Briefly the reason is that it makes sense to protect women and children above adult men. Morally women are much less capable of defending themselves and (for most of history) providing for themselves. Practically it's important to protect women from hostile forces because it's harder for one woman to birth many children than one man to father many children.
Sure, and then everyone can have a Hapsburg jaw because you killed most of the men and everyone's related. And who will build your society back up? Certainly not the self-absorbed narcissists.
Women will always clamor for protection and assurance. Moreover, even if women were truly forced to exist on an interchangeable level with men, they would be cut down economically and even physically, since they literally have to play by different rules just to survive. Social decay and death will follow.
Yes, because the pro-woman society is so good.
"Equal rights for equal lefts" is a fun way of thinking, but ultimately unworkable and an acceptance of the utopian doctrine that men and women are equal.
"If you don't let women be provided for, the left wins" is a stupid fucking argument.
Taking away economic protectionist measures for women (such as women in STEM programs) is a great idea and necessary, but moves to push women into men's hardships, such as making women eligible for the draft, must only be conceived as accelerationist measures intended to ultimately restore traditional roles.
There is no restoring traditional roles. The DeSimps, the WEF and all of women's allies will learn after pouring billions into propaganda like "Great Replacement" and "groomers" to try and make us ally with them. Our future is SK. A non-violent gender war where the winner takes all.
They do. Just all of it is dark and evil.
No, it didn't. The increase in downvotes since I said it just proves how fragile your narrative is.
Still mad I called out the tradcuck terrorist?
Women clinging to their privileges. There is only one gender, the other is [removed for Rule 16]
She literally is. Are you questioning the validity of my claim? I have the archive of her page.
It seems they're the only people who can start discussions on closing women's spaces. It's one step to remove all restrictions, the next one is to close them all down and bleed the enemy dry trying to keep them funded.
AI will finally shut the tradcucks up about birth rates. There'll be less jobs than people because of it and population reduction will be a good thing.
I think a lot of the new things will die off, like Augmented Reality/Mixed Reality, but AI will change things for the better, as long as we keep the enemy out of the coding.
Bullshit. Women have got you trained to attack when they ask.
100% this is because Kotick called out malicious acts by regulators to take control of ATVI from him.
They think you're stupid. The WEF backed "women's spaces" in 2019.
Facts don't care about woman worshipper feelings.
Interesting...
Kotick sees regulators fanning the flames that led to the Journal’s exposés. He believes his biggest mistake was failing to forcefully defend the company and his legacy to the Journal and in his public statements.
This confirms the anti-pride agenda has something to do with them...WSJ is Murdoch media, isn't it? Murdoch is all in DeSimptis, and his media is full of boycott calls. Murdoch put a woman in charge of the WSJ not too long ago.
Long live Activision #ApproveTheMerger
Edit : Woman worshippers need to focus more on avoiding their desires to kill kids and less on coding downvote bots.
Vodafone is a Kering Foundation ally.
Steam/Valve did a women's day sale IIRC. ProtonMail are Feds.
Set in China, right? Maybe avoiding offending the CCP?
I don't see how DeSimptis being tanked is a bad thing.
Trump 2024. 45-47.
Username checks out.
My theory regarding "Great Replacement" is that women think a population crisis will bring a tradcuck revival and all will be forgiven "for humanity's future"
It sort of worked in SK, where the people were promised a "war on women" and got family tax relief because the birth rate fell to .8 and that's "more important".
Similar tactics worked in China and Japan, where laws that protect men from women's harm are being repealed because "birth rates". Kishida's first speech was about how "we have to deal with the population crisis", and now Japan is changing rape law so that it's easier for women to make false accusations.
Anyone who speaks about higher birth rates, anti-whiteness or anything similar is planning to sell you out to women.
Best strategy is natural decline with issues mitigated by automation and technological advances - A truce with them should never be considered without heavy concessions and admission of guilt.
They don't consider men human beings.
I thought about it once. But any procedure recommended to us by women is suspicious.
The WEF supported women's side in the trans debate, you lying cunt.
By your logic, I'm the only one with the correct answer, because my answer of killing off women's sports, spaces and privileges disadvantages the WEF backed feminists and the trans movement.
So...from one man-hating ideology that causes suicide to the other one that's second on the list.
Nobody sane should want a resurgence in neo-Puritan marriage shills who want us all enslaved.
Typical of them.
They want tradcuck slaves.
Because if you don't dedicate your attack to Islam, you don't get the virgins.
Also, you have to sacrifice yourself.
He did neither. Tradcuck finally snapped - Probably thought he was "sparing the kids living through Sodom and Gomorrah".
People unhinged/brainwashed enough to support marriage should be watched.
They just weren't feminist enough.
irrelevant
It was shown at the same show, nearly straight after...
Is this the one where he endorses DeSimptis?
And? That's probably part of her WEF script.
The left wins because they gatekeep so hard.
63% of them, with over 80% of the "breeding age" women.
Every woman I've met here has been a two-faced race baiter who changes ideologies like clothes to avoid being noticed, and games reports to avoid being caught.