Well then don't leave comments? I didn't come and find you and start telling you to provide evidence. You came and left comments making claims about people I've followed for years. And you don't seem to have actually followed them or know anything about it. It sounds like you're telling me something you read or heard from someone else. I don't remember any of this and my experience is the exact opposite of what you're saying. Ezra was one of very few who steadfastly supported Tommy.
What are you talking about? When did this happen? I've been watching Rebel on YouTube for a long time. Back when they used to have like no subscribers. I don't remember anything that you're talking about, and you're not being specific.
Ezra sets up websites for donations for a million different causes. But he follows through though. He even goes to court and wins pretty frequently. What is shady about this? It's a public facing website where people choose whether they want to donate or not.
You're providing zero evidence of anything, and not even being specific enough to be argued with.
I was paying attention to the Tommy Robinson days, and Ezra was one of the most steadfast allies of him, and even chastised Gavin McInnes for missing any Tommy Robinson related stuff and told him to make sure he supports him.
So I don't really know what you mean by this. Maybe you could explain it, instead of just alluding to it.
Umm what? Is this a shill account? What big guys left, and why is it "rubbish" now? Who says Rubbish anyway? Are you even Canadian?
Oh. People still on Reddit are a bunch of fags.
That's the sub we're in right now. He might own it for all I know, but there is only 2 mods and neither one is him.
Wtf is this? If Mad_Hattie doesn't want to hear from him, then she can block him. Why would he be prevented from speaking because she doesn't like what he has to say? He's not PMing her, he's replying in a thread.
I personally guarantee you that this person is a woman based on that edit.
Yeah, it's a total coincidence that things just keep being set up in favor of women. They are just easily lead, not malicious.
Or maybe they are taking advantage of your naivety.
He what? He's not even a mod though?
Just point out that anti-white racism is everywhere. It's in corporate ads, all levels of schooling, media, government institutions and politicians espouse it, all major political parties in power in the western world openly say anti white things, there are no social repercussions for being anti-white.
Then ask them this. If you really hate racism, why are you only focused on a small amount of covert or ambiguous white vs non-white racism, when there is an overwhelming amount of OVERT anti-white racism?
And then tell them it's because they are actually just anti white, and don't care about racism. Because it's true. They are. Anyone who hates racism should be 100% focused on the overt anti-white racism in western society right now. If they're not, it just proves that they don't care about racism, they are just anti-white.
Why does someone come to a community like this to be such a cuck? Why not just stay on Reddit where the other cucks are? They will pat you on the back for this stuff.
The point is not to blame men, but to acknowledge how society is conditioning us ALL to objectify ourselves and others.
No it's not. The point is to create a social climate where women have basically unlimited power. And that's what you see. Even a mere accusation from a woman can ruin a man's life. Even if the accusation seems absurd on its face.
Meanwhile nothing happens with the genders reversed. Harvey Weinstein got fucked up. That guy who grabbed Terry Crews junk just went about his daily life.
And nobody cares if it's someone they support politically. This is nothing but power games where people use this shit for social and political power. The minute it harms their political or social power, they ignore it.
You are no different and just supporting it because it gives you power, not for some fake reason like hating the degeneracy in pop culture. What a silly connection you're making. An absolutely absurd connection on its face, considering the people who support this hostility toward male sexuality are also supporters of the degeneracy.
Do you think the people at Buzzfeed who wrote this article hate Cardi B and that sort of degeneracy? They absolutely do not. It's all about giving women the power to be the biggest whores imaginable, and do whatever they want without consequences, while demonizing male sexuality, so men feel less than women. And it works. Take a look at the rise of cuckoldry. Men are being psychologically tortured in to hating themselves so much that they derive pleasure from being cuckolded.
And you are supporting it because you're a woman. And you will justify anything that is in your favor. And you will always advocate for things to be more in your favor, no matter how slanted toward you things already are. Either that, or you're brainwashed by the propaganda.
What it actually is from white liberals is the socializing of their guilt in the same way that mega corps socialized their losses via bailouts. By socializing their guilt, meaning they make it about racial identity, they can make you pay for their sins. Not only can they make you pay for it, but YOU deserve it, because THEY recognize their privilege and you don't. You're a bigot and shitty person, and you ought to be the one who pays, not them.
Ever notice how white college students are on board with changing things to fuck over other white people, but they never give up their own spot? They are sick people that make other people pay for their own guilt. They are mortgaging yours and even their own children's futures to assuage their guilt.
Disgusting, cowardly people.
It's also just too highly regarded as a children's book. It's good, but people treat it like it's some amazing thing that is above similar YA fantasy series. But it's not. It's not even the best of YA fantasy from our time.
There are too many people who treat the series that way. Like it's some classic above all classics that defines its genre. But it's really not that. I liked it, but in my opinion, it's no Lord of the Rings, and there are better YA fantasy series from this time. One of which is Fablehaven. It targets the exact same audience and has magic and all that, including a magical world hidden among the real world, but it's just a better series. Its themes are more coherent, and it's just a better crafted story overall. HP ending is especially bad. And yet most people probably don't even know what Fablehaven is. The phenomenon of Harry Potter and JK Rowling doesn't make much sense to me. It far too highly regarded.
You can still have endless wars, even with trannies and women. The endless wars are for making billions and billions of dollars through funding military programs and buying military equipment. They don't care so much about winning. Notice how during Obama, ISIS was expanding despite so many drone bombings and stuff, and then Trump got in and annihilated them in a couple months? Because endless wars are for profit, not for winning or losing. They don't actually care that much, and superior technology makes sure they will always win anyway. Most of the actually "fighting" of these wars is done with a small group of people controlling autonomous drones to drop bombs on people.
Women are like those megacorps who get government bailouts. They have all the upsides, all the freedoms and rights, and none of the downsides, none of the restrictions or responsibilities.
And even conservative women are okay with this. None of them think it's important whatsoever to change that. Even if they might pay lip service to it if you ask them directly, they still never support anything that aims to change it.
Except, when it comes to women, it's not a small, vocal minority. You should check the percentages on what women support. At some point, men have to stop shielding women from the consequences of their actions. It's not noble to protect women who are treating you like garbage, but do it with a smile and soft words, and a pretense of innocence, and act as if the sacrifices they're forcing you to make imply you're noble nature.
You know why there are so many cucks in the world? So many of these degenerate relationships where 4 guys are in "polyamorous" relationships where they are all eating shit and giving up their dignity just to gain sexual access with a woman who is a 3-4/10? Why so many men are always quick to defend women even when they're being pieces of shit? Because things are actually slanted in women's favor in every single way. So even though she's about on par with them in reality or maybe even below them, the way things are set up socially/economically, her value is artificially inflated.
They sell you this narrative of what it means to be a good man. Like it's noble to constantly take it on the chin and still treat them like princesses. And men fall for it. Whether conservative or liberal.
And if you want to understand the destruction of the family. You have to understand hypergamy. Women always want someone higher in the social order than they are. But when you have gigantic salaries being handed to undeserving women, high positions that they didn't earn being given to them, and non-stop propaganda devaluing men and raising the value of women. You get women who have insane valuations of themselves, and who all think they belong with top 10% men. Women who make a lot of money still want a man who makes more than them, and view a man who makes them same amount as vastly inferior.
But even conservative women still buy in to all the liberal bullshit about building up women's self-esteem like it's too low or something. They still harshly reprimand any men who tell the truth about anything that would lower their value. They try to make it absolutely verboten, or like it's some great moral crime to mention that they get less attractive as they get older, or that being a single mother lowers their value, or even that being fat is gross. They support the fictions that artificially inflate their value. And they all support those things that are good for women at the expense of men, regardless of how unfair it is. All those divorce laws and child custody laws and taking taxes from men and giving them to women and everything. Shit even most conservative women support "gun control", and every single shitty liberal/leftist movement is primarily supported by women. They are also the main proponents of socialism/communism. But nobody will even acknowledge this, because they're afraid of standing on their own, and they know that even conservatives will attack someone who tells these truths.
People have way too much sympathy for women. They allow them to get away with virtually anything. And predictably, it creates a lot of shitty women. And in case you doubt this, just look at any research about biases. Women have an in-group bias toward other women, and men have an out-group bias toward women. And yet all we hear about is how bad women have it. Ironically, the only reason anyone even tolerates that constant complaining and bullshit about them being oppressed is precisely because it is UNTRUE. If it were true, nobody would listen to a word of that. You think in the middle east where women are actually somewhat oppressed, that people listen to women complaining about it? Obviously not. The more you hear about that kind of thing in your society, the less true it is.
People need to realize that you aren't living in a conservative world. So even if you want a setup like existed in the past, you can't have it. That's reality. All you're doing is allowing women to have all the benefits of liberal social and political policy, with none of the downsides, and still be protected against everything and treated like princesses. It's like companies who keep their windfalls and socialize their losses through government bailouts. They are experiencing none of the downsides of capitalism and the free market, and all of the upsides. This is what women do through the government as well. No matter what choices they make, even if they choose to get knocked up by some criminal scumbag piece of shit who abandons them, they still take men's tax money through the government to care for themselves. There are no negative consequences for shitty behavior of women. And not even conservatives will acknowledge it. They are more likely to attack the person pointing it out.
So I say, let women face some real consequences for once. This isn't even a real consequence. None of them will actually even be drafted.
Make no mistake, Tim sees where his market is. If Tim thought he could make more money serving a different market, he would.
And the day may come fairly soon where he actually will make more money by switching sides, and I will be proven right. Hopefully some of you begin to learn from betrayals, but I have very little hope in that regard. People seem willing to take anyone back after betrayals.
Nobody seems to be smart enough to understand that if you take someone back after a betrayal, you are just going to get betrayed all the time. Because there is always great incentive from the other side to betray people. So unless there is a great dis-incentive to betray (meaning unless you go scorched earth and destroy them for betraying you), they will betray you all the time.
Think of it like a relationship. If you take a woman (or man if you're a woman) back immediately after they cheat on you with no penalty for the cheating, what do you think will likely happen? Do you think they will then stop cheating on you and become faithful, or cheat on you again at the nearest opportunity?
This is braindead nonsense. If you think that they are going to let up when enough people are vaccinated, you're about as smart as AOC.
What segment did he supposedly say this in?
Yes, actually, it is. And that's why you'll never hear about it in any mainstream source.
Wow, what an incredible odyssey. Thank you for detailing it for me. I no longer have any desire to play that mod. Also a ghoul rape fanfic with 100 chapters? Lol. Fucking clown world. What is wrong with human beings?
You're defaming someone without evidence. And when asked for evidence, you say you didn't come to argue or provide evidence. That's not a reasonable position. And despite that, I've been pretty civil with you. Even though someone who does that deserves zero respect.
Catcalling doesn't mean what you think it does. I'm definitely not catcalling you. You sound like a shill that doesn't even speak English.