-1
Suchinternet -1 points ago +1 / -2

I don't disagree about power jannies skewing articles, but that would still be a problem even if you assume the platform is 100% neutral.

-3
Suchinternet -3 points ago +1 / -4

I know there have been some edit wars and see resulting biased articles, but overall I think its a great concept and well executed. Its not like you can create a completely neutral encyclopedia using volunteers in the current political climate.

-29
Suchinternet -29 points ago +1 / -30

Wikipedia is legit amazing and deserves donations. They're just diverting the money elsewhere.

-2
Suchinternet -2 points ago +4 / -6

I like that the article achnowlages how amazing wikipedia is. Even though its no longer totally neutral its still the largest and least biased repository of human knowlage ever created. It saddens me to hear that my donations instead of funding that, have been funding woke activism. I'll be donating elsewhere in the future.

by folx
2
Suchinternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point.

by folx
11
Suchinternet 11 points ago +12 / -1

Small tits can probably get the job done most of the time. But big is better.

by folx
13
Suchinternet 13 points ago +15 / -2

Anyone who's had kids knows exactly why large tits are attractive. For like 6 months after a baby is born they do work. I did not understand until I saw it for myself. Its so much milk easily 32oz a day. Maybe even 64. Big tits = strong hardy babies.

2
Suchinternet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alternatives?

6
Suchinternet 6 points ago +6 / -0

What's better?

5
Suchinternet 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's not unlike how they insist that all people and cultures are equal despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

5
Suchinternet 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree, did you read my second sentence?

10
Suchinternet 10 points ago +13 / -3

Well he did say shithole countries.

He should offer any lefty that felt offended by that an expenses paid vacation to one of those countries.

8
Suchinternet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ever since Biden got up on stage with a straight face and said "if everybody wears a mask this will be over soon" I knew this administration would be a disaster. Anyone with half a braincell knows thats not how epidemics work. Even if the masks were effective, the effect would be to make the pandemic longer. Thats literally what "flatten the curve" means. Spread out the curve over a longer time to reduce hospital load. The incompetence is unbearable. /rant

9
Suchinternet 9 points ago +9 / -0

The left is seriously running this nation into the ground, and I don't say that lightly. With the glacial pace of government, its actually impressive that they've been able to make so many terrible policy changes so fast. I don't remember Democrat congresses in the past ever running things this poorly. Maybe an oldfag can weight in.

1
Suchinternet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Believe me I'm no fan of megacorps, but I find that most government regulation makes things worse, not better.

Good regulation requires that the government 1. Understands the problem well enough to fix it, and 2. Actually wants to fix the problem, as opposed to paying it lip service and then just supporting big business for for those sweet kickbacks. I think it's very rare for both of those things to be true.

1
Suchinternet 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you just want to double down and increase state control further?

-2
Suchinternet -2 points ago +1 / -3

Just don't buy that car. I will admit that once a whole industry becomes monopolized regulation may be necessay, but at this point you still have alternative options.

8
Suchinternet 8 points ago +8 / -0

Just remeber, however bad things are, there are people out there actively working to come up with something worse.

6
Suchinternet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thanks, you never know ifnthese things are real without a source.

27
Suchinternet 27 points ago +30 / -3

DomitiusOfMassilia is a reddit style terrible and overbearing mod. Not surprising in the least.

4
Suchinternet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Govt: "you are no longer allowed to bear arms, this does not infringe your right to bear arms."

view more: Next ›