-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +6 / -19

Google, Elon Musk, Ken Griffin, Melinda Gates, the establishment GOP, the WEF and way more want us to give in to women.

They want an ineffectual right that fights women's non-issues rather than national problems.

We can't give it to them.

Fuck this bullshit agenda. The astroTERFing ends here. Feminists have no place on the right, and nobody cares about pride parades either negatively or positively outside of those who take part.

-18
TheImpossible1 -18 points ago +4 / -22

Take them from women and I'll support you.

  • Women backed Jim Crow laws the most.

  • Women did not fight to end slavery.

  • Women had their own branch of the KKK.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +4 / -9

The article Google don't want you to read.

Author's statement.

We will never surrender the right to feminists.

Google, Elon Musk, Ken Griffin, Melinda Gates, the establishment GOP, the WEF and way more want us to. They want an ineffectual right that fights women's non-issues rather than national problems.

We can't give it to them.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

Explain Trump and Depp both having female lawyers.

And please don't say the "Depp is a leftist, they protected him" because we both know they wanted that scalp more than their next breath.

Maybe it's as simple as paying them off by hiring them gets them off your back temporarily.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +3 / -12

I don't understand it either, but it's how it works.

-10
TheImpossible1 -10 points ago +5 / -15

President Trump hired a female feminist lawyer to get out of the E Jean Carroll show trial.

Johnny Depp did the same.

You can't defeat the enemy in court, without...the enemy. It's kind of counter-intuitive.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +2 / -7

It's new to see mainstream media pick it up.

Usually it's online dumping grounds for controlled opposition.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +8 / -15

You're making the same argument someone on TD made.

Both articles are WaPo. You have to be living under a rock to not notice the pivot from "men should die" to "men need help".

They want to portray themselves as good allies so that we'll forget what they did to us.

I say fuck them, and fuck the war they want us to fight in, and the spaces they want us to protect. We owe them nothing.

He's a rabid, turbo feminist who donates to Planned Parenthood, produces feminist propaganda, and his legal team was a feminist yenta clown car.

Hollywood got worse after he fell, don't deny it.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +2 / -7

But if that's why, why did he suddenly turn to promoting the "good women" spiel lately?

The answer is obvious. Build a following, lead them down the wrong path for women's benefit, get paid by the establishment.

Unfortunately for him, they don't keep their promises. He'll die in jail.

-4
TheImpossible1 -4 points ago +2 / -6

He was telling teenage boys that women were trash who look to exploit naive men. Who else could do that?

But now he isn't even doing that, so he's no longer worth supporting. He can go down with the other tradcons like Elon "No kids, no vote" Musk.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +4 / -7

You have to be pragmatic when you're fighting a battle of this scale. Anyone who seems to be denting their armor becomes your ally, regardless of ethics. You're preventing something far worse.

That's also possible, but the intense coverage of his rise makes me think this crap is as scripted as the "Republicans" talking about women's sports.

Lure broken men in, pretend you're fighting the enemy with them. Sell them a lie that good ones are out there.

Tate didn't realize they were going to destroy him too when he sold us out.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +2 / -8

Don't you mean NAWALT? AWALT would be agreeing with me.

I'm not fine with it, but at the time, it seemed that he was doing something to the enemy.

Now it's obvious he was a reverse psychology ploy from them, a perfect false flag who will lead the weak to metaphorical slaughter and allow them to crack down on "misogyny" after his arrest.

-7
TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +2 / -9

saying a non-evil woman exists?

This one.

Imagine positioning yourself as the savior of young men from a feminized society and then repost this crap.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +2 / -7

Max Mosley finally has company in his club.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

A good way to have a high level of cognitive dissonance is to be a male radfem, such as Matt Walsh.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +1 / -9

I disagree. There are plenty of people who have kids who are still massive failures.

Women chase after ex-cons and more people in juvenile detention have had sex than MIT graduates.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +3 / -5

I don't think anyone with views like hers should be allowed a child, especially a boy.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +1 / -10

Well, despite the fact everyone who is eligible to be voted for is the same pro-woman garbage...the fact you have a choice makes it democracy, just a flawed one.

That's the most disturbing thing you've ever said.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›