Why can’t you refute anything I said?
There's not much to refute. Other than some historical inaccuracies on the edges, it's fairly correct.
As to questions, you didn't really ask any, other some rhetorical ones you immediately answered yourself in your blackpilled rant.
My "argument", if you'd even call it that, is just a position against violence. It only works against change, at this point.
Do you have a question?
By all accounts, every German woman and female child the Red Army came across was raped communally. The estimates of come in between 2 million and 300,000 russian rape babies. The E German population was around 18 million in 1950, occupied by soviet forces. Many young German men were dead from the war. Those babies are what, 70+ now? So 3+ generations? Seems a pretty ideal situation to significantly change the admixture.
I'm not saying that communism and authoritarianism didn't stunt IQ, just that reunification should have ameliorated the gap significantly, yet it seems to have remained wider than pure environmental factors would suggest.
And yes, IQ didn't develop equitably between central and eastern Europeans, and that too may have been environmental in nature.
Absolutely.
Yeah, but IQ didn't develop equitably. Environment can easily stunt it, but you have to have something to stunt, first. It would be interesting to see if E Germany's Bell Curve flattened, or shifted left, after the commie rape. If it shifted, that would speak to temporary environmental factors. If it flattened, that would speak to the introduction of inferior genes, relative to IQ.
Do you have an argument? You look mostly to just be ranting about Jews and glowposting.
My point is simply this. Any catalyst for change will require a loss of faith in our institutions. We're currently witnessing that faith erode. Economic hardship will accelerate that erosion better than any other event. By all means, point out specific Jewish complicity in destructive policy and cultural degeneracy. Don't glow, though. It's counterproductive.
Nothing is a better deterrent for having a child than a 15 minute conversation with the average woman of "birthing age".
I can't help but chuckle, because you're mostly correct, but that's precisely why the traditional family structure is necessary. The role of patriarch isn't just for the kids.
I appreciate the heads-up, but nah, I know what he is. Counterproductive, mostly. Honestly, there are some things desirable about a Caesar, but if you can't approach such arguments with nuance, you're not going to convince anyone.
In part, yes. And the widespread promotion of birth control, combined with the free love/tinder lifestyle. Also dual incomes to support an average household with an average quality of life. Female empowerment was a jackhammer to the family structure and individual wages. There's also the crappy jobs being filled with 3rd worlders, creating further downward pressure on wages and quality of life, serving the dual purpose of ethnic displacement and child deterrence.
It's not overt, but it's there. Seems planned. If not, it's retarded autism.
c. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; d. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
We're not full blown, but there are elements.
Yes, I'm an altruistic Anglo-Saxon. We're susceptible to the slow boil. If you can cook us while maintaining peace and general stability, you win. If you take our peace, then we become something none of us really want us to be. Don't take my peace and stability.
every government, economic system, printing press, military, education system, and communications system on earth.
Well, they control the Fed, London, and the ECB (and whatever the fuck Canada and Australia has, probably, but who cares). Strangely, Asia is our greatest protection against this complete control scenario you envision. Assets would flood into Asian markets.
One of the nice things about crypto is the difficulty of regulating capital flows. They could try, but I don't think they'd accomplish anything but destitution and revolt.
Which is a good thing, sort of.
Same as I treat everyone, individually. With cordiality, until I've discerned whether they're worth a shit. If they're not, I'll probably add to the general hostility the rest of the community has towards pieces of shit. If they are, I'll offer them a drink.
Shit always gets bad before it gets better, and we're not even to the really bad part yet. It shouldn't be reassuring.
I just hope we don't have to do things that are hard to live with before we correct course, but history says it's a naive hope.
It quite clearly can, since every single member of this society will defend it to the death, and they can literally type numbers into a computer and magically erase all economic problems with zero consequences, forever.
As a petrodollar, there are a whole lot of dollars they have very little control over. If they debase shit too much, that shit comes flooding home. Economic collapse is a viable path to reform.
Fuck yeah!