1
Questionable 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think people are reading way too much into my statements, while continuing to defend a magical sex changing boy lover who changes peoples sex. I mean, come on. I didn't do that. That's what One Piece fans have been accepting and defending for the past decade. They put Sanji in a dress for God's sake!

Let me reiterate this. It's not that it's 'fiction', it's that it's 'fantasy'. As in Trannys are not real, as the whole world it takes place in is 'magical'. It's all based on magic. Unlike the real world, where such people can not actually exit, outside of a few thousand hermaphrodites being exploited for a grift.

And none of this seems to be getting through to anyone here. People are assuming since, I acknowledge that this is fiction, I am pushing trans as acceptable, and for kids. That's quite the gap to jump.

Because I said, "They're not wrong. But they are also not right."

0
Questionable 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's a tranny. Pretending it is not, is an entire community tricking themselves by extolling Japanese gay boy love culture.

you seem not to understand what pronouns are.

Correct. I do not care.

Unsurprisingly for someone trying to equivocate for allowing troon propaganda

That's what you, and people like you have been doing this whole time in accepting this story line, and not simply addressing it as fantasy fiction unfit for children.

50 years of goal post moving and suddenly, this localization is too far. You'll forget about it tomorrow, as you accept this, and continue to blame me.

New Kama is not a pronoun, it is a proper noun my friend, the capitalization is a clue for you for next time.

Again, I do not care. Keep your pronoun knowledge to yourself.

-3
Questionable -3 points ago +1 / -4

I see your point.

Now I just need to figure out why people find this comments to be controversial:

They're not wrong. But they are also not right.

Or this one:

It's important to remember that this is a fictional world.''

Which were the only two points I made, that seems to be drawing a negative reaction. That everyone wants to down vote, yet not address.

-4
Questionable -4 points ago +1 / -5

So they are using the wrong pronoun for a fictional magical sex changing tranny? Again, I must ask what is the controversy? The character is inappropriate for young children regardless to which words you use.

Just as Rocky Horror is.

-4
Questionable -4 points ago +1 / -5

Nothing like real life. Correct. Fiction. Wait... Or is that exactly like real life? As real life is now fiction?

-2
Questionable -2 points ago +1 / -3

i'm done engaging with your at best 3/10 baiting attempts, buddy

Nice bait. 10/10. Honestly, if you were truly done. You wouldn't have said anything.

-3
Questionable -3 points ago +1 / -4

No you need to pick one. This story has never been 'for kids'. The localization issue isn't about trannies. It already went wrong 20 years ago with 4kids adopting this for daytime TV.

Maturity Rating: TV-14

And that rating is also clearly too low.

-5
Questionable -5 points ago +1 / -6

Hey, I asked about the translation in this fictional fantasy story for adults. Not a minutes reading of your local DNC meeting.

-5
Questionable -5 points ago +1 / -6

The guy has a power to change his and other people's sexes. Yes, it's fiction, but it's also cannon.

Do you even watch One Piece? It's a major aspect of the character.

-4
Questionable -4 points ago +2 / -6

Emporio Ivankov is a tranny. Has been for over a decade now. He swaps peoples sexes. You are mad at me for pointing this out? Or maybe that I called it fiction, for a fictional world? You tell me.

Be prepared to be really angry then. That is a fact regardless as to how the story is translated. Making the whole complaint about bad translations, pointless.

This story is full of blood sex and death. Don't let your kids watch adult cartoons without supervision.

-9
Questionable -9 points ago +2 / -11

They're not wrong. But they are also not right.

It's important to remember that this is a fictional world. Were these thing are possible. Unlike in reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QH7RLD_AZDI

And yes. Taking all the subtly out of it makes it stupid. If I wanted to get hit in the face with a dead fish, I would visit the whore house above the wet market in China town.

16
Questionable 16 points ago +16 / -0

"I don't know what debank means"

Well that's OK. Because your viewers can simply look it up. Just as you could. It has it's own wiki page:

§

"The closure of accounts is generally performed without giving a reason and without the prospect of appeal. De-banking can have severe consequences for individuals, as it cuts them off from many activities in society. "

4
Questionable 4 points ago +4 / -0

By 'promote', does she mean 'simply existing'? I'm asking because, I'm not watching a 20 minute video.

-1
Questionable -1 points ago +2 / -3

Creative. But, I don't seeing it holding real value.

3
Questionable 3 points ago +4 / -1

What I have stated was "If America is your host Nation, you must respect our customs." Your reply to a partial quote is irrelevant. Do as you please in your country. The death of your spirit is of no concern to me.

§

6
Questionable 6 points ago +7 / -1

If America is your host Nation, you must respect our customs.

Pedophilia is an attraction to prepubescent children. Sexual relations with them is rape, and can cause irreparable harm, and even death.

One does not achieve spiritual enrichment through personal gratification and the destruction of others.

You have been warned.

11
Questionable 11 points ago +11 / -0

But you don't seem to know how to do that. You don't seem to know anything outside of vague talking points, and bad grammar. And saying that you 'misspoke' would be giving you the benefit of the doubt.

ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ̯̯̯̯̯̯̯̯☊̯̯̯̯̯̯̯̯

14
Questionable 14 points ago +14 / -0

Also, this video only has 2500 views?

Nobody wants that crap in their viewing history. Contaminate your searches for months.

5
Questionable 5 points ago +5 / -0

I couldn't stop thinking about that name.

6
Questionable 6 points ago +6 / -0

I also don't know why anyone would even consider going on camera with him without having a camera of their own that they control.

Like most people, they probably remember old Jon, Stewart, and do not realize that they are dealing with new Jon Stewart. And assume he's going to give them a fair shake.

4 years back there was a tipping point, both him and John Oliver, stopped putting in effort, and stared living off their past reputations, while spreading lies. It was like a switch was flipped, and they went full propaganda without hesitation.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›