She looks so menacing. /s
Everything in the scene is wrong.
-
They keep the robot in a box.
-
The robot's crate is new
-
The robot is old and warn
-
How did they move such a massive crate containing a heavy duty robot to it's location to the center of the clearing alongside the other boxes?
-
why did they not offload those boxes to their actual destination? They flew them there after all.
-
how did they move those boxes, when they only have fighting robots and not moving robots?
-
Were there moving robots not shown?
-
The box the robot is packed in is filled with cool air for some reason that rushes out.
-
They pick up a box for a robot to hand it to it, thus doing more work than the bot will do carrying the box
-
They are flying around with excess weight they need to off load
-
There aren't even enough boxes to warrant unpacking the bot
-
This excess weight includes one single fighting robot, out of an entire army that refuses to fight.
-
They carried the box containing the robot to that location, as apposed to simply having it walk to that location
-
There is no reason to have a garrison, or any of that gear at that location
-
Again, why is the bot in a box?
-
The few boxes that need to be moved were moved to that location, only to be moved to another
-
Zack constructed this scene to give the audience information, while simply not understanding the logistics of moving boxes efficiently, utilizing the robot in the scene.
It would be easier to list the number of scenes that make sense in this movie, as that list would be zero.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/rebel_moon_part_1_a_child_of_fire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzczijDtnFY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ATnBuOMOZY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-s4jYm9Mz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDTOD94YRpY
Because you think that I am a spaz, this makes you hope that I am a bot. Got it.
They're writing the names of the movies before writing the scripts. Can work for a title of an episode of Rick and Morty, but not a movie named Rebel Moon, where you write those rebels as simple farmers using horse drawn plows.
What an odd thing to say.
I too carry around the living bodies of my enemy in boxes. Until daily chores intervene.
Themes should never take center stage before story.
And Zack Snyder should never be allowed to do anything in the movie industry beyond holding a mic boom.
Because it's such a simple scene. He is so profoundly dumb he doesn't even know how to do basic daily chores, such as carrying boxes. It is indicative of how dumb he is.
Could I have chosen any scene in his movie? Yes, and there is lies the problem. He has no talent, and must be being paid by his friends for reasons besides being a good story teller.
And you store that old robot in a new box, that you carry around? Yes. I am missing context here that would make any of that make sense. It has legs, have it walk to where you wish for it to perform it's job.
He wrote a scene, where someone picks up a box, and hands it to a robot.
This movie, costed 166 Million. He may be the producer, but ultimately, Netflix footed the bill and paid him for this. If you have a Netflix account, this came out of your wallet, and it's below Bollywood quality.
I didn't mention the editing. At all. It's a robot. Why is it in a box? Why are there three people there. Why does it get out of a box, among boxes? Who placed those boxes there? Why does steam come out of the box? Who, why is someone allowing him to make these movies? And more importantly; How did his adopted daughter die? Who allowed him to adopted a Chinese national?
My Monitor was 800x600 back then. When I switched to LCD, I used portrait mode for browsing. Excuses are not the same as valid excuses.
So they chose to use close up shots of a stage performance, and stage makeup meant to be viewed by audience members 100 feet away. Clearly they have no idea how to film or choreograph such a show.
As for the vocals, and the song itself. That was just shit. Maybe Tina Turner or Dolley Parton could have made this work back in their prime. But I don't know what that was.
But I agree with this.
-
I can post whatever I want
-
I don't have to post things you like
-
I don't have to consider your feeling
I was not prepared for that.
I think people are reading way too much into my statements, while continuing to defend a magical sex changing boy lover who changes peoples sex. I mean, come on. I didn't do that. That's what One Piece fans have been accepting and defending for the past decade. They put Sanji in a dress for God's sake!
Let me reiterate this. It's not that it's 'fiction', it's that it's 'fantasy'. As in Trannys are not real, as the whole world it takes place in is 'magical'. It's all based on magic. Unlike the real world, where such people can not actually exit, outside of a few thousand hermaphrodites being exploited for a grift.
And none of this seems to be getting through to anyone here. People are assuming since, I acknowledge that this is fiction, I am pushing trans as acceptable, and for kids. That's quite the gap to jump.
Because I said, "They're not wrong. But they are also not right."
It's a tranny. Pretending it is not, is an entire community tricking themselves by extolling Japanese gay boy love culture.
you seem not to understand what pronouns are.
Correct. I do not care.
Unsurprisingly for someone trying to equivocate for allowing troon propaganda
That's what you, and people like you have been doing this whole time in accepting this story line, and not simply addressing it as fantasy fiction unfit for children.
50 years of goal post moving and suddenly, this localization is too far. You'll forget about it tomorrow, as you accept this, and continue to blame me.
New Kama is not a pronoun, it is a proper noun my friend, the capitalization is a clue for you for next time.
Again, I do not care. Keep your pronoun knowledge to yourself.
I see your point.
Now I just need to figure out why people find this comments to be controversial:
They're not wrong. But they are also not right.
Or this one:
It's important to remember that this is a fictional world.''
Which were the only two points I made, that seems to be drawing a negative reaction. That everyone wants to down vote, yet not address.
So they are using the wrong pronoun for a fictional magical sex changing tranny? Again, I must ask what is the controversy? The character is inappropriate for young children regardless to which words you use.
Just as Rocky Horror is.
Nothing like real life. Correct. Fiction. Wait... Or is that exactly like real life? As real life is now fiction?
i'm done engaging with your at best 3/10 baiting attempts, buddy
Nice bait. 10/10. Honestly, if you were truly done. You wouldn't have said anything.
No you need to pick one. This story has never been 'for kids'. The localization issue isn't about trannies. It already went wrong 20 years ago with 4kids adopting this for daytime TV.
And that rating is also clearly too low.
Hey, I asked about the translation in this fictional fantasy story for adults. Not a minutes reading of your local DNC meeting.
So, do you consider this translation a concern, and why?
I just want to know why they are dancing at a gas station.