1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

US strategy completely bypassed Iran's strategy, which would have been brilliant and effective otherwise.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Say you don't understand anything about this situation at all, without having to use those words.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

This war is primarily about "leveling London," financially. If you want to understand what's happening in the world, follow the money; always follow the money. When DJT says "no one will be allowed to extort the world," he's not talking about Iran. London has controlled it for 100 years, that's what he's aiming at.

"If you try to shoot the King, you'd better not miss."

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Davos is the priority, it just has to be at the right time.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Almost nobody understands what he was about. He didn't start FM or SRA, and it didn't end with his disappearance, either. (Death or otherwise)

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

You comprehend nothing about this war. You could learn ...

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aaaargh, lol.

This remains to be seen 🍿

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

The only way to "open" the strait is by invading and taking control over the ENTIRE Iranian coast line.

That's completely false. Generals always try to fight the last war. That being said, this war is not over until the SoH is actually open, which it obviously is not.

Further, the lack of inbound tankers is only now starting to hit other regions. The spike in prices at the pump has so far been price gouging, the actual cost increase hasn't hit yet. After the shortage of supply hits, it still has to go through refining and distribution. This wouldn't be a quick fix even if the Strait magically returned to normal in an instant.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

China doesn't "freely pass," as measured by total volume through the Strait. Normal is 138 ships per day, it's been single digits since the war started. That's not "passing freely," no matter what raghead propaganda says.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

WWIII started, many years ago. You're defining Revolutionary War, which has been necessary for a much longer time.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's more to it than that. Iran's intent is for only Iran to use the Strait. This action by DJT is to level the playing field so that either nobody can use it (first) or everybody can.

That's the war starting today, nothing else matters and being in no rush to get to this part was a strategic decision. Everyone expected it on day 1. Reasons for waiting are only starting to come into view; we'll see if it was a good decision.

I think there aren't any mines, simply because Iran relies on the entire waterway, too. Most mines aren't confined to a precise location. The major exception lie dormant on the bottom and (theoretically) launch themselves up into ships, under predetermined conditions. The best time for these to have been laid would have been when DJT first sent aircraft carriers, over a month before starting the war. These are the most expensive type of mine, and hopefully what Iran has the fewest of. Sweeping this type is also the hardest.

Certainly the region needed to be swept. (Or still does?)

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

China can't freely pass, the commercial traffic that's normally 138 ships per day has been single digits since the war started. Yes this is an act of war but stop believing raghead propaganda.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because you're a single issue poster, not MAGA.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those aren't Pastors at all. Ezekiel chapter 34. Yes, the whole chapter. Any translation you will read. (I could recommend some that are good to start with) I won't copypasta a quote here, get the whole chapter for context. By no means is this the only relevant passage, just a solid starting point for the topic.

2
SicSemperTyrannis2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought impaling traitors was legal according to the constitution

It's not.

1
SicSemperTyrannis2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where. Quote what I said. Be specific.

I already did.

You're too stupid to be able to read.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›