YOUR WORDS ARE VIOLENCE

I mean I wouldn't be surprised if it was a hate crime perpetrated by another black person.

Most minorities in America are notorious for homophobic tendencies. Vietnamese, Black, and Hispanic, for certain.

I can probably agree with this, but I never got to play gen 3.

For some reason my parents got my brother and sister the game but not me, even though I was way more into both games and Pokemon. Still pissed about that Christmas because it makes no sense to me.

I mean, it depends on worker intelligence.

Most of the workforce literally will feel a lot better about their job despite being underpaid if they get weekly pizza parties.

A lot of people aren't very good at thinking.

That said, the failure at retention very much is a management issue. Both the phenomena of The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting are almost entirely at the fault of terrible middle managers and high tension work environments, which also includes the woke culture where people are afraid to say what they think or speak to certain "individuals" because they assume the worst of every statement and attempt to weaponize it if you don't 'fit in'.

Nothing really wrong with gen 2 compared to gen 1 unless you're a purist. After that or R/S it started to feel a bit more empty.

Advanced forms of retardation are the best kind.

RBY being programmed in assembly language makes them more impressive then every game that came after.

Might have been SGC too. IDR.

I mean we have a little garbage pokemon and an icecream cone.

Nothing else tossed in. Just garbage an icecream.

You do realize the procedure for having a child with insurance costs more than an uninsured abortion until after the first trimester, right?

Regardless of where you stand on abortion, making it outright illegal or heavily regulated is not really a realistic option. It will still happen, it will just be unregulated, dangerous, etc., etc.

I wish people put as much energy towards foster care, adoption, etc. as they do towards abortion. People tend to not care what happens to the kid as long as it has to be born, which is the issue.

I'd prefer if abortion didn't need to be an option, and if people were just more responsible, but we have to be realistic about it.

The much better route is to encourage contraceptives, make people aware of the financial burdens, provide better tax credits and maternity leave, and a whole slew of things that would be infinitely more legislatively popular and reasonable when enforced.

I'll probably get downvoted for this here, but its the truth.

I'm assuming Twitter did a 180 on the Oppenheimer discourse and they're now attacking Japan because the majority are starting to actively reject woke-ism.

Wait did Twitter do a 180 on Japan?

Is the Oppenheimer discourse over and they're now complaining about the Japanese public starting to actively reject trans ideology?

Probably both.

Most people that don't have a religion simply don't care and don't label themselves anything. People who actively label themselves as atheists have religion, more typically Christianity, living rent-free in their heads. It basically is a religion of anti-religion.

Then you have anonymity making everyone a bit more bombastic and insufferable.

I'd agree with this if science didn't disagree with almost the entire left ideology. It was never convenient for it.

Gender dysphoria is no different than body dysmorphia. It is a mental illness to be treated, not a thing to be celebrated. It is something survived, not something to be glorified.

This isn't about science or religion, really.

Imagine if society as a whole forced you to validate some fatass that thought he was a body builder, and anything else could potentially destroy your livelihood.

That's basically the clown world we live in. That is not science.

Edit: Misread, but fuck it. I still want to say most of this, even if it isn't really applicable as a response to AnimeAnon.

Because these people don't have personalities, so they have to make their ideological fetish their entire personality.

These are the people that say "people are more than their biology" but then reduce themselves to being defined, or redefined, by nothing more than factors associated with it.

There is no logic in this ideology.

They're all deeply dissatisfied autists that never learned how to define themselves, so they latch onto any bandwagon they can so they can feel like they fit in, whether its collecting mental illnesses like pokemon cards, furries, or the trans movement.

This coming from an autist, btw. I've been through that whole song and dance. I just didn't latch onto bullshit to try to define myself.

Because Americans learn in school the damage that Christianity has caused, specifically in Europe.

Meanwhile, if the atrocities of other religions are mentioned at all, they're typically glossed over.

There's also the non-white plot armor other religions tend to have in these thought processes.

Its the difference between saying "fuck you" to the king, versus saying "fuck you" to any individual peasant. So yeah, the monotheism likely plays a huge part.

I have but its extremely rare. And honestly most were probably trolling.

Obnoxious internet atheists, however, are a dime a dozen.

I know that isn't really what they're saying.

These forms of control are surgically targeting conservatives and ignoring any and all misinformation that progressives spew, which makes trying to control the narrative at all even worse.

All they're doing is making political discussion impossible by attempting to control, rather than mediate. Makes one side feel angry, and the other feel righteous. Not a good mix.

Yeah, it wasn't always that way.

But today, despite having more information available than ever, most people refuse to engage with it for some reason.

I have a feeling it has a lot to do with smartphones and over-use of the internet. There are so many sources of low-investment dopamine that lead to zero personal growth or long-term fulfillment, unlike 20+ years ago.

Attention spans have been nuked to mere seconds for the majority.

They can't get their mind out of the 15th century.

The myth is that it was right-wing. Democrats were commonly Christian as well back then.

It wasn't attached to political views then, it was purely attached to religious views, which at the time covered both right and left.

Yeah, it wasn't right wing. Democrats tended to be Christian as well back then.

Arguably, progressive LGBTQ ladyboys are far far far more annoying than the right wing religious zealots

Ironically, most transsexuals I've seen seem to hate the trans movement.

Has anyone else noticed that?

Athiest = cringe.

Agnostic = based.