Anyone who's had kids knows exactly why large tits are attractive. For like 6 months after a baby is born they do work. I did not understand until I saw it for myself. Its so much milk easily 32oz a day. Maybe even 64. Big tits = strong hardy babies.
There is a bit more to it than that. If a female doesn't receive consistent nutrition for a critical few years of her puberty, her boobs don't grow. Anorexic girls who starve themselves during puberty (about 12 to 15 or something?) don't resume growing where they left off. They just miss out.
So while small boobs are not necessarily a sign of poor childhood nutrition, large boobs are always a sign of good childhood nutrition. Maternal childhood nutrition is expressed in epigenetics in the next generation. Poorly nourished mother = small, less healthy babies.
Want to see examples of this in the wild? Look at the sizes of Japanese women following WWII. After the USA took over, the Japanese people got decent access to protean for almost the first time ever. The USA made sure that the Japanese nation bought a lot of US Produce, including meat. Japanese women went from being short and skinny with little boobs to being all different shapes and sizes, including some very gifted ladies.
So you are right. Big tits = strong hardy babies with well formed organs and many other benefits.
Anyone who's had kids knows exactly why large tits are attractive. For like 6 months after a baby is born they do work. I did not understand until I saw it for myself. Its so much milk easily 32oz a day. Maybe even 64. Big tits = strong hardy babies.
There is a bit more to it than that. If a female doesn't receive consistent nutrition for a critical few years of her puberty, her boobs don't grow. Anorexic girls who starve themselves during puberty (about 12 to 15 or something?) don't resume growing where they left off. They just miss out.
So while small boobs are not necessarily a sign of poor childhood nutrition, large boobs are always a sign of good childhood nutrition. Maternal childhood nutrition is expressed in epigenetics in the next generation. Poorly nourished mother = small, less healthy babies.
Want to see examples of this in the wild? Look at the sizes of Japanese women following WWII. After the USA took over, the Japanese people got decent access to protean for almost the first time ever. The USA made sure that the Japanese nation bought a lot of US Produce, including meat. Japanese women went from being short and skinny with little boobs to being all different shapes and sizes, including some very gifted ladies.
So you are right. Big tits = strong hardy babies with well formed organs and many other benefits.
It’s always hilarious when a woman is fat with small tits
If you're going to be fat as a woman, at least make sure your tits are too. Otherwise, what's the point?
FTFY
Good point.