inspiration to those who choose to adhere to it. You want information (temptation), which you then judge as true vs false (conflict of reason) and which is why you consent to believe those who suggest information (temptation) aka a false authority. And you consent to their suggestions by free will of choice; which represents your sole authority over self, which you ignore by doing so.
who teaches a hollow religion
Religion (to bind anew) requires consent by free will of choice to believe a suggestion. I clearly state to utilize implication (if/then) over reason (true/false); inspiration (adaptation) over information (stagnation by belief) and need over want.
the worship of self.
Ship aka ONE vessel within ALL motion aka form within flow. You cannot worship ONEself without adherence to ALL. Consenting to believe the suggestions of other ONEs within ALL represents the ignorance of ONEs self sustenance within ALL.
"free" will of form is defined through the "dom"inance within flow; hence freedom representing coexistence of both in balance. I adhere to ALL for the sustenance of ONEself; you adhere to another ONE; while ignoring adherence to ALL; which corrupts not just the sustenance of ONEself (you), but all the other ONEs around you aka the consequences of ignorance set into motion; spreading corruption.
Ignorance represents shirking responsibility over self onto others; which is why you caste blame.
will end up with putting a globalist puppet in power in Hungary.
The blood of soros (allegedly three wives; five children) resides in Hungary.
a G-rated film being "too sexual" to some busybody
a) SEX, noun [L. sexus; from L. seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". They use rhetoric like sex to divide our comprehension of intercourse representing the choice between procreation (need for the sustenance of life) and lust (temptation luring towards death); to then exploit our ignorance to deceive us to consent to lust aka self destruction.
b) they suggest ratings to shirk responsibility for suggesting self destruction onto those who consent to it.
c) consent to believe in suggested ratings causes a conflict of reason (true vs false) between those who believe them and those who do not. That's called division (reason) by suggestion (belief).
d) "some busybody" represents you shirking responsibility over self onto others by blaming them; and also those busybodies who nonstop (in adherence to flow) report things being "too sexual" are utilizing talmudic reasoning to deliberately contradict both the believers and the non-believers. Why? To keep the conflict of reason going aka the division through suggestion; needed to maintain the ongoing flow of suggested self destruction.
As long as the many are reasoning about how filthy the suggested filth is; the few can dumb filth upon them without any opposition. Reason is not an resistance to action; it is the belief based ignorance of responsibility over choice of action (free will) ; which is btw also why the so called talmud teaches implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
The "promoter" of temptation to form represents flow. The few are racketeering the ignorance of the many towards natural law. ONE cannot stop the temptation caused by ALL; ONE needs to teach/learn responsibility over choice (free will) of action; which is needed for ONEs self sustenance as form within ALL flow.
The happy merchants of temptations ruthlessly exploit offer/consent under natural law; based on the ignorance of the majority inspiring them to do so.
Childhood innocent implies adulthood guilt...banning promotion of sodomy (defilement of procreation) to protect childhood innocence represents covering the symptoms of adulthood guilt; while ignoring the cause...the choice of ignorance of the many towards the suggested defilement of procreation (sodomy) by the few.
Why do the few suggest sodomy? To get the many to consent to the destruction of life by falling for the temptation of lust aka genocide by suggestion of temptation towards free will of choice.
to copy paste dictionary entries
It's a catch-22 for ignorance...believe that your definition is correct and the contradiction of your consented to beliefs is shown; believe in the definition I quoted and I'm gonna contradict that with a nature that doesn't use words to communicate itself.
No matter what you choose; ignorance will be unmasked; because you acted upon wants over needs. This is when I point out that consent to suggestions by believing them is what is causing the conflict of reason (true vs false); which is in ignorance of flow.
When you read and try to judge if what you read is true or false, you're stuck within the conflict of reason, caused by consenting to a suggestion. You're being deceived to perceive your entire existence as being within conflicts, and you lack the comprehension about your beliefs causing them for you.
give meaning
ALL represents predefined information; the ONEs within lack comprehension about what it means. We cannot define meaning; only build ONEs comprehension towards ALL perceived, which demands choice of adherence to ALL; not submission to believe the suggestions of other ONEs (aka the choice of ignorance towards ALL).
I only use the old dictionary entries to show a) the contradiction to what others believe; b) the rhetorical revisionism since then, and c) to put it into the perspective of natural law according to my potential (comprehension).
From my perspective this simply represents adaptation to inspiration and it immensely helps me to grow my comprehension; since I teach/learn myself while doing so. From the natural law perspective; I represent inspiration (need) and information (want) for others, which puts the responsibility of choice on them.
your ramblings
RAM'BLING, participle present tense - "roving; wandering; moving or going irregularly". a) irregular would imply not in accordance to natural law; but choice of ignorance is defined by natural law as needed for balance within motion so there's no regular vs irregular conflict; unless one chooses to believe it; b) roving: wandering; moving denotes flow; which proclaimed by us implies form within flow.
Therefore I ramble (move) in adherence to natural law as form within flow.
someone who thinks words are made up
Where within nature are you taught words? What are words describing? What inspired one to describe it through words?
Words represent the transmutation of sound by ONE out of ALL. Sound represents the communication between flow and form aka the friction; vibration; resonance of the velocity of motion meeting the resistance of momentum.
This is what our choice of adherence would resonate with; while our choice of ignorance causes dissonance from.
ethereal
E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Gr. to burn, to shine]. That denotes heat; from friction; vibration; resonance of flow meeting form aka internal communication (flow/form) of energy. The invisible aspect of ethereal represents ONEs lack of comprehension towards ALL perceived.
You're alive; which means your inception and your death are "invisible" to you; because you're moving in-between them aka you're within the temporary momentum of ongoing motion...in balance aka in response as form to flow aka responsible for adaptation by choice of action.
god "nature"
God represents a consented to false authority in ignorance of the sole authority over self (free will of choice) that was used to consent to the suggested false authority.
Nature (to be born) represents to be set into; which implies form within flow aka ONE within ALL; which (only) when comprehend implies ALL being ONE in energy aka the ONEsess of ALL. Comprehending the former represents gaining self discernment aka the balance between physical perception and mental comprehension; which establishes the comprehension of the laws of nature, which are needed as the foundation to build ONEs assumptions within ALL onto.
to come from nature or some dimwitted idea of "all"
Nature (form within flow aka ONE)
ALL (flow/form within energy).
IDE'A, noun [Latin idea; Gr. to see, Latin video.] - from responding to flow.
“to speak so as to imply something else”
Exactly...nature does not speak to communicate itself; as flow it communicates inspiration to our senses by moving form. Branding form within flow through words represents the choice of ignorance of form towards flow. That choice of ignorance is being racketeered by the few to control the many through suggestions in exchange for consent by free will of choice towards ignorance.
In short...forms suggests speech in the name of flow aka a secondary source of information (form) to the primary source of inspiration (flow). Form allegories flow as word based definitions suggested to other form...idolatry aka the exploitation of offer/consent under natural law (as defined by flow upon form).
We represent form within flow aka life moving from inception towards death; which implies constant change aka energy. What does form within flow implies for energy? Self segregation of potentiality (flow) into potential (form). This is why we are divided within momentum (form) and united within motion (flow).
In short...no coinkydink within form.
you broke character.
What if the consequences of free will of choice are further characterizing ONE within ALL (beyond the fundamental form within flow)? Like the growth of potential...
too late
LATE, adjective (from let, the sense of which is to draw out, extend or prolong). That's an allegory for self sustenance aka prolonging of form within flow through choice of action. Too much self sustenance for you?
Maybe I'm a little salty that CNN did not blackmail me?
Just kidding...right/wrong are based on consent to believe the suggested morality under the laws of men aka the curtailing of behavior through suggested moral rules; while ignoring that real morality represents the balance between need and want through free will of choice. That's why suggested beliefs aim at gaining consent by free will of choice aka submission of free will to suggestion by free will of others.
DADDY, noun - "Father; a word used by infants, from whom it is taken. The first articulations of infants or young children are dental of labial; dental, in tad, dad, and labial, in mamma, papa".
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/daddy
DAD; DAD'DLE, verb intransitive - "to walk with tottering, like a child or an old man".
http://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/dad
Now question why the parasites suggest "dad" in advertising of manhood; while suggesting "daddy" in pornography? Coincidence?
mid 16th century
If it's about origin...nature does not use words to communicate itself. We suggest words to each other in ignorance of nature; which communicates from flow to form (perceiving inspiration); while believing the suggested words (brands; idols) of others represents form to form in ignorance of flow.
makes me want to
As form within flow; the pull of flow upon form, represents the temptation to ignore adherence to self sustenance. This is why you're tempted to choose wants over needs.
wank to porn
Suggested lust (porn) in exchange for consent to self sacrifice of life (masturbation)...a soft genocide by suggestion and highly effective at that. Btw; not only is pornography being suggested as a culling tool for the masses; but also onanism (masturbation) aka self defilement.
Harassing the hasidic (pietist) aka 'tempting the strict' implies what? Strengthening of strictness. They're deliberately strengthening their core of rootlessness; so that they stay in unity when moving yet again. Mankind could learn a lot about the utilization of persecution to strengthen the "roots of rootlessness"; but for that they would first have to comprehend (and adhere) adaptation as form to flow.
The rootless few exploit the rooted many by tricking them through suggestion to ignore that the roots are planted into a flow-state (form within flow aka momentum within motion), and it is that ignorance that allows the few to uproot the many over and over again aka farming/harvesting them.
DAD; DAD'DLE, verb intransitive - "to walk with tottering (shaking), like a child or an old man".
Meanwhile; F'ATHER, noun [Latin pater.] - "he who begets a child; in Latin genitor or generator".
Once again; rhetorical wizards at play by suggesting death over life.
Consent to believe in the suggested idol "vaccine" VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.] is what causes the conflict of reason (true vs false) for anything suggested in the name of the idol...control by division through suggestion.
As long as mankind consents to suggestions; so long will those who suggest; contradict both sides of the resulting conflict of reason to stay in control.
Isn't an act against judeo-Christianity antisemtitc?
salary to $0.00
Does that imply and increase or decrease of usury based fiat currency? A salty topic...SAL'ARY, noun (Latin salarium; from sal, salt)
What if we are form within flow aka life (form) moving from inception towards death (flow) and flow represents constant change; while both true and false represent forms ignorance thereof?
Could ti be that us consenting to the suggestions of others causes us to believe "true"; which then allows others to contradict it aka "false"? Does nature offer false information?