Hard to blame
Wokeists: "Hold my beer soy latte"
What irks me is that you cannot even suggest the possibility that there might be some measure of financial incentive at stake here. If you do, you're lumped in with the flat Earthers and co.
Apparently, every pharmaceutical company turned into humanitarian organisations whose one and only goal is to save the world by providing medicine at cost price.
Yes, let this be your welcome.
It's an interesting hypothesis. I wish I knew what was true. I can only hope that the truth eventually comes out one day while we're still alive.
My understanding of what the Fabian Society is has improved somewhat.
Previously, it was some vague, nebulous intuition of them being a bunch of power-hungry megalomaniacs who think that the only way for us all to Save the World:tm: is by everyone granting them the power to be in control of everything.
Now I understand that they are, indeed, a bunch of totalitarians who think that our only chance at arriving at utopia is if they get a turn at holding the wheel.
This is the exact joke I was going to post :')
Could these people possibly gaslight even harder?
Nothing like a supersized serving of schadenfreude to go with my coffee in the morning.
Between this, and him accidentally debunking his own racist nonsense a few days ago, Kendi sure is having a rough week. :).
No one mentioned the Microsoft Sidewinder joystick and that makes me sad.
Sure, there are a plethora of superior HOTAS options these days, but that one will always hold a special place in my heart.
Coming this winter, from the producers who brought you "Just two more weeks to flatten the curve", is...
"Just two more boosters to Save the World™".
Showing soon in a totalitarian hellhole near you.
It's good to see people standing for their principles.
somewhere
S-I-T-T-I-N-G in a tree
I wonder how the people in that police unit feel, knowing that people are being raped, stabbed, and murdered every day, and instead of doing something about it, they instead spend their days arresting people for swapping edgy banter with their mates.
I read Atlas Shrugged in 2017. Had I read it 5 years earlier, I would have dismissed all the antagonists as hilariously one-dimensional strawmen. But in these days of Clown World, I'm not so sure anymore.
The repudiation of the Committee of Ten was reinforced by a companion report proposing that history, economics, and geography be dropped at once. What Cardinal Principles gave proof of was that stage one of a silent revolution in American society was complete.
Children could now be taught anything, or even taught nothing in the part-time prisons of schooling, and there was little any individual could do about it.
Cardinal Principles assured mass production technocrats they would not have to deal with intolerable numbers of independent thinkers—thinkers stuffed with dangerous historical comparisons, who understood economics, who had insight into human nature through literary studies, who were made stoical or consensus-resistant by philosophy and religion, and given confidence and competence through liberal doses of duty, responsibility, and experience.
— John Taylor Gatto,The Underground History of American Education
I look forward to the Soylent Green/Make Room! Make Room! future where I need to procure my steaks from black market smugglers.
To play Devil's Advocate, there are plenty of men these days who aren't strong and capable either :^)
I know you dislike women, and so I'm curious: what is your opinion on companies that encourage young women into becoming online prostitutes?
I love Callum's constant look of absolute disgust when they talk about anything related to thottery.
"Callum, what do you think about women on online dating sites?" "Whores."
The article they read is pretty depressing too. The women are throwing away their opportunity of having a normal happy marriage one day, and the men, despite all their money and success, still have to resort to hiring someone (who hates them) to listen to their idle musings.
You've probably seen it already, but here's a great interview between Stefan Molyneux and Tristan Tate on running a camgirl company: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DDUOJpk7FWQ/
That's one of the issues I have with sites like these — they've lowered the barriers to entry for young women, up to the point where they can ruin their entire lives with a few taps on their phone.
Even if their promises of untold riches were true (and most people here know that it's only the top x% making bank), these women aren't being made aware of the permanent and irreversible consequences that this will have. When If they have any regrets in 10 years time, there is no undo button. But when you are young and impressionable, no one thinks that far ahead.
Yes, they are adults and they should be allowed to make their own decisions in life, but I do not agree with a system that encourages young women to become digital prostitutes, whilst painting over the stigma with a coat of 'sexual liberation'.
I agree they're not victims, and that they're voluntarily purchasing these services.
But it still bugs me in the same way I get bugged by televangelists take advantage of desperate people, people selling homeopathic medicine for serious ailments, or shady loan sharks preying upon debt-ridden people.
I don't think OnlyFans should be banned, because that's a slippery slope to head down, but I do think that sites like these which are based upon allowing the customer to engage with the performer, will lead towards more serious issues down the line, in way that is way worse than say, strip clubs or brothels.
I miss the times when joking about having to pay people to (pretend to) be your friend was just a joke.
Come on dude, you know they don't care.
They think those "losers" deserve being taken advantage of financially and emotionally, and are at the same time the evil oppressors forcing these poor innocent women to engage in sordid acts.
They're literally changing it, and they are doing it on purpose.
They don't want the people in their group to be able to have an honest, frank, reasonable conversation with "The Enemy".
Today, not only are both groups operating on a completely different set of definitions for common words, the far left are pushing more and more for the idea that the words themselves have no meanings, and all the meaning is in the interpretation of the person reading or hearing them.
It's ridiculous.