15
RussianAgent13 15 points ago +15 / -0

LOL I noticed the same thing with various tv shows and comedies talking about butt plugs. Like I always knew it as some gay thing so yeah it's a funny topic for jokes, but they were acting like it's a toy everybody uses. (i.e. normalizing it) I'd literally never heard of a straight person using butt plugs before that.

18
RussianAgent13 18 points ago +18 / -0

That headline makes it even more Clown World. "Teacher had ‘sexual relationship with boy under 14 for THREE YEARS until he called police begging for help’"

3
RussianAgent13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I worded that weird, but I'm aware. :)

Can't remember if the first big canary was Alex Jones or Milo Yiannopoulos.

1
RussianAgent13 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appreciate the commitment to federated tech, but maybe you should shift focus towards something more personal instead of offering to be a new KIA hangout.

For example you could write articles about gamergate topics and occasionally link to them from here. If your content is good enough you'll build your own community in alignment with this one.

It's up to you of course. I wish you luck. Always good to have backups at least.

17
RussianAgent13 17 points ago +17 / -0

People have always boycotted companies. We buy from the companies we want to support. That's how the market works.

The most dangerous aspect of cancel culture, IMO, is companies cancelling customers. There have always been cases where a business has to cut off a damaging relationship with a customer, or kick someone out of a store, but generally the customer is king. (in Japan: customer is god)

The new trend of companies refusing service to supposedly controversial people is a dangerous shift of power from the individual to the corporation. (another flavor of that is entertainment producers intentionally ignoring what their fans want)

This is just a T-shirt store but it becomes dangerous when platforms, banks, and airlines start doing it.

3
RussianAgent13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sue the sheriff and brig. general for slander, and WP for defamation. They're free to do their jobs and charge "law breakers" as they see fit, but they don't get to tell the media you're a bad person who acted without provocation if you can show in court that any reasonable person would do the same thing.

6
RussianAgent13 6 points ago +7 / -1

The Libertarian Party is controlled opposition meant to siphon votes away from the GOP, and they're still worthless at that.

7
RussianAgent13 7 points ago +7 / -0

This also raises the question of why China was researching such harmful viruses in the first place, which everyone seems to ignore.

A lot of assumptions that it was a bioweapon, but scrubbed articles from a few years ago were speculating that the Wuhab lab was working on viruses that they can then develop the vaccine for and profit from "curing".

4
RussianAgent13 4 points ago +4 / -0

So maybe it was accidentally released before it was ready.

7
RussianAgent13 7 points ago +7 / -0

Rudy and Bannon's friend from China said it was intentional. (not just intentionally engineered but released) I'm not 100% sure she wasn't part of a propaganda campaign though.

11
RussianAgent13 11 points ago +11 / -0

In much the same way the vast majority of the medical community has thrown away medical ethics and decided to mass distribute an experimental drug to young, healthy adults and children.

4
RussianAgent13 4 points ago +7 / -3

I just stumbled on here from an outside link, and I'm starting to think the same thing. I'm not a fan of loli but I've never thought of "real" kids when I saw it. I assume people who like anime porn have a particular fetish - like furries. Generally loli fans wouldn't like CP, furries aren't into bestiality. In reverse, pedophiles and dog-fuckers might be into loli/furry art because they see everything through a sick lens, but it's probably not as satisfying as the real thing to them.

view more: ‹ Prev